Cargando…

Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Juan, Yuan, Wei, Wang, Ruihua, Wang, Qiuping, Li, Yi, Xue, Chaofan, Yan, Yanli, Ma, Xiaowei, Tan, Li, Liu, Zi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27611853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932
_version_ 1782452806949535744
author Ren, Juan
Yuan, Wei
Wang, Ruihua
Wang, Qiuping
Li, Yi
Xue, Chaofan
Yan, Yanli
Ma, Xiaowei
Tan, Li
Liu, Zi
author_facet Ren, Juan
Yuan, Wei
Wang, Ruihua
Wang, Qiuping
Li, Yi
Xue, Chaofan
Yan, Yanli
Ma, Xiaowei
Tan, Li
Liu, Zi
author_sort Ren, Juan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjacent organs-at risk (OARs). METHODS: A total of 79 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled to receive 2D point A-based BT planning and then immediately to receive 3D planning between October 2011 and April 2013 at the First Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiao Tong University (Xi’an, China). The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) and OARs were compared between the 2D and 3D planning. RESULTS: In small tumors, there was no significant difference in most of the DVHs between 2D and 3D planning (all p>0.05). While in big tumors, 3D BT planning significantly increased the DVHs for most of the GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, and some OARs compared with 2D planning (all P<0.05). In 3D planning, DVHs for GTV, HR-CTV, IR-CTV and some OARs were significantly higher in big tumors than in small tumors (all p<0.05). In contrast, in 2D planning, DVHs for almost all of the HR-CTV and IR-CTV were significantly lower in big tumors (all p<0.05). In eccentric tumors, 3D planning significantly increased dose coverage but decreased dosages to OARs compared with 2D planning (p<0.05). In tumors invading adjacent tissues, the target dose coverage in 3D planning was generally significantly higher than in 2D planning (P<0.05); the dosages to the adjacent rectum and bladder were significantly higher but those to sigmoid colon were lower in 3D planning (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D MRI image-guided BT planning exhibits advantages over 2D planning in a complex way, generally showing advantages for the treatment of cervical cancer except small tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50177282016-09-27 Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer Ren, Juan Yuan, Wei Wang, Ruihua Wang, Qiuping Li, Yi Xue, Chaofan Yan, Yanli Ma, Xiaowei Tan, Li Liu, Zi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided and conventional 2-dimensional (2D) point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) planning for cervical cancer with regard to target dose coverage and dosages to adjacent organs-at risk (OARs). METHODS: A total of 79 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled to receive 2D point A-based BT planning and then immediately to receive 3D planning between October 2011 and April 2013 at the First Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiao Tong University (Xi’an, China). The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) and OARs were compared between the 2D and 3D planning. RESULTS: In small tumors, there was no significant difference in most of the DVHs between 2D and 3D planning (all p>0.05). While in big tumors, 3D BT planning significantly increased the DVHs for most of the GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, and some OARs compared with 2D planning (all P<0.05). In 3D planning, DVHs for GTV, HR-CTV, IR-CTV and some OARs were significantly higher in big tumors than in small tumors (all p<0.05). In contrast, in 2D planning, DVHs for almost all of the HR-CTV and IR-CTV were significantly lower in big tumors (all p<0.05). In eccentric tumors, 3D planning significantly increased dose coverage but decreased dosages to OARs compared with 2D planning (p<0.05). In tumors invading adjacent tissues, the target dose coverage in 3D planning was generally significantly higher than in 2D planning (P<0.05); the dosages to the adjacent rectum and bladder were significantly higher but those to sigmoid colon were lower in 3D planning (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D MRI image-guided BT planning exhibits advantages over 2D planning in a complex way, generally showing advantages for the treatment of cervical cancer except small tumors. Public Library of Science 2016-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5017728/ /pubmed/27611853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932 Text en © 2016 Ren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ren, Juan
Yuan, Wei
Wang, Ruihua
Wang, Qiuping
Li, Yi
Xue, Chaofan
Yan, Yanli
Ma, Xiaowei
Tan, Li
Liu, Zi
Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title_full Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title_short Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer
title_sort dosimetric comparison between three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-guided and conventional two-dimensional point a-based intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27611853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161932
work_keys_str_mv AT renjuan dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT yuanwei dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT wangruihua dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT wangqiuping dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT liyi dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT xuechaofan dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT yanyanli dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT maxiaowei dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT tanli dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer
AT liuzi dosimetriccomparisonbetweenthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingguidedandconventionaltwodimensionalpointabasedintracavitarybrachytherapyplanningforcervicalcancer