Cargando…

Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression

AIM: The goal of this study was to identify progressing periodontal sites by applying linear mixed models (LMM) to longitudinal measurements of clinical attachment loss (CAL). METHODS: Ninety‐three periodontally healthy and 236 periodontitis subjects had their CAL measured bi‐monthly for 12 months....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teles, Ricardo, Benecha, Habtamu K., Preisser, John S., Moss, Kevin, Starr, Jacqueline R., Corby, Patricia, Genco, Robert, Garcia, Nathalia, Giannobile, William V., Jared, Heather, Torresyap, Gay, Salazar, Elida, Moya, Julie, Howard, Cynthia, Schifferle, Robert, Falkner, Karen L., Gillespie, Jane, Dixon, Debra, Cugini, MaryAnn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26935472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12539
_version_ 1782453302919692288
author Teles, Ricardo
Benecha, Habtamu K.
Preisser, John S.
Moss, Kevin
Starr, Jacqueline R.
Corby, Patricia
Genco, Robert
Garcia, Nathalia
Giannobile, William V.
Jared, Heather
Torresyap, Gay
Salazar, Elida
Moya, Julie
Howard, Cynthia
Schifferle, Robert
Falkner, Karen L.
Gillespie, Jane
Dixon, Debra
Cugini, MaryAnn
author_facet Teles, Ricardo
Benecha, Habtamu K.
Preisser, John S.
Moss, Kevin
Starr, Jacqueline R.
Corby, Patricia
Genco, Robert
Garcia, Nathalia
Giannobile, William V.
Jared, Heather
Torresyap, Gay
Salazar, Elida
Moya, Julie
Howard, Cynthia
Schifferle, Robert
Falkner, Karen L.
Gillespie, Jane
Dixon, Debra
Cugini, MaryAnn
author_sort Teles, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description AIM: The goal of this study was to identify progressing periodontal sites by applying linear mixed models (LMM) to longitudinal measurements of clinical attachment loss (CAL). METHODS: Ninety‐three periodontally healthy and 236 periodontitis subjects had their CAL measured bi‐monthly for 12 months. The proportions of sites demonstrating increases in CAL from baseline above specified thresholds were calculated for each visit. The proportions of sites reversing from the progressing state were also computed. LMM were fitted for each tooth site and the predicted CAL levels used to categorize sites regarding progression or regression. The threshold for progression was established based on the model‐estimated error in predictions. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 21.2%, 2.8% and 0.3% of sites progressed, according to thresholds of 1, 2 and 3 mm of CAL increase. However, on average, 42.0%, 64.4% and 77.7% of progressing sites for the different thresholds reversed in subsequent visits. Conversely, 97.1%, 76.9% and 23.1% of sites classified as progressing using LMM had observed CAL increases above 1, 2 and 3 mm after 12 months, whereas mean rates of reversal were 10.6%, 30.2% and 53.0% respectively. CONCLUSION: LMM accounted for several sources of error in longitudinal CAL measurement, providing an improved method for classifying progressing sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5021116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50211162016-09-23 Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression Teles, Ricardo Benecha, Habtamu K. Preisser, John S. Moss, Kevin Starr, Jacqueline R. Corby, Patricia Genco, Robert Garcia, Nathalia Giannobile, William V. Jared, Heather Torresyap, Gay Salazar, Elida Moya, Julie Howard, Cynthia Schifferle, Robert Falkner, Karen L. Gillespie, Jane Dixon, Debra Cugini, MaryAnn J Clin Periodontol Periodontal Diseases AIM: The goal of this study was to identify progressing periodontal sites by applying linear mixed models (LMM) to longitudinal measurements of clinical attachment loss (CAL). METHODS: Ninety‐three periodontally healthy and 236 periodontitis subjects had their CAL measured bi‐monthly for 12 months. The proportions of sites demonstrating increases in CAL from baseline above specified thresholds were calculated for each visit. The proportions of sites reversing from the progressing state were also computed. LMM were fitted for each tooth site and the predicted CAL levels used to categorize sites regarding progression or regression. The threshold for progression was established based on the model‐estimated error in predictions. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 21.2%, 2.8% and 0.3% of sites progressed, according to thresholds of 1, 2 and 3 mm of CAL increase. However, on average, 42.0%, 64.4% and 77.7% of progressing sites for the different thresholds reversed in subsequent visits. Conversely, 97.1%, 76.9% and 23.1% of sites classified as progressing using LMM had observed CAL increases above 1, 2 and 3 mm after 12 months, whereas mean rates of reversal were 10.6%, 30.2% and 53.0% respectively. CONCLUSION: LMM accounted for several sources of error in longitudinal CAL measurement, providing an improved method for classifying progressing sites. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-06 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5021116/ /pubmed/26935472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12539 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Periodontal Diseases
Teles, Ricardo
Benecha, Habtamu K.
Preisser, John S.
Moss, Kevin
Starr, Jacqueline R.
Corby, Patricia
Genco, Robert
Garcia, Nathalia
Giannobile, William V.
Jared, Heather
Torresyap, Gay
Salazar, Elida
Moya, Julie
Howard, Cynthia
Schifferle, Robert
Falkner, Karen L.
Gillespie, Jane
Dixon, Debra
Cugini, MaryAnn
Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title_full Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title_fullStr Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title_full_unstemmed Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title_short Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
title_sort modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression
topic Periodontal Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26935472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12539
work_keys_str_mv AT telesricardo modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT benechahabtamuk modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT preisserjohns modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT mosskevin modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT starrjacqueliner modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT corbypatricia modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT gencorobert modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT garcianathalia modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT giannobilewilliamv modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT jaredheather modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT torresyapgay modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT salazarelida modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT moyajulie modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT howardcynthia modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT schifferlerobert modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT falknerkarenl modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT gillespiejane modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT dixondebra modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression
AT cuginimaryann modellingchangesinclinicalattachmentlosstoclassifyperiodontaldiseaseprogression