Cargando…

‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors

OBJECTIVES: An increase in patients with long-term conditions and complex care needs presents new challenges to healthcare providers around the developed world. In response, more broad-based training programmes have developed to better prepare trainees for the changing landscape of healthcare delive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muddiman, E, Bullock, A D, MacDonald, J, Allery, L, Webb, K L, Pugsley, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239
_version_ 1782453259132207104
author Muddiman, E
Bullock, A D
MacDonald, J
Allery, L
Webb, K L
Pugsley, L
author_facet Muddiman, E
Bullock, A D
MacDonald, J
Allery, L
Webb, K L
Pugsley, L
author_sort Muddiman, E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: An increase in patients with long-term conditions and complex care needs presents new challenges to healthcare providers around the developed world. In response, more broad-based training programmes have developed to better prepare trainees for the changing landscape of healthcare delivery. This paper focuses on qualitative elements of a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the postgraduate, post-Foundation Broad-Based Training (BBT) programme in England. It aims to provide a qualitative analysis of trainees' evaluations of whether the programme meets its intentions to develop practitioners adept at managing complex cases, patient focused care, specialty integration and conviction in career choice. We also identify unintended consequences. SETTING: 9 focus groups of BBT trainees were held over a 12-month period. Discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to directed content analysis. Data were collected from trainees across all 7 participating regions: East Midlands; West Midlands; Severn; Northern; North Western; Yorkshire and Humber; Kent, Surry and Sussex. PARTICIPANTS: Focus group participants (61 in total) from the first and second cohorts of BBT. RESULTS: Evidence from trainees indicated that the programme was meeting its aims: trainees valued the extra time to decide on their onward career specialty, having a wider experience and developing a more integrated perspective. They thought of themselves as different and perceived that others they worked alongside also saw them as different. Being different meant benefitting from novel training experiences and opportunities for self-development. However, unintended consequences were feelings of isolation, and uncertainty about professional identity. CONCLUSIONS: By spanning boundaries between specialties, trainee generalists have the potential to improve experiences and outcomes for patients with complex health needs. However, the sense of isolation will inhibit this potential. We employ the concept of ‘belongingness’ to identify challenges related to the implementation of generalist training programmes within existing structures of healthcare provision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50207512016-09-20 ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors Muddiman, E Bullock, A D MacDonald, J Allery, L Webb, K L Pugsley, L BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: An increase in patients with long-term conditions and complex care needs presents new challenges to healthcare providers around the developed world. In response, more broad-based training programmes have developed to better prepare trainees for the changing landscape of healthcare delivery. This paper focuses on qualitative elements of a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the postgraduate, post-Foundation Broad-Based Training (BBT) programme in England. It aims to provide a qualitative analysis of trainees' evaluations of whether the programme meets its intentions to develop practitioners adept at managing complex cases, patient focused care, specialty integration and conviction in career choice. We also identify unintended consequences. SETTING: 9 focus groups of BBT trainees were held over a 12-month period. Discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to directed content analysis. Data were collected from trainees across all 7 participating regions: East Midlands; West Midlands; Severn; Northern; North Western; Yorkshire and Humber; Kent, Surry and Sussex. PARTICIPANTS: Focus group participants (61 in total) from the first and second cohorts of BBT. RESULTS: Evidence from trainees indicated that the programme was meeting its aims: trainees valued the extra time to decide on their onward career specialty, having a wider experience and developing a more integrated perspective. They thought of themselves as different and perceived that others they worked alongside also saw them as different. Being different meant benefitting from novel training experiences and opportunities for self-development. However, unintended consequences were feelings of isolation, and uncertainty about professional identity. CONCLUSIONS: By spanning boundaries between specialties, trainee generalists have the potential to improve experiences and outcomes for patients with complex health needs. However, the sense of isolation will inhibit this potential. We employ the concept of ‘belongingness’ to identify challenges related to the implementation of generalist training programmes within existing structures of healthcare provision. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5020751/ /pubmed/27601487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Muddiman, E
Bullock, A D
MacDonald, J
Allery, L
Webb, K L
Pugsley, L
‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title_full ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title_fullStr ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title_full_unstemmed ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title_short ‘It's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
title_sort ‘it's surprising how differently they treat you’: a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239
work_keys_str_mv AT muddimane itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors
AT bullockad itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors
AT macdonaldj itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors
AT alleryl itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors
AT webbkl itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors
AT pugsleyl itssurprisinghowdifferentlytheytreatyouaqualitativeanalysisoftraineereflectionsonanewprogrammeforgeneralistdoctors