Cargando…
Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia
OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517 |
_version_ | 1782453245667442688 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Lauren J Eapen, Valsamma Maybery, Murray T Midford, Sue Paynter, Jessica Quarmby, Lyndsay Smith, Timothy Williams, Katrina Whitehouse, Andrew J O |
author_facet | Taylor, Lauren J Eapen, Valsamma Maybery, Murray T Midford, Sue Paynter, Jessica Quarmby, Lyndsay Smith, Timothy Williams, Katrina Whitehouse, Andrew J O |
author_sort | Taylor, Lauren J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practices across the nation by surveying all relevant professional groups. DESIGN: In this study, we completed a survey of 173 health professionals whose clinical practice includes participating in the diagnostic process for ASD in Australia. Participants completed an online questionnaire which included questions about their diagnostic setting, diagnostic practice and diagnostic outcomes in 2014–2015. PARTICIPANTS: Participants covered a range of disciplines including paediatrics, psychiatry, psychology, speech pathology and occupational therapy. All states and territories of Australia were represented. SETTING: Participants came from a range of service settings which included hospitals, non-governmental organisations, publicly funded diagnostic services and private practice. RESULTS: There was variability in diagnostic practices for ASD in Australia. While some clinicians work within a multidisciplinary assessment team, others practice independently and rarely collaborate with other clinicians to make a diagnostic decision. Only half of the respondents reported that they include a standardised objective assessment tool such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in ASD assessments, and one-third indicated that they do not include measures of development, cognition and language in assessments where ASD is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Reported practice of some professionals in Australia may not be consistent with international best practice guidelines for ASD diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for a minimum national standard for ASD diagnosis throughout Australia that ensures best practice regardless of the type of setting in which the service is provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5020660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50206602016-09-20 Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia Taylor, Lauren J Eapen, Valsamma Maybery, Murray T Midford, Sue Paynter, Jessica Quarmby, Lyndsay Smith, Timothy Williams, Katrina Whitehouse, Andrew J O BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: There is currently no agreed Australian standard for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) even though there are specific diagnostic services available. We suspected inconsistency in the diagnostic practices of health professionals in Australia and aimed to assess these practices across the nation by surveying all relevant professional groups. DESIGN: In this study, we completed a survey of 173 health professionals whose clinical practice includes participating in the diagnostic process for ASD in Australia. Participants completed an online questionnaire which included questions about their diagnostic setting, diagnostic practice and diagnostic outcomes in 2014–2015. PARTICIPANTS: Participants covered a range of disciplines including paediatrics, psychiatry, psychology, speech pathology and occupational therapy. All states and territories of Australia were represented. SETTING: Participants came from a range of service settings which included hospitals, non-governmental organisations, publicly funded diagnostic services and private practice. RESULTS: There was variability in diagnostic practices for ASD in Australia. While some clinicians work within a multidisciplinary assessment team, others practice independently and rarely collaborate with other clinicians to make a diagnostic decision. Only half of the respondents reported that they include a standardised objective assessment tool such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in ASD assessments, and one-third indicated that they do not include measures of development, cognition and language in assessments where ASD is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Reported practice of some professionals in Australia may not be consistent with international best practice guidelines for ASD diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for a minimum national standard for ASD diagnosis throughout Australia that ensures best practice regardless of the type of setting in which the service is provided. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5020660/ /pubmed/27601502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Taylor, Lauren J Eapen, Valsamma Maybery, Murray T Midford, Sue Paynter, Jessica Quarmby, Lyndsay Smith, Timothy Williams, Katrina Whitehouse, Andrew J O Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title | Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title_full | Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title_short | Diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in Australia |
title_sort | diagnostic evaluation for autism spectrum disorder: a survey of health professionals in australia |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorlaurenj diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT eapenvalsamma diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT mayberymurrayt diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT midfordsue diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT paynterjessica diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT quarmbylyndsay diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT smithtimothy diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT williamskatrina diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia AT whitehouseandrewjo diagnosticevaluationforautismspectrumdisorderasurveyofhealthprofessionalsinaustralia |