Cargando…

Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities

INTRODUCTION: Until now, industry and government stakeholders have dominated public discourse about policy options for obesity. While consumer involvement in health service delivery and research has been embraced, methods which engage consumers in health policy development are lacking. Conflicting p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haynes, Emily, Palermo, Claire, Reidlinger, Dianne P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011788
_version_ 1782453256441561088
author Haynes, Emily
Palermo, Claire
Reidlinger, Dianne P
author_facet Haynes, Emily
Palermo, Claire
Reidlinger, Dianne P
author_sort Haynes, Emily
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Until now, industry and government stakeholders have dominated public discourse about policy options for obesity. While consumer involvement in health service delivery and research has been embraced, methods which engage consumers in health policy development are lacking. Conflicting priorities have generated ethical concern around obesity policy. The concept of ‘intrusiveness’ has been applied to policy decisions in the UK, whereby ethical implications are considered through level of intrusiveness to choice; however, the concept has also been used to avert government regulation to address obesity. The concept of intrusiveness has not been explored from a stakeholder's perspective. The aim is to investigate the relevance of intrusiveness and autonomy to health policy development, and to explore consensus on obesity policy priorities of under-represented stakeholders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Policy-Delphi technique will be modified using the James Lind Alliance approach to collaborative priority setting. A total of 60 participants will be recruited to represent three stakeholder groups in the Australian context: consumers, public health practitioners and policymakers. A three-round online Policy-Delphi survey will be undertaken. Participants will prioritise options informed by submissions to the 2009 Australian Government Inquiry into Obesity, and rate the intrusiveness of those proposed. An additional round will use qualitative methods in a face-to-face discussion group to explore stakeholder perceptions of the intrusiveness of options. The novelty of this methodology will redress the balance by bringing the consumer voice forward to identify ethically acceptable obesity policy options. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Bond University Health Research Ethics Committee. The findings will inform development of a conceptual framework for analysing and prioritising obesity policy options, which will be relevant internationally and to ethical considerations of wider public health issues. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and collaborative platforms of policy and science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50207382016-09-20 Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities Haynes, Emily Palermo, Claire Reidlinger, Dianne P BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Until now, industry and government stakeholders have dominated public discourse about policy options for obesity. While consumer involvement in health service delivery and research has been embraced, methods which engage consumers in health policy development are lacking. Conflicting priorities have generated ethical concern around obesity policy. The concept of ‘intrusiveness’ has been applied to policy decisions in the UK, whereby ethical implications are considered through level of intrusiveness to choice; however, the concept has also been used to avert government regulation to address obesity. The concept of intrusiveness has not been explored from a stakeholder's perspective. The aim is to investigate the relevance of intrusiveness and autonomy to health policy development, and to explore consensus on obesity policy priorities of under-represented stakeholders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Policy-Delphi technique will be modified using the James Lind Alliance approach to collaborative priority setting. A total of 60 participants will be recruited to represent three stakeholder groups in the Australian context: consumers, public health practitioners and policymakers. A three-round online Policy-Delphi survey will be undertaken. Participants will prioritise options informed by submissions to the 2009 Australian Government Inquiry into Obesity, and rate the intrusiveness of those proposed. An additional round will use qualitative methods in a face-to-face discussion group to explore stakeholder perceptions of the intrusiveness of options. The novelty of this methodology will redress the balance by bringing the consumer voice forward to identify ethically acceptable obesity policy options. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Bond University Health Research Ethics Committee. The findings will inform development of a conceptual framework for analysing and prioritising obesity policy options, which will be relevant internationally and to ethical considerations of wider public health issues. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and collaborative platforms of policy and science. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5020738/ /pubmed/27601495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011788 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Haynes, Emily
Palermo, Claire
Reidlinger, Dianne P
Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title_full Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title_fullStr Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title_full_unstemmed Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title_short Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
title_sort modified policy-delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011788
work_keys_str_mv AT haynesemily modifiedpolicydelphistudyforexploringobesitypreventionpriorities
AT palermoclaire modifiedpolicydelphistudyforexploringobesitypreventionpriorities
AT reidlingerdiannep modifiedpolicydelphistudyforexploringobesitypreventionpriorities