Cargando…

Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets

INTRODUCTION: Provision of adequate nutrients is critical for proper growth and development of the neonate, yet the impact of breastfeeding versus formula feeding on neural maturation has to be fully determined. Using the piglet as a model for the human infant, our objective was to compare neurodeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Reeba M., Mudd, Austin T., Alexander, Lindsey S., Lai, Chron-Si, Dilger, Ryan N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27672632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2016.00095
_version_ 1782452914747342848
author Jacob, Reeba M.
Mudd, Austin T.
Alexander, Lindsey S.
Lai, Chron-Si
Dilger, Ryan N.
author_facet Jacob, Reeba M.
Mudd, Austin T.
Alexander, Lindsey S.
Lai, Chron-Si
Dilger, Ryan N.
author_sort Jacob, Reeba M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Provision of adequate nutrients is critical for proper growth and development of the neonate, yet the impact of breastfeeding versus formula feeding on neural maturation has to be fully determined. Using the piglet as a model for the human infant, our objective was to compare neurodevelopment of piglets that were either sow-reared (SR) or artificially reared (AR) in an artificial setting. METHODS: Over a 25-day feeding study, piglets (1.5 ± 0.2 kg initial bodyweight) were either SR (n = 10) with ad libitum intake or AR (n = 29) receiving an infant formula modified to mimic the nutritional profile and intake pattern of sow’s milk. At study conclusion, piglets were subjected to a standardized set of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures to quantify structure and composition of the brain. RESULTS: Diffusion tensor imaging, an MRI sequence that characterizes brain microstructure, revealed that SR piglets had greater (P < 0.05) average white matter (WM) (generated from a piglet specific brain atlas) fractional anisotropy (FA), and lower (P < 0.05) mean and radial and axial diffusivity values compared with AR piglets, suggesting differences in WM organization. Voxel-based morphometric analysis, a measure of white and gray matter (GM) volumes concentrations, revealed differences (P < 0.05) in bilateral development of GM clusters in the cortical brain regions of the AR piglets compared with SR piglets. Region of interest analysis revealed larger (P < 0.05) whole brain volumes in SR animals compared with AR, and certain subcortical regions to be larger (P < 0.05) as a percentage of whole brain volume in AR piglets compared with SR animals. Quantification of brain metabolites using magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed SR piglets had higher (P < 0.05) concentrations of myo-inositol, glycerophosphocholine + phosphocholine, and creatine + phosphocreatine compared with AR piglets. However, glutamate + glutamine levels were higher (P < 0.05) in AR piglets when compared with SR animals. CONCLUSION: Overall, increases in brain metabolite concentrations, coupled with greater FA values in WM tracts and volume differences in GM of specific brain regions, suggest differences in myelin development and cell proliferation in SR versus AR piglets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5018487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50184872016-09-26 Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets Jacob, Reeba M. Mudd, Austin T. Alexander, Lindsey S. Lai, Chron-Si Dilger, Ryan N. Front Pediatr Pediatrics INTRODUCTION: Provision of adequate nutrients is critical for proper growth and development of the neonate, yet the impact of breastfeeding versus formula feeding on neural maturation has to be fully determined. Using the piglet as a model for the human infant, our objective was to compare neurodevelopment of piglets that were either sow-reared (SR) or artificially reared (AR) in an artificial setting. METHODS: Over a 25-day feeding study, piglets (1.5 ± 0.2 kg initial bodyweight) were either SR (n = 10) with ad libitum intake or AR (n = 29) receiving an infant formula modified to mimic the nutritional profile and intake pattern of sow’s milk. At study conclusion, piglets were subjected to a standardized set of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures to quantify structure and composition of the brain. RESULTS: Diffusion tensor imaging, an MRI sequence that characterizes brain microstructure, revealed that SR piglets had greater (P < 0.05) average white matter (WM) (generated from a piglet specific brain atlas) fractional anisotropy (FA), and lower (P < 0.05) mean and radial and axial diffusivity values compared with AR piglets, suggesting differences in WM organization. Voxel-based morphometric analysis, a measure of white and gray matter (GM) volumes concentrations, revealed differences (P < 0.05) in bilateral development of GM clusters in the cortical brain regions of the AR piglets compared with SR piglets. Region of interest analysis revealed larger (P < 0.05) whole brain volumes in SR animals compared with AR, and certain subcortical regions to be larger (P < 0.05) as a percentage of whole brain volume in AR piglets compared with SR animals. Quantification of brain metabolites using magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed SR piglets had higher (P < 0.05) concentrations of myo-inositol, glycerophosphocholine + phosphocholine, and creatine + phosphocreatine compared with AR piglets. However, glutamate + glutamine levels were higher (P < 0.05) in AR piglets when compared with SR animals. CONCLUSION: Overall, increases in brain metabolite concentrations, coupled with greater FA values in WM tracts and volume differences in GM of specific brain regions, suggest differences in myelin development and cell proliferation in SR versus AR piglets. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5018487/ /pubmed/27672632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2016.00095 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jacob, Mudd, Alexander, Lai and Dilger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Jacob, Reeba M.
Mudd, Austin T.
Alexander, Lindsey S.
Lai, Chron-Si
Dilger, Ryan N.
Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title_full Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title_fullStr Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title_short Comparison of Brain Development in Sow-Reared and Artificially Reared Piglets
title_sort comparison of brain development in sow-reared and artificially reared piglets
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27672632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2016.00095
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobreebam comparisonofbraindevelopmentinsowrearedandartificiallyrearedpiglets
AT muddaustint comparisonofbraindevelopmentinsowrearedandartificiallyrearedpiglets
AT alexanderlindseys comparisonofbraindevelopmentinsowrearedandartificiallyrearedpiglets
AT laichronsi comparisonofbraindevelopmentinsowrearedandartificiallyrearedpiglets
AT dilgerryann comparisonofbraindevelopmentinsowrearedandartificiallyrearedpiglets