Cargando…

Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate functional outcomes, care needs and cost-efficiency of hyperacute (HA) rehabilitation for a cohort of in-patients with complex neurological disability and unstable medical/surgical conditions. DESIGN: A multicentre cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner-Stokes, Lynne, Bavikatte, Ganesh, Williams, Heather, Bill, Alan, Sephton, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012112
_version_ 1782453277503258624
author Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Bavikatte, Ganesh
Williams, Heather
Bill, Alan
Sephton, Keith
author_facet Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Bavikatte, Ganesh
Williams, Heather
Bill, Alan
Sephton, Keith
author_sort Turner-Stokes, Lynne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate functional outcomes, care needs and cost-efficiency of hyperacute (HA) rehabilitation for a cohort of in-patients with complex neurological disability and unstable medical/surgical conditions. DESIGN: A multicentre cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative (UKROC) national clinical database, 2012–2015. SETTING: Two HA specialist rehabilitation services in England, providing different service models for HA rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to each of the units with an admission rehabilitation complexity M score of ≥3 (N=190; mean age 46 (SD16) years; males:females 63:37%). Diagnoses were acquired brain injury (n=166; 87%), spinal cord injury (n=9; 5%), peripheral neurological conditions (n=9; 5%) and other (n=6; 3%). INTERVENTION: Specialist in-patient multidisciplinary rehabilitation combined with management and stabilisation of intercurrent medical and surgical problems. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation complexity and medical acuity: Rehabilitation Complexity Scale—version 13. Dependency and care costs: Northwick Park Dependency Scale/Care Needs Assessment (NPDS/NPCNA). Functional independence: UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM). Primary outcomes: (1) reduction in dependency and (2) cost-efficiency, measured as the time taken to offset rehabilitation costs by savings in NPCNA-estimated costs of on-going care in the community. RESULTS: The mean length of stay was 103 (SD66) days. Some differences were observed between the two units, which were in keeping with the different service models. However, both units showed a significant reduction in dependency and acuity between admission and discharge on all measures (Wilcoxon: p<0.001). For the 180 (95%) patients with complete NPCNA data, the mean episode cost was £77 119 (bootstrapped 95% CI £70 614 to £83 894) and the mean reduction in ‘weekly care costs’ was £462/week (95% CI 349 to 582). The mean time to offset the cost of rehabilitation was 27.6 months (95% CI 13.2 to 43.8). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its relatively high initial cost, specialist HA rehabilitation can be highly cost-efficient, producing substantial savings in on-going care costs, and relieving pressure in the acute care services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50208412016-09-20 Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis Turner-Stokes, Lynne Bavikatte, Ganesh Williams, Heather Bill, Alan Sephton, Keith BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To evaluate functional outcomes, care needs and cost-efficiency of hyperacute (HA) rehabilitation for a cohort of in-patients with complex neurological disability and unstable medical/surgical conditions. DESIGN: A multicentre cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative (UKROC) national clinical database, 2012–2015. SETTING: Two HA specialist rehabilitation services in England, providing different service models for HA rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to each of the units with an admission rehabilitation complexity M score of ≥3 (N=190; mean age 46 (SD16) years; males:females 63:37%). Diagnoses were acquired brain injury (n=166; 87%), spinal cord injury (n=9; 5%), peripheral neurological conditions (n=9; 5%) and other (n=6; 3%). INTERVENTION: Specialist in-patient multidisciplinary rehabilitation combined with management and stabilisation of intercurrent medical and surgical problems. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation complexity and medical acuity: Rehabilitation Complexity Scale—version 13. Dependency and care costs: Northwick Park Dependency Scale/Care Needs Assessment (NPDS/NPCNA). Functional independence: UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM). Primary outcomes: (1) reduction in dependency and (2) cost-efficiency, measured as the time taken to offset rehabilitation costs by savings in NPCNA-estimated costs of on-going care in the community. RESULTS: The mean length of stay was 103 (SD66) days. Some differences were observed between the two units, which were in keeping with the different service models. However, both units showed a significant reduction in dependency and acuity between admission and discharge on all measures (Wilcoxon: p<0.001). For the 180 (95%) patients with complete NPCNA data, the mean episode cost was £77 119 (bootstrapped 95% CI £70 614 to £83 894) and the mean reduction in ‘weekly care costs’ was £462/week (95% CI 349 to 582). The mean time to offset the cost of rehabilitation was 27.6 months (95% CI 13.2 to 43.8). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its relatively high initial cost, specialist HA rehabilitation can be highly cost-efficient, producing substantial savings in on-going care costs, and relieving pressure in the acute care services. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5020841/ /pubmed/27609852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012112 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Bavikatte, Ganesh
Williams, Heather
Bill, Alan
Sephton, Keith
Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title_full Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title_fullStr Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title_short Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
title_sort cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012112
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerstokeslynne costefficiencyofspecialisthyperacuteinpatientrehabilitationservicesformedicallyunstablepatientswithcomplexrehabilitationneedsaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT bavikatteganesh costefficiencyofspecialisthyperacuteinpatientrehabilitationservicesformedicallyunstablepatientswithcomplexrehabilitationneedsaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT williamsheather costefficiencyofspecialisthyperacuteinpatientrehabilitationservicesformedicallyunstablepatientswithcomplexrehabilitationneedsaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT billalan costefficiencyofspecialisthyperacuteinpatientrehabilitationservicesformedicallyunstablepatientswithcomplexrehabilitationneedsaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT sephtonkeith costefficiencyofspecialisthyperacuteinpatientrehabilitationservicesformedicallyunstablepatientswithcomplexrehabilitationneedsaprospectivecohortanalysis