Cargando…

Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study

OBJECTIVES: In many countries, minority ethnic groups report poorer care in patient surveys. This could be because they get worse care or because they respond differently to such surveys. We conducted an experiment to determine whether South Asian people in England rate simulated GP consultations th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burt, Jenni, Abel, Gary, Elmore, Natasha, Lloyd, Cathy, Benson, John, Sarson, Lara, Carluccio, Anna, Campbell, John, Elliott, Marc N, Roland, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011256
_version_ 1782453277268377600
author Burt, Jenni
Abel, Gary
Elmore, Natasha
Lloyd, Cathy
Benson, John
Sarson, Lara
Carluccio, Anna
Campbell, John
Elliott, Marc N
Roland, Martin
author_facet Burt, Jenni
Abel, Gary
Elmore, Natasha
Lloyd, Cathy
Benson, John
Sarson, Lara
Carluccio, Anna
Campbell, John
Elliott, Marc N
Roland, Martin
author_sort Burt, Jenni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In many countries, minority ethnic groups report poorer care in patient surveys. This could be because they get worse care or because they respond differently to such surveys. We conducted an experiment to determine whether South Asian people in England rate simulated GP consultations the same or differently from White British people. If these groups rate consultations similarly when viewing identical simulated consultations, it would be more likely that the lower scores reported by minority ethnic groups in real surveys reflect real differences in quality of care. DESIGN: Experimental vignette study. Trained fieldworkers completed computer-assisted personal interviews during which participants rated 3 video recordings of simulated GP–patient consultations, using 5 communication items from the English GP Patient Survey. Consultations were shown in a random order, selected from a pool of 16. SETTING: Geographically confined areas of ∼130 households (output areas) in England, selected using proportional systematic sampling. PARTICIPANTS: 564 White British and 564 Pakistani adults recruited using an in-home face-to-face approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean differences in communication score (on a scale of 0–100) between White British and Pakistani participants, estimated from linear regression. RESULTS: Pakistani participants, on average, scored consultations 9.8 points higher than White British participants (95% CI 8.0 to 11.7, p<0.001) when viewing the same consultations. When adjusted for age, gender, deprivation, self-rated health and video, the difference increased to 11.0 points (95% CI 8.5 to 13.6, p<0.001). The largest differences were seen when participants were older (>55) and where communication was scripted to be poor. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in ratings were found between groups, with Pakistani respondents giving higher scores than White British respondents to videos showing the same care. Our findings suggest that the lower scores reported by Pakistani patients in national surveys represent genuinely worse experiences of communication compared to the White British majority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50208402016-09-20 Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study Burt, Jenni Abel, Gary Elmore, Natasha Lloyd, Cathy Benson, John Sarson, Lara Carluccio, Anna Campbell, John Elliott, Marc N Roland, Martin BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: In many countries, minority ethnic groups report poorer care in patient surveys. This could be because they get worse care or because they respond differently to such surveys. We conducted an experiment to determine whether South Asian people in England rate simulated GP consultations the same or differently from White British people. If these groups rate consultations similarly when viewing identical simulated consultations, it would be more likely that the lower scores reported by minority ethnic groups in real surveys reflect real differences in quality of care. DESIGN: Experimental vignette study. Trained fieldworkers completed computer-assisted personal interviews during which participants rated 3 video recordings of simulated GP–patient consultations, using 5 communication items from the English GP Patient Survey. Consultations were shown in a random order, selected from a pool of 16. SETTING: Geographically confined areas of ∼130 households (output areas) in England, selected using proportional systematic sampling. PARTICIPANTS: 564 White British and 564 Pakistani adults recruited using an in-home face-to-face approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean differences in communication score (on a scale of 0–100) between White British and Pakistani participants, estimated from linear regression. RESULTS: Pakistani participants, on average, scored consultations 9.8 points higher than White British participants (95% CI 8.0 to 11.7, p<0.001) when viewing the same consultations. When adjusted for age, gender, deprivation, self-rated health and video, the difference increased to 11.0 points (95% CI 8.5 to 13.6, p<0.001). The largest differences were seen when participants were older (>55) and where communication was scripted to be poor. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in ratings were found between groups, with Pakistani respondents giving higher scores than White British respondents to videos showing the same care. Our findings suggest that the lower scores reported by Pakistani patients in national surveys represent genuinely worse experiences of communication compared to the White British majority. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5020840/ /pubmed/27609844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011256 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Burt, Jenni
Abel, Gary
Elmore, Natasha
Lloyd, Cathy
Benson, John
Sarson, Lara
Carluccio, Anna
Campbell, John
Elliott, Marc N
Roland, Martin
Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title_full Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title_fullStr Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title_short Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study
title_sort understanding negative feedback from south asian patients: an experimental vignette study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011256
work_keys_str_mv AT burtjenni understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT abelgary understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT elmorenatasha understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT lloydcathy understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT bensonjohn understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT sarsonlara understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT carluccioanna understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT campbelljohn understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT elliottmarcn understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT rolandmartin understandingnegativefeedbackfromsouthasianpatientsanexperimentalvignettestudy