Cargando…

PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique

OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the quality of prescribing for children in primary care. Several prescribing criteria (indicators) have been developed to assess the appropriateness of prescribing in older and middle-aged adults but few are relevant to children. The objective of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barry, Emma, O'Brien, Kirsty, Moriarty, Frank, Cooper, Janine, Redmond, Patrick, Hughes, Carmel M, Bennett, Kathleen, Fahey, Tom, Smith, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012079
_version_ 1782453278207901696
author Barry, Emma
O'Brien, Kirsty
Moriarty, Frank
Cooper, Janine
Redmond, Patrick
Hughes, Carmel M
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Smith, Susan M
author_facet Barry, Emma
O'Brien, Kirsty
Moriarty, Frank
Cooper, Janine
Redmond, Patrick
Hughes, Carmel M
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Smith, Susan M
author_sort Barry, Emma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the quality of prescribing for children in primary care. Several prescribing criteria (indicators) have been developed to assess the appropriateness of prescribing in older and middle-aged adults but few are relevant to children. The objective of this study was to develop a set of prescribing indicators that can be applied to prescribing or dispensing data sets to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care settings. DESIGN: Two-round modified Delphi consensus method. SETTING: Irish and UK general practice. PARTICIPANTS: A project steering group consisting of academic and clinical general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists was formed to develop a list of indicators from literature review and clinical expertise. 15 experts consisting of GPs, pharmacists and paediatricians from the Republic of Ireland and the UK formed the Delphi panel. RESULTS: 47 indicators were reviewed by the project steering group and 16 were presented to the Delphi panel. In the first round of this exercise, consensus was achieved on nine of these indicators. Of the remaining seven indicators, two were removed following review of expert panel comments and discussion of the project steering group. The second round of the Delphi process focused on the remaining five indicators, which were amended based on first round feedback. Three indicators were accepted following the second round of the Delphi process and the remaining two indicators were removed. The final list consisted of 12 indicators categorised by respiratory system (n=6), gastrointestinal system (n=2), neurological system (n=2) and dermatological system (n=2). CONCLUSIONS: The PIPc indicators are a set of prescribing criteria developed for use in children in primary care in the absence of clinical information. The utility of these criteria will be tested in further studies using prescribing databases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50208442016-09-20 PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique Barry, Emma O'Brien, Kirsty Moriarty, Frank Cooper, Janine Redmond, Patrick Hughes, Carmel M Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Smith, Susan M BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the quality of prescribing for children in primary care. Several prescribing criteria (indicators) have been developed to assess the appropriateness of prescribing in older and middle-aged adults but few are relevant to children. The objective of this study was to develop a set of prescribing indicators that can be applied to prescribing or dispensing data sets to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care settings. DESIGN: Two-round modified Delphi consensus method. SETTING: Irish and UK general practice. PARTICIPANTS: A project steering group consisting of academic and clinical general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists was formed to develop a list of indicators from literature review and clinical expertise. 15 experts consisting of GPs, pharmacists and paediatricians from the Republic of Ireland and the UK formed the Delphi panel. RESULTS: 47 indicators were reviewed by the project steering group and 16 were presented to the Delphi panel. In the first round of this exercise, consensus was achieved on nine of these indicators. Of the remaining seven indicators, two were removed following review of expert panel comments and discussion of the project steering group. The second round of the Delphi process focused on the remaining five indicators, which were amended based on first round feedback. Three indicators were accepted following the second round of the Delphi process and the remaining two indicators were removed. The final list consisted of 12 indicators categorised by respiratory system (n=6), gastrointestinal system (n=2), neurological system (n=2) and dermatological system (n=2). CONCLUSIONS: The PIPc indicators are a set of prescribing criteria developed for use in children in primary care in the absence of clinical information. The utility of these criteria will be tested in further studies using prescribing databases. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5020844/ /pubmed/27601499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012079 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Barry, Emma
O'Brien, Kirsty
Moriarty, Frank
Cooper, Janine
Redmond, Patrick
Hughes, Carmel M
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Smith, Susan M
PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title_full PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title_fullStr PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title_full_unstemmed PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title_short PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
title_sort pipc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (pipc) in primary care using a modified delphi technique
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012079
work_keys_str_mv AT barryemma pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT obrienkirsty pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT moriartyfrank pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT cooperjanine pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT redmondpatrick pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT hughescarmelm pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT bennettkathleen pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT faheytom pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique
AT smithsusanm pipcstudydevelopmentofindicatorsofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginchildrenpipcinprimarycareusingamodifieddelphitechnique