Cargando…

Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes

Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Luchin F., Wilkes, Jacob, Korgenski, Kent, Varner, Michael W., Manuck, Tracy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198
_version_ 1782452838812614656
author Wong, Luchin F.
Wilkes, Jacob
Korgenski, Kent
Varner, Michael W.
Manuck, Tracy A.
author_facet Wong, Luchin F.
Wilkes, Jacob
Korgenski, Kent
Varner, Michael W.
Manuck, Tracy A.
author_sort Wong, Luchin F.
collection PubMed
description Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies carried to ≥ 20(0/7) weeks' gestation within a tertiary health care system from 2002 to 2012. Cervical laceration cases were identified by ICD9 codes and included if suture repair was required. Results In this study, 55 women were confirmed to have a cervical laceration in the first delivery; 43 lacerations after vaginal delivery (VD) and 12 after cesarean delivery (CD). The median gestational age of the first delivery was 40(0/7) weeks and the median birth weight 3,545 g; these did not differ between VD and CD. In the second pregnancy, 2 of 55 women (4.6%) had a prophylactic cerclage placed; 1 carried to term and the other delivered at 35(6/7) weeks. In total, four women (9.3%) delivered the second pregnancy < 37 weeks: three had a prior term VD and one had a prior 34 weeks VD. There was only one case of recurrent cervical laceration, occurring in the setting of vaginal deliveries. Conclusion Obstetric cervical lacerations are uncommon. Complications in the following pregnancy were low, despite lack of additional prophylactic cerclage use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50178842016-09-12 Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes Wong, Luchin F. Wilkes, Jacob Korgenski, Kent Varner, Michael W. Manuck, Tracy A. AJP Rep Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies carried to ≥ 20(0/7) weeks' gestation within a tertiary health care system from 2002 to 2012. Cervical laceration cases were identified by ICD9 codes and included if suture repair was required. Results In this study, 55 women were confirmed to have a cervical laceration in the first delivery; 43 lacerations after vaginal delivery (VD) and 12 after cesarean delivery (CD). The median gestational age of the first delivery was 40(0/7) weeks and the median birth weight 3,545 g; these did not differ between VD and CD. In the second pregnancy, 2 of 55 women (4.6%) had a prophylactic cerclage placed; 1 carried to term and the other delivered at 35(6/7) weeks. In total, four women (9.3%) delivered the second pregnancy < 37 weeks: three had a prior term VD and one had a prior 34 weeks VD. There was only one case of recurrent cervical laceration, occurring in the setting of vaginal deliveries. Conclusion Obstetric cervical lacerations are uncommon. Complications in the following pregnancy were low, despite lack of additional prophylactic cerclage use. Thieme Medical Publishers 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5017884/ /pubmed/27621953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Wong, Luchin F.
Wilkes, Jacob
Korgenski, Kent
Varner, Michael W.
Manuck, Tracy A.
Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title_full Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title_fullStr Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title_short Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
title_sort intrapartum cervical laceration and subsequent pregnancy outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198
work_keys_str_mv AT wongluchinf intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes
AT wilkesjacob intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes
AT korgenskikent intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes
AT varnermichaelw intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes
AT manucktracya intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes