Cargando…

A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence

PURPOSE: Patients with glaucoma who do not keep their follow-up eye care appointments are at risk for developing more severe ocular disease. The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate whether the use of a patient navigator altered adherence to follow-up eye care appointments in community-v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hark, Lisa A, Johnson, Deiana M, Berardi, Giuliana, Patel, Neal S, Zeng, Lichuan, Dai, Yang, Mayro, Eileen L, Waisbourd, Michael, Katz, L Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S108391
_version_ 1782453063929298944
author Hark, Lisa A
Johnson, Deiana M
Berardi, Giuliana
Patel, Neal S
Zeng, Lichuan
Dai, Yang
Mayro, Eileen L
Waisbourd, Michael
Katz, L Jay
author_facet Hark, Lisa A
Johnson, Deiana M
Berardi, Giuliana
Patel, Neal S
Zeng, Lichuan
Dai, Yang
Mayro, Eileen L
Waisbourd, Michael
Katz, L Jay
author_sort Hark, Lisa A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patients with glaucoma who do not keep their follow-up eye care appointments are at risk for developing more severe ocular disease. The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate whether the use of a patient navigator altered adherence to follow-up eye care appointments in community-versus office-based settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with a glaucoma-related condition following a comprehensive eye examination at 43 community sites in Philadelphia, PA, USA, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients were randomized into three groups for a 1-year period: Group 1 (G1) received follow-up eye care in a community-based setting with assistance from a patient navigator; Group 2 (G2) received follow-up eye care in an office-based setting with assistance from a patient navigator; and Group 3 (G3) received follow-up eye care in an office-based setting without a patient navigator (usual care). Adherence rates were compared among these three groups using a chi-squared test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients with glaucoma-related diagnoses were enrolled. The mean age (±standard deviation) was 71.2 (±10.0) years. Patients were predominantly female (65.8%, n=102/155) and African-American (71.6%, n=111/155). The mean (±standard deviation) number of follow-up visits during the 1-year study period was 1.3 (±1.3) for G1, 1.6 (±1.3) for G2, and 1.3 (±1.1) for G3 (P=0.48). Appointment adherence, defined as attendance of ≥1 follow-up visit, was 69.8% (n=37/53) for G1, 82.5% (n=47/57) for G2, and 73.3% (n=33/45) for G3, (P=0.28). Sub-analysis of adherence rates for patients who attended ≥2 follow-up visits were 91.3% (n=21/23) for G1, 74.3% (n=26/35) for G2, and 66.7% (n=18/27) for G3, (P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Help from a patient navigator did not increase the likelihood of keeping ≥1 follow-up appointment in an office-based setting. Adherence rates for follow-up appointments reached close to 70% or above in a self-selected patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5019463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50194632016-09-22 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence Hark, Lisa A Johnson, Deiana M Berardi, Giuliana Patel, Neal S Zeng, Lichuan Dai, Yang Mayro, Eileen L Waisbourd, Michael Katz, L Jay Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: Patients with glaucoma who do not keep their follow-up eye care appointments are at risk for developing more severe ocular disease. The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate whether the use of a patient navigator altered adherence to follow-up eye care appointments in community-versus office-based settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with a glaucoma-related condition following a comprehensive eye examination at 43 community sites in Philadelphia, PA, USA, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients were randomized into three groups for a 1-year period: Group 1 (G1) received follow-up eye care in a community-based setting with assistance from a patient navigator; Group 2 (G2) received follow-up eye care in an office-based setting with assistance from a patient navigator; and Group 3 (G3) received follow-up eye care in an office-based setting without a patient navigator (usual care). Adherence rates were compared among these three groups using a chi-squared test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients with glaucoma-related diagnoses were enrolled. The mean age (±standard deviation) was 71.2 (±10.0) years. Patients were predominantly female (65.8%, n=102/155) and African-American (71.6%, n=111/155). The mean (±standard deviation) number of follow-up visits during the 1-year study period was 1.3 (±1.3) for G1, 1.6 (±1.3) for G2, and 1.3 (±1.1) for G3 (P=0.48). Appointment adherence, defined as attendance of ≥1 follow-up visit, was 69.8% (n=37/53) for G1, 82.5% (n=47/57) for G2, and 73.3% (n=33/45) for G3, (P=0.28). Sub-analysis of adherence rates for patients who attended ≥2 follow-up visits were 91.3% (n=21/23) for G1, 74.3% (n=26/35) for G2, and 66.7% (n=18/27) for G3, (P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Help from a patient navigator did not increase the likelihood of keeping ≥1 follow-up appointment in an office-based setting. Adherence rates for follow-up appointments reached close to 70% or above in a self-selected patient population. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5019463/ /pubmed/27660423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S108391 Text en © 2016 Hark et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hark, Lisa A
Johnson, Deiana M
Berardi, Giuliana
Patel, Neal S
Zeng, Lichuan
Dai, Yang
Mayro, Eileen L
Waisbourd, Michael
Katz, L Jay
A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title_full A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title_fullStr A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title_short A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
title_sort randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S108391
work_keys_str_mv AT harklisaa arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT johnsondeianam arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT berardigiuliana arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT patelneals arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT zenglichuan arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT daiyang arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT mayroeileenl arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT waisbourdmichael arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT katzljay arandomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT harklisaa randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT johnsondeianam randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT berardigiuliana randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT patelneals randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT zenglichuan randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT daiyang randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT mayroeileenl randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT waisbourdmichael randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence
AT katzljay randomizedcontrolledtrialtotesttheeffectivenessofaglaucomapatientnavigatortoimproveappointmentadherence