Cargando…
Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198 |
_version_ | 1782452838812614656 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Luchin F. Wilkes, Jacob Korgenski, Kent Varner, Michael W. Manuck, Tracy A. |
author_facet | Wong, Luchin F. Wilkes, Jacob Korgenski, Kent Varner, Michael W. Manuck, Tracy A. |
author_sort | Wong, Luchin F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies carried to ≥ 20(0/7) weeks' gestation within a tertiary health care system from 2002 to 2012. Cervical laceration cases were identified by ICD9 codes and included if suture repair was required. Results In this study, 55 women were confirmed to have a cervical laceration in the first delivery; 43 lacerations after vaginal delivery (VD) and 12 after cesarean delivery (CD). The median gestational age of the first delivery was 40(0/7) weeks and the median birth weight 3,545 g; these did not differ between VD and CD. In the second pregnancy, 2 of 55 women (4.6%) had a prophylactic cerclage placed; 1 carried to term and the other delivered at 35(6/7) weeks. In total, four women (9.3%) delivered the second pregnancy < 37 weeks: three had a prior term VD and one had a prior 34 weeks VD. There was only one case of recurrent cervical laceration, occurring in the setting of vaginal deliveries. Conclusion Obstetric cervical lacerations are uncommon. Complications in the following pregnancy were low, despite lack of additional prophylactic cerclage use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5017884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50178842016-09-12 Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes Wong, Luchin F. Wilkes, Jacob Korgenski, Kent Varner, Michael W. Manuck, Tracy A. AJP Rep Objective The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes, including cervical insufficiency and preterm birth, in the subsequent pregnancy following an intrapartum cervical laceration. Study Design Retrospective cohort of women with their first two consecutive singleton pregnancies carried to ≥ 20(0/7) weeks' gestation within a tertiary health care system from 2002 to 2012. Cervical laceration cases were identified by ICD9 codes and included if suture repair was required. Results In this study, 55 women were confirmed to have a cervical laceration in the first delivery; 43 lacerations after vaginal delivery (VD) and 12 after cesarean delivery (CD). The median gestational age of the first delivery was 40(0/7) weeks and the median birth weight 3,545 g; these did not differ between VD and CD. In the second pregnancy, 2 of 55 women (4.6%) had a prophylactic cerclage placed; 1 carried to term and the other delivered at 35(6/7) weeks. In total, four women (9.3%) delivered the second pregnancy < 37 weeks: three had a prior term VD and one had a prior 34 weeks VD. There was only one case of recurrent cervical laceration, occurring in the setting of vaginal deliveries. Conclusion Obstetric cervical lacerations are uncommon. Complications in the following pregnancy were low, despite lack of additional prophylactic cerclage use. Thieme Medical Publishers 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5017884/ /pubmed/27621953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Wong, Luchin F. Wilkes, Jacob Korgenski, Kent Varner, Michael W. Manuck, Tracy A. Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title | Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_full | Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_short | Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_sort | intrapartum cervical laceration and subsequent pregnancy outcomes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongluchinf intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes AT wilkesjacob intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes AT korgenskikent intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes AT varnermichaelw intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes AT manucktracya intrapartumcervicallacerationandsubsequentpregnancyoutcomes |