Cargando…

Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcuzzi, Anna, Dean, Catherine M, Wrigley, Paul J, Chakiath, Rosemary J, Hush, Julia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660486
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659
_version_ 1782453055592071168
author Marcuzzi, Anna
Dean, Catherine M
Wrigley, Paul J
Chakiath, Rosemary J
Hush, Julia M
author_facet Marcuzzi, Anna
Dean, Catherine M
Wrigley, Paul J
Chakiath, Rosemary J
Hush, Julia M
author_sort Marcuzzi, Anna
collection PubMed
description Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (LBP). The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. An electronic search of six databases was conducted from inception to October 2015. Experts in the field were contacted to retrieve additional unpublished data. Studies were included if they were prospective longitudinal in design, assessed at least one QST measure in people with LBP, assessed LBP status at follow-up, and reported the association of QST data with LBP status at follow-up. Statistical pooling of results was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. Of 6,408 references screened after duplicates removed, three studies were finally included. None of them reported a significant association between the QST measures assessed and the LBP outcome. Three areas at high risk of bias were identified which potentially compromise the validity of these results. Due to the paucity of available studies and the methodological shortcomings identified, it remains unknown whether QST measures are predictive of outcome in LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5019427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50194272016-09-22 Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature Marcuzzi, Anna Dean, Catherine M Wrigley, Paul J Chakiath, Rosemary J Hush, Julia M J Pain Res Review Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (LBP). The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. An electronic search of six databases was conducted from inception to October 2015. Experts in the field were contacted to retrieve additional unpublished data. Studies were included if they were prospective longitudinal in design, assessed at least one QST measure in people with LBP, assessed LBP status at follow-up, and reported the association of QST data with LBP status at follow-up. Statistical pooling of results was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. Of 6,408 references screened after duplicates removed, three studies were finally included. None of them reported a significant association between the QST measures assessed and the LBP outcome. Three areas at high risk of bias were identified which potentially compromise the validity of these results. Due to the paucity of available studies and the methodological shortcomings identified, it remains unknown whether QST measures are predictive of outcome in LBP. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5019427/ /pubmed/27660486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659 Text en © 2016 Marcuzzi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Marcuzzi, Anna
Dean, Catherine M
Wrigley, Paul J
Chakiath, Rosemary J
Hush, Julia M
Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660486
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S115659
work_keys_str_mv AT marcuzzianna prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT deancatherinem prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT wrigleypaulj prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT chakiathrosemaryj prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hushjuliam prognosticvalueofquantitativesensorytestinginlowbackpainasystematicreviewoftheliterature