Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Jin, Seo, Youngkwon, Ren, Shuo, Hong, Sunwoo, Lee, Dongki, Kim, Soyoun, Jiang, Yuanyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7
_version_ 1782452846698954752
author Guo, Jin
Seo, Youngkwon
Ren, Shuo
Hong, Sunwoo
Lee, Dongki
Kim, Soyoun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
author_facet Guo, Jin
Seo, Youngkwon
Ren, Shuo
Hong, Sunwoo
Lee, Dongki
Kim, Soyoun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
author_sort Guo, Jin
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafter) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies reporting direct per-lesion comparison data of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 were analyzed. The data of each study were extracted. Systematic review, paired meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. Twelve studies including 627 patients and 793 HCC lesions were analyzed. The sensitivity estimates of MRI and CT were, respectively, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.93) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.80), with significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity estimates were both 0.94 (95% CI 0.92–0.96) (Chi-square 4.84, degrees of freedom = 1, P > 0.05). In all subgroups, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than multidetector CT for the detection of HCC, and specificity estimates of both tests maintained at a similarly high level in all conditions: sensitivity estimates of both tests were reduced in studies where patients were diagnosed with HCC solely by liver explant or in those where HCC lesions were small (≤2 cm, especially when ≤1 cm). But in all situations, sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT with or without significance. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging showed better per-lesion diagnostic performance than multidetector CT for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and in small hepatic lesions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5018023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50180232016-09-20 Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis Guo, Jin Seo, Youngkwon Ren, Shuo Hong, Sunwoo Lee, Dongki Kim, Soyoun Jiang, Yuanyuan Abdom Radiol (NY) Article The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafter) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies reporting direct per-lesion comparison data of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 were analyzed. The data of each study were extracted. Systematic review, paired meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. Twelve studies including 627 patients and 793 HCC lesions were analyzed. The sensitivity estimates of MRI and CT were, respectively, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.93) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.80), with significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity estimates were both 0.94 (95% CI 0.92–0.96) (Chi-square 4.84, degrees of freedom = 1, P > 0.05). In all subgroups, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than multidetector CT for the detection of HCC, and specificity estimates of both tests maintained at a similarly high level in all conditions: sensitivity estimates of both tests were reduced in studies where patients were diagnosed with HCC solely by liver explant or in those where HCC lesions were small (≤2 cm, especially when ≤1 cm). But in all situations, sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT with or without significance. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging showed better per-lesion diagnostic performance than multidetector CT for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and in small hepatic lesions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-06-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5018023/ /pubmed/27318936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Jin
Seo, Youngkwon
Ren, Shuo
Hong, Sunwoo
Lee, Dongki
Kim, Soyoun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27318936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guojin diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT seoyoungkwon diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT renshuo diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT hongsunwoo diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT leedongki diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT kimsoyoun diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis
AT jiangyuanyuan diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyandgadoxeticaciddisodiumenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingindetectinghepatocellularcarcinomadirectcomparisonandametaanalysis