Cargando…

Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans

Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software ver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishna, Gangarapu Sri, Srinivas, Vuppu, Ayyangar, K. M., Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489
_version_ 1782452998712066048
author Krishna, Gangarapu Sri
Srinivas, Vuppu
Ayyangar, K. M.
Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri
author_facet Krishna, Gangarapu Sri
Srinivas, Vuppu
Ayyangar, K. M.
Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri
author_sort Krishna, Gangarapu Sri
collection PubMed
description Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software version. According to manufacturer, accuracy of point dose calculations and irregular treatment planning is better in the new version (13.6) compared to the old version (8.8). Furthermore, the new version uses voxel-based calculations while the earlier version used point dose calculations. Major difference in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans was observed between the two versions after re-optimization and re-calculations. However, minor difference was observed for IMRT cases after performing only re-calculations. It is recommended TPS quality assurance to be performed after any major upgrade of software. This can be done by performing dose calculation comparisons in TPS. To assess the difference between the versions, 25 clinical cases from the old version were compared keeping all the patient data intact including the monitor units and comparing the differences in dose calculations using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Along with DVH analysis, uniformity index, conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose spillage index were also compared for both versions. The results of comparative study are presented in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5019038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50190382016-09-20 Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans Krishna, Gangarapu Sri Srinivas, Vuppu Ayyangar, K. M. Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri J Med Phys Technical Note Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software version. According to manufacturer, accuracy of point dose calculations and irregular treatment planning is better in the new version (13.6) compared to the old version (8.8). Furthermore, the new version uses voxel-based calculations while the earlier version used point dose calculations. Major difference in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans was observed between the two versions after re-optimization and re-calculations. However, minor difference was observed for IMRT cases after performing only re-calculations. It is recommended TPS quality assurance to be performed after any major upgrade of software. This can be done by performing dose calculation comparisons in TPS. To assess the difference between the versions, 25 clinical cases from the old version were compared keeping all the patient data intact including the monitor units and comparing the differences in dose calculations using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Along with DVH analysis, uniformity index, conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose spillage index were also compared for both versions. The results of comparative study are presented in this paper. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5019038/ /pubmed/27651566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Krishna, Gangarapu Sri
Srinivas, Vuppu
Ayyangar, K. M.
Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri
Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title_full Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title_fullStr Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title_short Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
title_sort comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnagangarapusri comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans
AT srinivasvuppu comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans
AT ayyangarkm comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans
AT reddypalreddyyadagiri comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans