Cargando…
An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience
PURPOSE: Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie (GEC) and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) has proposed a rectal dose constraint of the most exposed 2-cc volume (D(2cc) of ≤ 75 Gy EQD(2α/β) = 3) during external-beam plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in localized prostate c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.61738 |
_version_ | 1782452923250245632 |
---|---|
author | Chicas-Sett, Rodolfo Celada-Alvarez, Francisco Roldán, Susana Torregrosa, Asunción Betancourt, Jesus Bautista-Ballesteros, Juan Farga, Dolores Ibañez, Blanca Tormo, Alejandro Perez-Calatayud, Jose |
author_facet | Chicas-Sett, Rodolfo Celada-Alvarez, Francisco Roldán, Susana Torregrosa, Asunción Betancourt, Jesus Bautista-Ballesteros, Juan Farga, Dolores Ibañez, Blanca Tormo, Alejandro Perez-Calatayud, Jose |
author_sort | Chicas-Sett, Rodolfo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie (GEC) and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) has proposed a rectal dose constraint of the most exposed 2-cc volume (D(2cc) of ≤ 75 Gy EQD(2α/β) = 3) during external-beam plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in localized prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate D(2cc) for rectal contouring via interobserver variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four blinded observers contoured rectums of 5 patients. Rectal contouring anatomical limits were determined through previous consensus. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) dosimetric parameters (D(0.1cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc)) were analyzed according to GEC/ESTRO recommendations and subjected to intra- and interobserver comparisons. Latter comparisons involved coefficients of variation. For each parameter, the mean, standard deviation (SD), and range were evaluated. The effect of interobserver variation on total dose was analyzed by estimating the biologically equivalent rectal dose (EQD(2α/β) = 3). RESULTS: Interobserver coefficients of variation for D(0.1cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc) were 5.7%, 4.5%, and 4%, respectively. The highest interobserver rectal delineation variation yielded a rectal dose difference up to 5.8 Gy EQD(2). Estimated intraobserver variation for the reported D(2cc) was 5.5% in the worst-case scenario (non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: We observed acceptable interobserver variability in EQD(2) for D(2cc), with strong impacts on clinical threshold levels (D(2cc) ≤ 75 Gy EQD(2)) in some cases. This small, single-center analysis will be extended in a multicenter study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5018524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50185242016-09-19 An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience Chicas-Sett, Rodolfo Celada-Alvarez, Francisco Roldán, Susana Torregrosa, Asunción Betancourt, Jesus Bautista-Ballesteros, Juan Farga, Dolores Ibañez, Blanca Tormo, Alejandro Perez-Calatayud, Jose J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie (GEC) and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) has proposed a rectal dose constraint of the most exposed 2-cc volume (D(2cc) of ≤ 75 Gy EQD(2α/β) = 3) during external-beam plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in localized prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate D(2cc) for rectal contouring via interobserver variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four blinded observers contoured rectums of 5 patients. Rectal contouring anatomical limits were determined through previous consensus. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) dosimetric parameters (D(0.1cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc)) were analyzed according to GEC/ESTRO recommendations and subjected to intra- and interobserver comparisons. Latter comparisons involved coefficients of variation. For each parameter, the mean, standard deviation (SD), and range were evaluated. The effect of interobserver variation on total dose was analyzed by estimating the biologically equivalent rectal dose (EQD(2α/β) = 3). RESULTS: Interobserver coefficients of variation for D(0.1cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc) were 5.7%, 4.5%, and 4%, respectively. The highest interobserver rectal delineation variation yielded a rectal dose difference up to 5.8 Gy EQD(2). Estimated intraobserver variation for the reported D(2cc) was 5.5% in the worst-case scenario (non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: We observed acceptable interobserver variability in EQD(2) for D(2cc), with strong impacts on clinical threshold levels (D(2cc) ≤ 75 Gy EQD(2)) in some cases. This small, single-center analysis will be extended in a multicenter study. Termedia Publishing House 2016-08-16 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5018524/ /pubmed/27648090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.61738 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chicas-Sett, Rodolfo Celada-Alvarez, Francisco Roldán, Susana Torregrosa, Asunción Betancourt, Jesus Bautista-Ballesteros, Juan Farga, Dolores Ibañez, Blanca Tormo, Alejandro Perez-Calatayud, Jose An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title | An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title_full | An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title_short | An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
title_sort | evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by gec/estro according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.61738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chicassettrodolfo anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT celadaalvarezfrancisco anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT roldansusana anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT torregrosaasuncion anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT betancourtjesus anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT bautistaballesterosjuan anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT fargadolores anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT ibanezblanca anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT tormoalejandro anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT perezcalatayudjose anevaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT chicassettrodolfo evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT celadaalvarezfrancisco evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT roldansusana evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT torregrosaasuncion evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT betancourtjesus evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT bautistaballesterosjuan evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT fargadolores evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT ibanezblanca evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT tormoalejandro evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience AT perezcalatayudjose evaluationoftherobustnessoforganatriskrecommendationsmadebygecestroaccordingtointerobservervariabilityasinglecenterexperience |