Cargando…
Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in G...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x |
_version_ | 1782453226536173568 |
---|---|
author | Le Floch, B. Bastiaens, H. Le Reste, J. Y. Lingner, H. Hoffman, R. D. Czachowski, S. Assenova, R. Koskela, T. H. Klemenc-Ketis, Z. Nabbe, P. Sowinska, A. Montier, T. Peremans, L. |
author_facet | Le Floch, B. Bastiaens, H. Le Reste, J. Y. Lingner, H. Hoffman, R. D. Czachowski, S. Assenova, R. Koskela, T. H. Klemenc-Ketis, Z. Nabbe, P. Sowinska, A. Montier, T. Peremans, L. |
author_sort | Le Floch, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in GP job satisfaction throughout Europe. The first step of this study was a literature review to explore how the satisfaction of GPs had been studied before. The research question was “Which factors are related to GP satisfaction in Clinical Practice?” METHODS: Systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement. The databases searched were Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane. All articles were identified, screened and included by two separate research teams, according to inclusion or exclusion criteria. Then, a qualitative appraisal was undertaken. Next, a thematic analysis process was undertaken to capture any issue relevant to the research question. RESULTS: The number of records screened was 458. One hundred four were eligible. Finally, 17 articles were included. The data revealed 13 subthemes, which were grouped into three major themes for GP satisfaction. First there were general profession-related themes, applicable to many professions. A second group of issues related specifically to a GP setting. Finally, a third group was related to professional life and personal issues. CONCLUSIONS: A number of factors leading to GP job satisfaction, exist in literature They should be used by policy makers within Europe to increase the GP workforce. The research team needs to undertake qualitative studies to confirm or enhance those results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5020554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50205542016-09-14 Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review Le Floch, B. Bastiaens, H. Le Reste, J. Y. Lingner, H. Hoffman, R. D. Czachowski, S. Assenova, R. Koskela, T. H. Klemenc-Ketis, Z. Nabbe, P. Sowinska, A. Montier, T. Peremans, L. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in GP job satisfaction throughout Europe. The first step of this study was a literature review to explore how the satisfaction of GPs had been studied before. The research question was “Which factors are related to GP satisfaction in Clinical Practice?” METHODS: Systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement. The databases searched were Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane. All articles were identified, screened and included by two separate research teams, according to inclusion or exclusion criteria. Then, a qualitative appraisal was undertaken. Next, a thematic analysis process was undertaken to capture any issue relevant to the research question. RESULTS: The number of records screened was 458. One hundred four were eligible. Finally, 17 articles were included. The data revealed 13 subthemes, which were grouped into three major themes for GP satisfaction. First there were general profession-related themes, applicable to many professions. A second group of issues related specifically to a GP setting. Finally, a third group was related to professional life and personal issues. CONCLUSIONS: A number of factors leading to GP job satisfaction, exist in literature They should be used by policy makers within Europe to increase the GP workforce. The research team needs to undertake qualitative studies to confirm or enhance those results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5020554/ /pubmed/27619913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Le Floch, B. Bastiaens, H. Le Reste, J. Y. Lingner, H. Hoffman, R. D. Czachowski, S. Assenova, R. Koskela, T. H. Klemenc-Ketis, Z. Nabbe, P. Sowinska, A. Montier, T. Peremans, L. Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title | Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title_full | Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title_short | Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review |
title_sort | which positive factors determine the gp satisfaction in clinical practice? a systematic literature review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leflochb whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT bastiaensh whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT lerestejy whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT lingnerh whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT hoffmanrd whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT czachowskis whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT assenovar whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT koskelath whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT klemencketisz whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT nabbep whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT sowinskaa whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT montiert whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview AT peremansl whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview |