Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies

INTRODUCTION: Patients and the public are beginning to use digital health tools to assist in managing chronic illness, support independent living and self-care, and remain connected to health and care providers. However, engaging with and enrolling in digital health interventions, such as telehealth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor, Siobhan, Hanlon, Peter, O'Donnell, Catherine A, Garcia, Sonia, Glanville, Julie, Mair, Frances S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27591017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010895
_version_ 1782453280981385216
author O'Connor, Siobhan
Hanlon, Peter
O'Donnell, Catherine A
Garcia, Sonia
Glanville, Julie
Mair, Frances S
author_facet O'Connor, Siobhan
Hanlon, Peter
O'Donnell, Catherine A
Garcia, Sonia
Glanville, Julie
Mair, Frances S
author_sort O'Connor, Siobhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients and the public are beginning to use digital health tools to assist in managing chronic illness, support independent living and self-care, and remain connected to health and care providers. However, engaging with and enrolling in digital health interventions, such as telehealth systems, mobile health applications, patient portals and personal health records, in order to use them varies considerably. Many factors affect people's ability to engage with and sign up to digital health platforms. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to identify the barriers and facilitators patients and the public experience to engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions. The secondary aim is to identify engagement and enrolment strategies, leading if possible to a taxonomy of such approaches, and a conceptual framework of digital health engagement and recruitment processes. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies will be conducted by searching six databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the ACM Digital Library for papers published between 2000 and 2015. Titles and abstracts along with full-text papers will be screened by two independent reviewers against predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A data extraction form will be used to provide details of the included studies. Quality assessment will be conducted using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with an independent third reviewer. Analysis will be guided by framework synthesis and informed by normalization process theory and burden of treatment theory, to aid conceptualisation of digital health engagement and recruitment processes. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of qualitative studies will explore factors affecting engagement and enrolment in digital health interventions. It will advance our understanding of readiness for digital health by examining the complex factors that affect patients’ and the public's ability to take part. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029846.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5020860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50208602016-09-20 Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies O'Connor, Siobhan Hanlon, Peter O'Donnell, Catherine A Garcia, Sonia Glanville, Julie Mair, Frances S BMJ Open Health Informatics INTRODUCTION: Patients and the public are beginning to use digital health tools to assist in managing chronic illness, support independent living and self-care, and remain connected to health and care providers. However, engaging with and enrolling in digital health interventions, such as telehealth systems, mobile health applications, patient portals and personal health records, in order to use them varies considerably. Many factors affect people's ability to engage with and sign up to digital health platforms. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to identify the barriers and facilitators patients and the public experience to engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions. The secondary aim is to identify engagement and enrolment strategies, leading if possible to a taxonomy of such approaches, and a conceptual framework of digital health engagement and recruitment processes. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies will be conducted by searching six databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the ACM Digital Library for papers published between 2000 and 2015. Titles and abstracts along with full-text papers will be screened by two independent reviewers against predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A data extraction form will be used to provide details of the included studies. Quality assessment will be conducted using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with an independent third reviewer. Analysis will be guided by framework synthesis and informed by normalization process theory and burden of treatment theory, to aid conceptualisation of digital health engagement and recruitment processes. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of qualitative studies will explore factors affecting engagement and enrolment in digital health interventions. It will advance our understanding of readiness for digital health by examining the complex factors that affect patients’ and the public's ability to take part. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029846. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5020860/ /pubmed/27591017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010895 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Informatics
O'Connor, Siobhan
Hanlon, Peter
O'Donnell, Catherine A
Garcia, Sonia
Glanville, Julie
Mair, Frances S
Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title_short Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
title_sort barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies
topic Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27591017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010895
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorsiobhan barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT hanlonpeter barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT odonnellcatherinea barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT garciasonia barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT glanvillejulie barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT mairfrancess barriersandfacilitatorstopatientandpublicengagementandrecruitmenttodigitalhealthinterventionsprotocolofasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies