Cargando…
Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are often slow-growing and patients may live for years with metastasised disease. Hence, along with increasing overall and progression-free survival, treatments aim at preserving patients’ well-being and health-related quality of li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0527-2 |
_version_ | 1782452874786111488 |
---|---|
author | Martini, Caroline Gamper, Eva-Maria Wintner, Lisa Nilica, Bernhard Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara Holzner, Bernhard Virgolini, Irene |
author_facet | Martini, Caroline Gamper, Eva-Maria Wintner, Lisa Nilica, Bernhard Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara Holzner, Bernhard Virgolini, Irene |
author_sort | Martini, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are often slow-growing and patients may live for years with metastasised disease. Hence, along with increasing overall and progression-free survival, treatments aim at preserving patients’ well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, studies on systematic HRQoL assessment in patients with GEP-NET are scarce. Therefore, the purpose of the current review is to systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the identified studies. METHODS: A targeted database search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Data extraction was conducted by two independent researchers according to predefined criteria. For study evaluation, the Minimum Standard Checklist for Evaluating HRQoL Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials and the CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome extension were adapted. RESULTS: The database search yielded 48 eligible studies. We found the awareness for the need of HRQoL measurement to be growing and application of cancer-specific instruments gaining acceptance. Overall, studies were too heterogeneous in terms of patient characteristics and treatment interventions to draw clear conclusions for clinical practice. More importantly, a range of methodological shortcomings has been identified which were mainly related to the assessment and statistical analysis, as well as the reporting and interpretation of HRQoL data. CONCLUSION: Despite an increasing interest in HRQoL in GEP-NET patients, there is still a lack of knowledge on this issue. A transfer of HRQoL results into clinical practice is hindered not only by the scarceness of studies, but also by the often limited quality of HRQoL processing and reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0527-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5018190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50181902016-09-11 Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours Martini, Caroline Gamper, Eva-Maria Wintner, Lisa Nilica, Bernhard Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara Holzner, Bernhard Virgolini, Irene Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are often slow-growing and patients may live for years with metastasised disease. Hence, along with increasing overall and progression-free survival, treatments aim at preserving patients’ well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, studies on systematic HRQoL assessment in patients with GEP-NET are scarce. Therefore, the purpose of the current review is to systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the identified studies. METHODS: A targeted database search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Data extraction was conducted by two independent researchers according to predefined criteria. For study evaluation, the Minimum Standard Checklist for Evaluating HRQoL Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials and the CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome extension were adapted. RESULTS: The database search yielded 48 eligible studies. We found the awareness for the need of HRQoL measurement to be growing and application of cancer-specific instruments gaining acceptance. Overall, studies were too heterogeneous in terms of patient characteristics and treatment interventions to draw clear conclusions for clinical practice. More importantly, a range of methodological shortcomings has been identified which were mainly related to the assessment and statistical analysis, as well as the reporting and interpretation of HRQoL data. CONCLUSION: Despite an increasing interest in HRQoL in GEP-NET patients, there is still a lack of knowledge on this issue. A transfer of HRQoL results into clinical practice is hindered not only by the scarceness of studies, but also by the often limited quality of HRQoL processing and reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0527-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5018190/ /pubmed/27614762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0527-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Martini, Caroline Gamper, Eva-Maria Wintner, Lisa Nilica, Bernhard Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara Holzner, Bernhard Virgolini, Irene Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title | Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title_full | Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title_fullStr | Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title_short | Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
title_sort | systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0527-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinicaroline systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT gamperevamaria systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT wintnerlisa systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT nilicabernhard systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT spernerunterwegerbarbara systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT holznerbernhard systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours AT virgoliniirene systematicreviewrevealslackofqualityinreportinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumours |