Cargando…

Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia

OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Lauren J, Eapen, Valsamma, Maybery, Murray T, Midford, Sue, Paynter, Jessica, Quarmby, Lyndsay, Smith, Timothy, Williams, Katrina, Whitehouse, Andrew J O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517
_version_ 1782453245667442688
author Taylor, Lauren J
Eapen, Valsamma
Maybery, Murray T
Midford, Sue
Paynter, Jessica
Quarmby, Lyndsay
Smith, Timothy
Williams, Katrina
Whitehouse, Andrew J O
author_facet Taylor, Lauren J
Eapen, Valsamma
Maybery, Murray T
Midford, Sue
Paynter, Jessica
Quarmby, Lyndsay
Smith, Timothy
Williams, Katrina
Whitehouse, Andrew J O
author_sort Taylor, Lauren J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practices across the nation by surveying all relevant professional groups. DESIGN: In this study, we completed a survey of 173 health professionals whose clinical practice includes participating in the diagnostic process for ASD in Australia. Participants completed an online questionnaire which included questions about their diagnostic setting, diagnostic practice and diagnostic outcomes in 2014–2015. PARTICIPANTS: Participants covered a range of disciplines including paediatrics, psychiatry, psychology, speech pathology and occupational therapy. All states and territories of Australia were represented. SETTING: Participants came from a range of service settings which included hospitals, non-governmental organisations, publicly funded diagnostic services and private practice. RESULTS: There was variability in diagnostic practices for ASD in Australia. While some clinicians work within a multidisciplinary assessment team, others practice independently and rarely collaborate with other clinicians to make a diagnostic decision. Only half of the respondents reported that they include a standardised objective assessment tool such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in ASD assessments, and one-third indicated that they do not include measures of development, cognition and language in assessments where ASD is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Reported practice of some professionals in Australia may not be consistent with international best practice guidelines for ASD diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for a minimum national standard for ASD diagnosis throughout Australia that ensures best practice regardless of the type of setting in which the service is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50206602016-09-20 Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia Taylor, Lauren J Eapen, Valsamma Maybery, Murray T Midford, Sue Paynter, Jessica Quarmby, Lyndsay Smith, Timothy Williams, Katrina Whitehouse, Andrew J O BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practices across the nation by surveying all relevant professional groups. DESIGN: In this study, we completed a survey of 173 health professionals whose clinical practice includes participating in the diagnostic process for ASD in Australia. Participants completed an online questionnaire which included questions about their diagnostic setting, diagnostic practice and diagnostic outcomes in 2014–2015. PARTICIPANTS: Participants covered a range of disciplines including paediatrics, psychiatry, psychology, speech pathology and occupational therapy. All states and territories of Australia were represented. SETTING: Participants came from a range of service settings which included hospitals, non-governmental organisations, publicly funded diagnostic services and private practice. RESULTS: There was variability in diagnostic practices for ASD in Australia. While some clinicians work within a multidisciplinary assessment team, others practice independently and rarely collaborate with other clinicians to make a diagnostic decision. Only half of the respondents reported that they include a standardised objective assessment tool such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in ASD assessments, and one-third indicated that they do not include measures of development, cognition and language in assessments where ASD is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Reported practice of some professionals in Australia may not be consistent with international best practice guidelines for ASD diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for a minimum national standard for ASD diagnosis throughout Australia that ensures best practice regardless of the type of setting in which the service is provided. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5020660/ /pubmed/27601502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Taylor, Lauren J
Eapen, Valsamma
Maybery, Murray T
Midford, Sue
Paynter, Jessica
Quarmby, Lyndsay
Smith, Timothy
Williams, Katrina
Whitehouse, Andrew J O
Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title_full Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title_fullStr Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title_short Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
title_sort diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in australia
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorlaurenj diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT eapenvalsamma diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT mayberymurrayt diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT midfordsue diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT paynterjessica diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT quarmbylyndsay diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT smithtimothy diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT williamskatrina diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia
AT whitehouseandrewjo diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia