Cargando…
Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjace...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27611853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932 |
_version_ | 1782452806949535744 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Juan Yuan, Wei Wang, Ruihua Wang, Qiuping Li, Yi Xue, Chaofan Yan, Yanli Ma, Xiaowei Tan, Li Liu, Zi |
author_facet | Ren, Juan Yuan, Wei Wang, Ruihua Wang, Qiuping Li, Yi Xue, Chaofan Yan, Yanli Ma, Xiaowei Tan, Li Liu, Zi |
author_sort | Ren, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjacent organs-at risk (OARs). METHODS: A total of 79 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled to receive 2D point A-based BT planning and then immediately to receive 3D planning between October 2011 and April 2013 at the First Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiao Tong University (Xi’an, China). The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) and OARs were compared between the 2D and 3D planning. RESULTS: In small tumors, there was no significant difference in most of the DVHs between 2D and 3D planning (all p>0.05). While in big tumors, 3D BT planning significantly increased the DVHs for most of the GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, and some OARs compared with 2D planning (all P<0.05). In 3D planning, DVHs for GTV, HR-CTV, IR-CTV and some OARs were significantly higher in big tumors than in small tumors (all p<0.05). In contrast, in 2D planning, DVHs for almost all of the HR-CTV and IR-CTV were significantly lower in big tumors (all p<0.05). In eccentric tumors, 3D planning significantly increased dose coverage but decreased dosages to OARs compared with 2D planning (p<0.05). In tumors invading adjacent tissues, the target dose coverage in 3D planning was generally significantly higher than in 2D planning (P<0.05); the dosages to the adjacent rectum and bladder were significantly higher but those to sigmoid colon were lower in 3D planning (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D MRI image-guided BT planning exhibits advantages over 2D planning in a complex way, generally showing advantages for the treatment of cervical cancer except small tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5017728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50177282016-09-27 Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer Ren, Juan Yuan, Wei Wang, Ruihua Wang, Qiuping Li, Yi Xue, Chaofan Yan, Yanli Ma, Xiaowei Tan, Li Liu, Zi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjacent organs-at risk (OARs). METHODS: A total of 79 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled to receive 2D point A-based BT planning and then immediately to receive 3D planning between October 2011 and April 2013 at the First Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiao Tong University (Xi’an, China). The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) and OARs were compared between the 2D and 3D planning. RESULTS: In small tumors, there was no significant difference in most of the DVHs between 2D and 3D planning (all p>0.05). While in big tumors, 3D BT planning significantly increased the DVHs for most of the GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, and some OARs compared with 2D planning (all P<0.05). In 3D planning, DVHs for GTV, HR-CTV, IR-CTV and some OARs were significantly higher in big tumors than in small tumors (all p<0.05). In contrast, in 2D planning, DVHs for almost all of the HR-CTV and IR-CTV were significantly lower in big tumors (all p<0.05). In eccentric tumors, 3D planning significantly increased dose coverage but decreased dosages to OARs compared with 2D planning (p<0.05). In tumors invading adjacent tissues, the target dose coverage in 3D planning was generally significantly higher than in 2D planning (P<0.05); the dosages to the adjacent rectum and bladder were significantly higher but those to sigmoid colon were lower in 3D planning (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D MRI image-guided BT planning exhibits advantages over 2D planning in a complex way, generally showing advantages for the treatment of cervical cancer except small tumors. Public Library of Science 2016-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5017728/ /pubmed/27611853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932 Text en © 2016 Ren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ren, Juan Yuan, Wei Wang, Ruihua Wang, Qiuping Li, Yi Xue, Chaofan Yan, Yanli Ma, Xiaowei Tan, Li Liu, Zi Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title | Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title_full | Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title_short | Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer |
title_sort | dosimetric comparison between three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-guided and conventional two-dimensional point a-based intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27611853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renjuan dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT yuanwei dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT wangruihua dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT wangqiuping dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT liyi dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT xuechaofan dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT yanyanli dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT maxiaowei dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT tanli dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer AT liuzi dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer |