Cargando…
Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans
Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software ver...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489 |
_version_ | 1782452998712066048 |
---|---|
author | Krishna, Gangarapu Sri Srinivas, Vuppu Ayyangar, K. M. Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri |
author_facet | Krishna, Gangarapu Sri Srinivas, Vuppu Ayyangar, K. M. Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri |
author_sort | Krishna, Gangarapu Sri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software version. According to manufacturer, accuracy of point dose calculations and irregular treatment planning is better in the new version (13.6) compared to the old version (8.8). Furthermore, the new version uses voxel-based calculations while the earlier version used point dose calculations. Major difference in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans was observed between the two versions after re-optimization and re-calculations. However, minor difference was observed for IMRT cases after performing only re-calculations. It is recommended TPS quality assurance to be performed after any major upgrade of software. This can be done by performing dose calculation comparisons in TPS. To assess the difference between the versions, 25 clinical cases from the old version were compared keeping all the patient data intact including the monitor units and comparing the differences in dose calculations using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Along with DVH analysis, uniformity index, conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose spillage index were also compared for both versions. The results of comparative study are presented in this paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5019038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50190382016-09-20 Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans Krishna, Gangarapu Sri Srinivas, Vuppu Ayyangar, K. M. Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri J Med Phys Technical Note Recently, Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 8.8 was upgraded to the latest version 13.6. It is customary that the vendor gives training on how to upgrade the existing software to the new version. However, the customer is provided less inner details about changes in the new software version. According to manufacturer, accuracy of point dose calculations and irregular treatment planning is better in the new version (13.6) compared to the old version (8.8). Furthermore, the new version uses voxel-based calculations while the earlier version used point dose calculations. Major difference in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans was observed between the two versions after re-optimization and re-calculations. However, minor difference was observed for IMRT cases after performing only re-calculations. It is recommended TPS quality assurance to be performed after any major upgrade of software. This can be done by performing dose calculation comparisons in TPS. To assess the difference between the versions, 25 clinical cases from the old version were compared keeping all the patient data intact including the monitor units and comparing the differences in dose calculations using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Along with DVH analysis, uniformity index, conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose spillage index were also compared for both versions. The results of comparative study are presented in this paper. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5019038/ /pubmed/27651566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Krishna, Gangarapu Sri Srinivas, Vuppu Ayyangar, K. M. Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title | Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title_full | Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title_short | Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
title_sort | comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.189489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnagangarapusri comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans AT srinivasvuppu comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans AT ayyangarkm comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans AT reddypalreddyyadagiri comparativestudyofoldandnewversionsoftreatmentplanningsystemusingdosevolumehistogramindicesofclinicalplans |