Cargando…
Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (L...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659 |
_version_ | 1782453055592071168 |
---|---|
author | Marcuzzi, Anna Dean, Catherine M Wrigley, Paul J Chakiath, Rosemary J Hush, Julia M |
author_facet | Marcuzzi, Anna Dean, Catherine M Wrigley, Paul J Chakiath, Rosemary J Hush, Julia M |
author_sort | Marcuzzi, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (LBP). The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. An electronic search of six databases was conducted from inception to October 2015. Experts in the field were contacted to retrieve additional unpublished data. Studies were included if they were prospective longitudinal in design, assessed at least one QST measure in people with LBP, assessed LBP status at follow-up, and reported the association of QST data with LBP status at follow-up. Statistical pooling of results was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. Of 6,408 references screened after duplicates removed, three studies were finally included. None of them reported a significant association between the QST measures assessed and the LBP outcome. Three areas at high risk of bias were identified which potentially compromise the validity of these results. Due to the paucity of available studies and the methodological shortcomings identified, it remains unknown whether QST measures are predictive of outcome in LBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5019427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50194272016-09-22 Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature Marcuzzi, Anna Dean, Catherine M Wrigley, Paul J Chakiath, Rosemary J Hush, Julia M J Pain Res Review Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (LBP). The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. An electronic search of six databases was conducted from inception to October 2015. Experts in the field were contacted to retrieve additional unpublished data. Studies were included if they were prospective longitudinal in design, assessed at least one QST measure in people with LBP, assessed LBP status at follow-up, and reported the association of QST data with LBP status at follow-up. Statistical pooling of results was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. Of 6,408 references screened after duplicates removed, three studies were finally included. None of them reported a significant association between the QST measures assessed and the LBP outcome. Three areas at high risk of bias were identified which potentially compromise the validity of these results. Due to the paucity of available studies and the methodological shortcomings identified, it remains unknown whether QST measures are predictive of outcome in LBP. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5019427/ /pubmed/27660486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659 Text en © 2016 Marcuzzi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Marcuzzi, Anna Dean, Catherine M Wrigley, Paul J Chakiath, Rosemary J Hush, Julia M Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title | Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcuzzianna prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT deancatherinem prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT wrigleypaulj prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT chakiathrosemaryj prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT hushjuliam prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature |