Cargando…
Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Some but not all prior studies have shown that women receiving a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have a lower risk of death and appropriate shocks than men. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of gender on the risk of appropriate shock, all-cause mortality a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162756 |
_version_ | 1782453064163131392 |
---|---|
author | Conen, David Arendacká, Barbora Röver, Christian Bergau, Leonard Munoz, Pascal Wijers, Sofieke Sticherling, Christian Zabel, Markus Friede, Tim |
author_facet | Conen, David Arendacká, Barbora Röver, Christian Bergau, Leonard Munoz, Pascal Wijers, Sofieke Sticherling, Christian Zabel, Markus Friede, Tim |
author_sort | Conen, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some but not all prior studies have shown that women receiving a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have a lower risk of death and appropriate shocks than men. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of gender on the risk of appropriate shock, all-cause mortality and inappropriate shock in contemporary studies of patients receiving a primary prophylactic ICD. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, LIVIVO, Cochrane CENTRAL between 2010 and 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Studies providing at least 1 gender-specific risk estimate for the outcomes of interest. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts were screened independently for potentially eligible studies for inclusion. Thereby each abstract was reviewed by at least two authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: Out of 680 abstracts retained by our search strategy, 20 studies including 46’657 patients had gender-specific information on at least one of the relevant endpoints. Mean age across the individual studies varied between 58 and 69 years. The proportion of women enrolled ranged from 10% to 30%. Across 6 available studies, women had a significantly lower risk of first appropriate shock compared with men (pooled multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI [0.44; 0.88]). Across 14 studies reporting multivariable adjusted gender-specific hazard ratio estimates for all-cause mortality, women had a lower risk of death than men (pooled hazard ratio 0.75 (95% CI [0.66; 0.86]). There was no statistically significant difference for the incidence of first inappropriate shocks (3 studies, pooled hazard ratio 0.99 (95% CI [0.56; 1.73]). LIMITATIONS: Individual patient data were not available for most studies. CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary meta-analysis, women had a significantly lower risk of appropriate shocks and death than men, but a similar risk of inappropriate shocks. These data may help to select patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5019464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50194642016-09-27 Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Conen, David Arendacká, Barbora Röver, Christian Bergau, Leonard Munoz, Pascal Wijers, Sofieke Sticherling, Christian Zabel, Markus Friede, Tim PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Some but not all prior studies have shown that women receiving a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have a lower risk of death and appropriate shocks than men. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of gender on the risk of appropriate shock, all-cause mortality and inappropriate shock in contemporary studies of patients receiving a primary prophylactic ICD. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, LIVIVO, Cochrane CENTRAL between 2010 and 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Studies providing at least 1 gender-specific risk estimate for the outcomes of interest. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts were screened independently for potentially eligible studies for inclusion. Thereby each abstract was reviewed by at least two authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: Out of 680 abstracts retained by our search strategy, 20 studies including 46’657 patients had gender-specific information on at least one of the relevant endpoints. Mean age across the individual studies varied between 58 and 69 years. The proportion of women enrolled ranged from 10% to 30%. Across 6 available studies, women had a significantly lower risk of first appropriate shock compared with men (pooled multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI [0.44; 0.88]). Across 14 studies reporting multivariable adjusted gender-specific hazard ratio estimates for all-cause mortality, women had a lower risk of death than men (pooled hazard ratio 0.75 (95% CI [0.66; 0.86]). There was no statistically significant difference for the incidence of first inappropriate shocks (3 studies, pooled hazard ratio 0.99 (95% CI [0.56; 1.73]). LIMITATIONS: Individual patient data were not available for most studies. CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary meta-analysis, women had a significantly lower risk of appropriate shocks and death than men, but a similar risk of inappropriate shocks. These data may help to select patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation. Public Library of Science 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5019464/ /pubmed/27618617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162756 Text en © 2016 Conen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Conen, David Arendacká, Barbora Röver, Christian Bergau, Leonard Munoz, Pascal Wijers, Sofieke Sticherling, Christian Zabel, Markus Friede, Tim Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | gender differences in appropriate shocks and mortality among patients with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conendavid genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arendackabarbora genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roverchristian genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bergauleonard genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT munozpascal genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wijerssofieke genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sticherlingchristian genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zabelmarkus genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT friedetim genderdifferencesinappropriateshocksandmortalityamongpatientswithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |