Cargando…

Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Floch, B., Bastiaens, H., Le Reste, J. Y., Lingner, H., Hoffman, R. D., Czachowski, S., Assenova, R., Koskela, T. H., Klemenc-Ketis, Z., Nabbe, P., Sowinska, A., Montier, T., Peremans, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x
_version_ 1782453226536173568
author Le Floch, B.
Bastiaens, H.
Le Reste, J. Y.
Lingner, H.
Hoffman, R. D.
Czachowski, S.
Assenova, R.
Koskela, T. H.
Klemenc-Ketis, Z.
Nabbe, P.
Sowinska, A.
Montier, T.
Peremans, L.
author_facet Le Floch, B.
Bastiaens, H.
Le Reste, J. Y.
Lingner, H.
Hoffman, R. D.
Czachowski, S.
Assenova, R.
Koskela, T. H.
Klemenc-Ketis, Z.
Nabbe, P.
Sowinska, A.
Montier, T.
Peremans, L.
author_sort Le Floch, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in GP job satisfaction throughout Europe. The first step of this study was a literature review to explore how the satisfaction of GPs had been studied before. The research question was “Which factors are related to GP satisfaction in Clinical Practice?” METHODS: Systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement. The databases searched were Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane. All articles were identified, screened and included by two separate research teams, according to inclusion or exclusion criteria. Then, a qualitative appraisal was undertaken. Next, a thematic analysis process was undertaken to capture any issue relevant to the research question. RESULTS: The number of records screened was 458. One hundred four were eligible. Finally, 17 articles were included. The data revealed 13 subthemes, which were grouped into three major themes for GP satisfaction. First there were general profession-related themes, applicable to many professions. A second group of issues related specifically to a GP setting. Finally, a third group was related to professional life and personal issues. CONCLUSIONS: A number of factors leading to GP job satisfaction, exist in literature They should be used by policy makers within Europe to increase the GP workforce. The research team needs to undertake qualitative studies to confirm or enhance those results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50205542016-09-14 Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review Le Floch, B. Bastiaens, H. Le Reste, J. Y. Lingner, H. Hoffman, R. D. Czachowski, S. Assenova, R. Koskela, T. H. Klemenc-Ketis, Z. Nabbe, P. Sowinska, A. Montier, T. Peremans, L. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Looking at what makes General Practitioners (GPs) happy in their profession, may be important in increasing the GP workforce in the future. The European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) created a research team (eight national groups) in order to clarify the factors involved in GP job satisfaction throughout Europe. The first step of this study was a literature review to explore how the satisfaction of GPs had been studied before. The research question was “Which factors are related to GP satisfaction in Clinical Practice?” METHODS: Systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement. The databases searched were Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane. All articles were identified, screened and included by two separate research teams, according to inclusion or exclusion criteria. Then, a qualitative appraisal was undertaken. Next, a thematic analysis process was undertaken to capture any issue relevant to the research question. RESULTS: The number of records screened was 458. One hundred four were eligible. Finally, 17 articles were included. The data revealed 13 subthemes, which were grouped into three major themes for GP satisfaction. First there were general profession-related themes, applicable to many professions. A second group of issues related specifically to a GP setting. Finally, a third group was related to professional life and personal issues. CONCLUSIONS: A number of factors leading to GP job satisfaction, exist in literature They should be used by policy makers within Europe to increase the GP workforce. The research team needs to undertake qualitative studies to confirm or enhance those results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5020554/ /pubmed/27619913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Floch, B.
Bastiaens, H.
Le Reste, J. Y.
Lingner, H.
Hoffman, R. D.
Czachowski, S.
Assenova, R.
Koskela, T. H.
Klemenc-Ketis, Z.
Nabbe, P.
Sowinska, A.
Montier, T.
Peremans, L.
Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title_full Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title_short Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
title_sort which positive factors determine the gp satisfaction in clinical practice? a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x
work_keys_str_mv AT leflochb whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT bastiaensh whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT lerestejy whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT lingnerh whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT hoffmanrd whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT czachowskis whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT assenovar whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT koskelath whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT klemencketisz whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT nabbep whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT sowinskaa whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT montiert whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview
AT peremansl whichpositivefactorsdeterminethegpsatisfactioninclinicalpracticeasystematicliteraturereview