Cargando…

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION: In the prospective, open-label, non-interventional, multicenter RESPONSI(f)VE study, the effectiveness, response rates and tolerability of ivabradine with or without beta blocker (BB) were evaluated in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (AP) in daily clinical practice. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perings, Stefan, Stöckl, Georg, Kelm, Malte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27432382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0377-7
_version_ 1782453180647342080
author Perings, Stefan
Stöckl, Georg
Kelm, Malte
author_facet Perings, Stefan
Stöckl, Georg
Kelm, Malte
author_sort Perings, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the prospective, open-label, non-interventional, multicenter RESPONSI(f)VE study, the effectiveness, response rates and tolerability of ivabradine with or without beta blocker (BB) were evaluated in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (AP) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In patients with AP, ivabradine was given twice daily in flexible doses for 4 months. Resting heart rate (HR), number of angina attacks, short-acting nitrate use, severity of symptoms [by Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score] and tolerability with or without existing BB therapy were documented and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 1250 patients with AP (mean age 66.0 ± 10.9 years, 59.6% male, 31.9% previous myocardial infarction) and an indication for ivabradine were included. Sixty-five percent of all patients received BB. Further concomitant standard medication included aspirin (74.2%), statins (69.3%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (84.2%), diuretics (40.0%), long-acting nitrates (15.7%), and calcium antagonists (21.4%). After 4 months of ivabradine treatment (mean daily dose 11.0 ± 2.7 mg), mean HR was reduced from 82.4 ± 11.8 beats per minute (bpm) to 67.1 ± 8.4 bpm. The average number of angina attacks/week decreased from 1.2 ± 1.9 to 0.1 ± 0.6 and the average use of short-acting nitrates/week from 1.5 ± 2.8 units to 0.2 ± 1.0 units. CCS classification of patients improved from 76% classified in CCS grades II or III and 24% in CCS grade I to 66% classified in CCS grade I and only 35% remaining in CCS grades II or III at study end. Response rate to ivabradine (defined as HR <70 bpm or HR reduction ≥10 bpm) reached 87%. HR reduction, symptomatic improvement and response rates were comparable in patients with or without BB. Adverse drug reactions were reported for 2.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study over a four-month period in clinical practice, ivabradine effectively reduced HR, angina attacks, and nitrate consumption in patients with AP with or without concomitant BB therapy. Ivabradine improved CCS scores and achieved a high treatment response rate with good general tolerability. FUNDING: Servier. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com identifier, ISRCTN73861224.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50201302016-09-27 Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice Perings, Stefan Stöckl, Georg Kelm, Malte Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: In the prospective, open-label, non-interventional, multicenter RESPONSI(f)VE study, the effectiveness, response rates and tolerability of ivabradine with or without beta blocker (BB) were evaluated in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (AP) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In patients with AP, ivabradine was given twice daily in flexible doses for 4 months. Resting heart rate (HR), number of angina attacks, short-acting nitrate use, severity of symptoms [by Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score] and tolerability with or without existing BB therapy were documented and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 1250 patients with AP (mean age 66.0 ± 10.9 years, 59.6% male, 31.9% previous myocardial infarction) and an indication for ivabradine were included. Sixty-five percent of all patients received BB. Further concomitant standard medication included aspirin (74.2%), statins (69.3%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (84.2%), diuretics (40.0%), long-acting nitrates (15.7%), and calcium antagonists (21.4%). After 4 months of ivabradine treatment (mean daily dose 11.0 ± 2.7 mg), mean HR was reduced from 82.4 ± 11.8 beats per minute (bpm) to 67.1 ± 8.4 bpm. The average number of angina attacks/week decreased from 1.2 ± 1.9 to 0.1 ± 0.6 and the average use of short-acting nitrates/week from 1.5 ± 2.8 units to 0.2 ± 1.0 units. CCS classification of patients improved from 76% classified in CCS grades II or III and 24% in CCS grade I to 66% classified in CCS grade I and only 35% remaining in CCS grades II or III at study end. Response rate to ivabradine (defined as HR <70 bpm or HR reduction ≥10 bpm) reached 87%. HR reduction, symptomatic improvement and response rates were comparable in patients with or without BB. Adverse drug reactions were reported for 2.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study over a four-month period in clinical practice, ivabradine effectively reduced HR, angina attacks, and nitrate consumption in patients with AP with or without concomitant BB therapy. Ivabradine improved CCS scores and achieved a high treatment response rate with good general tolerability. FUNDING: Servier. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com identifier, ISRCTN73861224. Springer Healthcare 2016-07-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5020130/ /pubmed/27432382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0377-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Perings, Stefan
Stöckl, Georg
Kelm, Malte
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title_full Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title_short Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ivabradine with or Without Concomitant Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina in Routine Clinical Practice
title_sort effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine with or without concomitant beta-blocker therapy in patients with chronic stable angina in routine clinical practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27432382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0377-7
work_keys_str_mv AT peringsstefan effectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradinewithorwithoutconcomitantbetablockertherapyinpatientswithchronicstableanginainroutineclinicalpractice
AT stocklgeorg effectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradinewithorwithoutconcomitantbetablockertherapyinpatientswithchronicstableanginainroutineclinicalpractice
AT kelmmalte effectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradinewithorwithoutconcomitantbetablockertherapyinpatientswithchronicstableanginainroutineclinicalpractice
AT effectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradinewithorwithoutconcomitantbetablockertherapyinpatientswithchronicstableanginainroutineclinicalpractice