Cargando…

Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors

Efficient mass transport through porous networks is essential for achieving rapid response times in sensing applications utilizing porous materials. In this work, we show that open-ended porous membranes can overcome diffusion challenges experienced by closed-ended porous materials in a microfluidic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yiliang, Gaur, Girija, Mernaugh, Raymond L., Laibinis, Paul E., Weiss, Sharon M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27620193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1614-3
_version_ 1782453156296261632
author Zhao, Yiliang
Gaur, Girija
Mernaugh, Raymond L.
Laibinis, Paul E.
Weiss, Sharon M.
author_facet Zhao, Yiliang
Gaur, Girija
Mernaugh, Raymond L.
Laibinis, Paul E.
Weiss, Sharon M.
author_sort Zhao, Yiliang
collection PubMed
description Efficient mass transport through porous networks is essential for achieving rapid response times in sensing applications utilizing porous materials. In this work, we show that open-ended porous membranes can overcome diffusion challenges experienced by closed-ended porous materials in a microfluidic environment. A theoretical model including both transport and reaction kinetics is employed to study the influence of flow velocity, bulk analyte concentration, analyte diffusivity, and adsorption rate on the performance of open-ended and closed-ended porous sensors integrated with flow cells. The analysis shows that open-ended pores enable analyte flow through the pores and greatly reduce the response time and analyte consumption for detecting large molecules with slow diffusivities compared with closed-ended pores for which analytes largely flow over the pores. Experimental confirmation of the results was carried out with open- and closed-ended porous silicon (PSi) microcavities fabricated in flow-through and flow-over sensor configurations, respectively. The adsorption behavior of small analytes onto the inner surfaces of closed-ended and open-ended PSi membrane microcavities was similar. However, for large analytes, PSi membranes in a flow-through scheme showed significant improvement in response times due to more efficient convective transport of analytes. The experimental results and theoretical analysis provide quantitative estimates of the benefits offered by open-ended porous membranes for different analyte systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50200112016-09-26 Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors Zhao, Yiliang Gaur, Girija Mernaugh, Raymond L. Laibinis, Paul E. Weiss, Sharon M. Nanoscale Res Lett Nano Express Efficient mass transport through porous networks is essential for achieving rapid response times in sensing applications utilizing porous materials. In this work, we show that open-ended porous membranes can overcome diffusion challenges experienced by closed-ended porous materials in a microfluidic environment. A theoretical model including both transport and reaction kinetics is employed to study the influence of flow velocity, bulk analyte concentration, analyte diffusivity, and adsorption rate on the performance of open-ended and closed-ended porous sensors integrated with flow cells. The analysis shows that open-ended pores enable analyte flow through the pores and greatly reduce the response time and analyte consumption for detecting large molecules with slow diffusivities compared with closed-ended pores for which analytes largely flow over the pores. Experimental confirmation of the results was carried out with open- and closed-ended porous silicon (PSi) microcavities fabricated in flow-through and flow-over sensor configurations, respectively. The adsorption behavior of small analytes onto the inner surfaces of closed-ended and open-ended PSi membrane microcavities was similar. However, for large analytes, PSi membranes in a flow-through scheme showed significant improvement in response times due to more efficient convective transport of analytes. The experimental results and theoretical analysis provide quantitative estimates of the benefits offered by open-ended porous membranes for different analyte systems. Springer US 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5020011/ /pubmed/27620193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1614-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Nano Express
Zhao, Yiliang
Gaur, Girija
Mernaugh, Raymond L.
Laibinis, Paul E.
Weiss, Sharon M.
Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title_full Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title_fullStr Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title_short Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors
title_sort comparative kinetic analysis of closed-ended and open-ended porous sensors
topic Nano Express
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27620193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1614-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyiliang comparativekineticanalysisofclosedendedandopenendedporoussensors
AT gaurgirija comparativekineticanalysisofclosedendedandopenendedporoussensors
AT mernaughraymondl comparativekineticanalysisofclosedendedandopenendedporoussensors
AT laibinispaule comparativekineticanalysisofclosedendedandopenendedporoussensors
AT weisssharonm comparativekineticanalysisofclosedendedandopenendedporoussensors