Cargando…
Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated strongly with an increased risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, leading to impaired quality of life and shortened life expectancy. In addition to appropriate glycemic control, multi-factorial intervention for a wide range of risk factors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7 |
_version_ | 1782453224491450368 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Atsushi Murohara, Toyoaki Taguchi, Isao Eguchi, Kazuo Suzuki, Makoto Kitakaze, Masafumi Sato, Yasunori Ishizu, Tomoko Higashi, Yukihito Yamada, Hirotsugu Nanasato, Mamoru Shimabukuro, Michio Teragawa, Hiroki Ueda, Shinichiro Kodera, Satoshi Matsuhisa, Munehide Kadokami, Toshiaki Kario, Kazuomi Nishio, Yoshihiko Inoue, Teruo Maemura, Koji Oyama, Jun-ichi Ohishi, Mitsuru Sata, Masataka Tomiyama, Hirofumi Node, Koichi |
author_facet | Tanaka, Atsushi Murohara, Toyoaki Taguchi, Isao Eguchi, Kazuo Suzuki, Makoto Kitakaze, Masafumi Sato, Yasunori Ishizu, Tomoko Higashi, Yukihito Yamada, Hirotsugu Nanasato, Mamoru Shimabukuro, Michio Teragawa, Hiroki Ueda, Shinichiro Kodera, Satoshi Matsuhisa, Munehide Kadokami, Toshiaki Kario, Kazuomi Nishio, Yoshihiko Inoue, Teruo Maemura, Koji Oyama, Jun-ichi Ohishi, Mitsuru Sata, Masataka Tomiyama, Hirofumi Node, Koichi |
author_sort | Tanaka, Atsushi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated strongly with an increased risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, leading to impaired quality of life and shortened life expectancy. In addition to appropriate glycemic control, multi-factorial intervention for a wide range of risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is crucial for management of diabetes. A recent cardiovascular outcome trial in diabetes patients with higher cardiovascular risk demonstrated that a SGLT2 inhibitor markedly reduced mortality, but not macro-vascular events. However, to date there is no clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on arteriosclerosis. The ongoing PROTECT trial was designed to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitors, ipragliflozin, prevented progression of carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 480 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a HbA1c between 6 and 10 % despite receiving diet/exercise therapy and/or standard anti-diabetic agents for at least 3 months, will be randomized systematically (1:1) into either ipragliflozin or control (continuation of conventional therapy) groups. After randomization, ipragliflozin (50–100 mg once daily) will be added on to the background therapy in participants assigned to the ipragliflozin group. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from baseline to 24 months. Images of carotid intima-media thickness will be analyzed at a central core laboratory in a blinded manner. The key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline in other parameters of carotid intima-media thickness, various metabolic parameters, and renal function. Other cardiovascular functional tests are also planned for several sub-studies. DISCUSSION: The PROTECT study is the first to assess the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis using carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker. The study has potential to clarify the protective effects of ipragliflozin on atherosclerosis. Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN000018440 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021348) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5020545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50205452016-09-14 Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study Tanaka, Atsushi Murohara, Toyoaki Taguchi, Isao Eguchi, Kazuo Suzuki, Makoto Kitakaze, Masafumi Sato, Yasunori Ishizu, Tomoko Higashi, Yukihito Yamada, Hirotsugu Nanasato, Mamoru Shimabukuro, Michio Teragawa, Hiroki Ueda, Shinichiro Kodera, Satoshi Matsuhisa, Munehide Kadokami, Toshiaki Kario, Kazuomi Nishio, Yoshihiko Inoue, Teruo Maemura, Koji Oyama, Jun-ichi Ohishi, Mitsuru Sata, Masataka Tomiyama, Hirofumi Node, Koichi Cardiovasc Diabetol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated strongly with an increased risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, leading to impaired quality of life and shortened life expectancy. In addition to appropriate glycemic control, multi-factorial intervention for a wide range of risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is crucial for management of diabetes. A recent cardiovascular outcome trial in diabetes patients with higher cardiovascular risk demonstrated that a SGLT2 inhibitor markedly reduced mortality, but not macro-vascular events. However, to date there is no clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on arteriosclerosis. The ongoing PROTECT trial was designed to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitors, ipragliflozin, prevented progression of carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 480 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a HbA1c between 6 and 10 % despite receiving diet/exercise therapy and/or standard anti-diabetic agents for at least 3 months, will be randomized systematically (1:1) into either ipragliflozin or control (continuation of conventional therapy) groups. After randomization, ipragliflozin (50–100 mg once daily) will be added on to the background therapy in participants assigned to the ipragliflozin group. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from baseline to 24 months. Images of carotid intima-media thickness will be analyzed at a central core laboratory in a blinded manner. The key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline in other parameters of carotid intima-media thickness, various metabolic parameters, and renal function. Other cardiovascular functional tests are also planned for several sub-studies. DISCUSSION: The PROTECT study is the first to assess the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis using carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker. The study has potential to clarify the protective effects of ipragliflozin on atherosclerosis. Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN000018440 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021348) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5020545/ /pubmed/27619983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tanaka, Atsushi Murohara, Toyoaki Taguchi, Isao Eguchi, Kazuo Suzuki, Makoto Kitakaze, Masafumi Sato, Yasunori Ishizu, Tomoko Higashi, Yukihito Yamada, Hirotsugu Nanasato, Mamoru Shimabukuro, Michio Teragawa, Hiroki Ueda, Shinichiro Kodera, Satoshi Matsuhisa, Munehide Kadokami, Toshiaki Kario, Kazuomi Nishio, Yoshihiko Inoue, Teruo Maemura, Koji Oyama, Jun-ichi Ohishi, Mitsuru Sata, Masataka Tomiyama, Hirofumi Node, Koichi Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title | Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title_full | Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title_short | Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study |
title_sort | rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the protect study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakaatsushi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT muroharatoyoaki rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT taguchiisao rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT eguchikazuo rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT suzukimakoto rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT kitakazemasafumi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT satoyasunori rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT ishizutomoko rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT higashiyukihito rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT yamadahirotsugu rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT nanasatomamoru rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT shimabukuromichio rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT teragawahiroki rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT uedashinichiro rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT koderasatoshi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT matsuhisamunehide rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT kadokamitoshiaki rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT kariokazuomi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT nishioyoshihiko rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT inoueteruo rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT maemurakoji rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT oyamajunichi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT ohishimitsuru rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT satamasataka rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT tomiyamahirofumi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT nodekoichi rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy AT rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethepreventiveeffectofipragliflozinoncarotidatherosclerosistheprotectstudy |