Cargando…

Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods

PURPOSE: Pre‐licensure studies have limited ability to detect rare adverse events (AEs) to vaccines, requiring timely post‐licensure studies. With the increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using these data has emerged as an option. We r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leite, Andreia, Andrews, Nick J., Thomas, Sara L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3966
_version_ 1782453301312225280
author Leite, Andreia
Andrews, Nick J.
Thomas, Sara L.
author_facet Leite, Andreia
Andrews, Nick J.
Thomas, Sara L.
author_sort Leite, Andreia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pre‐licensure studies have limited ability to detect rare adverse events (AEs) to vaccines, requiring timely post‐licensure studies. With the increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using these data has emerged as an option. We reviewed methods currently used to inform development of similar systems for countries considering their introduction. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched, with additional searches of conference abstract books. Questionnaires were sent to organizations worldwide to ascertain unpublished studies. Eligible studies used EHR and regularly assessed pre‐specified AE to vaccine(s). Key features of studies were compared descriptively. RESULTS: From 2779 studies, 31 were included from the USA (23), UK (6), and Taiwan and New Zealand (1 each). These were published/conducted between May 2005 and April 2015. Thirty‐eight different vaccines were studied, focusing mainly on influenza (47.4%), especially 2009 H1N1 vaccines. Forty‐six analytic approaches were used, reflecting frequency of EHR updates and the AE studied. Poisson‐based maximized sequential probability ratio test was the most common (43.5%), followed by its binomial (23.9%) and conditional versions (10.9%). Thirty‐seven of 49 analyses (75.5%) mentioned control for confounding, using an adjusted expected rate (51.4% of those adjusting), stratification (16.2%) or a combination of a self‐controlled design and stratification (13.5%). Guillain‐Barré syndrome (11.9%), meningitis/encephalitis/myelitis (11.9%) and seizures (10.8%) were studied most often. CONCLUSIONS: Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using EHR has developed over the past decade but is not yet widely used. As more countries have access to EHR, it will be important that appropriate methods are selected, considering the data available and AE of interest. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5021108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50211082016-09-23 Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods Leite, Andreia Andrews, Nick J. Thomas, Sara L. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Reviews PURPOSE: Pre‐licensure studies have limited ability to detect rare adverse events (AEs) to vaccines, requiring timely post‐licensure studies. With the increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using these data has emerged as an option. We reviewed methods currently used to inform development of similar systems for countries considering their introduction. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched, with additional searches of conference abstract books. Questionnaires were sent to organizations worldwide to ascertain unpublished studies. Eligible studies used EHR and regularly assessed pre‐specified AE to vaccine(s). Key features of studies were compared descriptively. RESULTS: From 2779 studies, 31 were included from the USA (23), UK (6), and Taiwan and New Zealand (1 each). These were published/conducted between May 2005 and April 2015. Thirty‐eight different vaccines were studied, focusing mainly on influenza (47.4%), especially 2009 H1N1 vaccines. Forty‐six analytic approaches were used, reflecting frequency of EHR updates and the AE studied. Poisson‐based maximized sequential probability ratio test was the most common (43.5%), followed by its binomial (23.9%) and conditional versions (10.9%). Thirty‐seven of 49 analyses (75.5%) mentioned control for confounding, using an adjusted expected rate (51.4% of those adjusting), stratification (16.2%) or a combination of a self‐controlled design and stratification (13.5%). Guillain‐Barré syndrome (11.9%), meningitis/encephalitis/myelitis (11.9%) and seizures (10.8%) were studied most often. CONCLUSIONS: Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using EHR has developed over the past decade but is not yet widely used. As more countries have access to EHR, it will be important that appropriate methods are selected, considering the data available and AE of interest. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-28 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5021108/ /pubmed/26817940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3966 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Leite, Andreia
Andrews, Nick J.
Thomas, Sara L.
Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title_full Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title_fullStr Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title_full_unstemmed Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title_short Near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
title_sort near real‐time vaccine safety surveillance using electronic health records—a systematic review of the application of statistical methods
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3966
work_keys_str_mv AT leiteandreia nearrealtimevaccinesafetysurveillanceusingelectronichealthrecordsasystematicreviewoftheapplicationofstatisticalmethods
AT andrewsnickj nearrealtimevaccinesafetysurveillanceusingelectronichealthrecordsasystematicreviewoftheapplicationofstatisticalmethods
AT thomassaral nearrealtimevaccinesafetysurveillanceusingelectronichealthrecordsasystematicreviewoftheapplicationofstatisticalmethods