Cargando…

What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews

BACKGROUND: Sedation is increasingly used to facilitate procedures on children in emergency departments (EDs). This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) examines the safety and efficacy of sedative agents commonly used for procedural sedation in children in the ED or similar settings. METHODS: We fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartling, Lisa, Milne, Andrea, Foisy, Michelle, Lang, Eddy S., Sinclair, Douglas, Klassen, Terry P., Evered, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12938
_version_ 1782453311741362176
author Hartling, Lisa
Milne, Andrea
Foisy, Michelle
Lang, Eddy S.
Sinclair, Douglas
Klassen, Terry P.
Evered, Lisa
author_facet Hartling, Lisa
Milne, Andrea
Foisy, Michelle
Lang, Eddy S.
Sinclair, Douglas
Klassen, Terry P.
Evered, Lisa
author_sort Hartling, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedation is increasingly used to facilitate procedures on children in emergency departments (EDs). This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) examines the safety and efficacy of sedative agents commonly used for procedural sedation in children in the ED or similar settings. METHODS: We followed standard SR methods: comprehensive search; dual study selection, quality assessment, data extraction. We included SRs of children (1 month to 18 years) where the indication for sedation was procedure‐related and performed in the ED. RESULTS: Fourteen SRs were included (210 primary studies). The most data were available for propofol (six reviews/50,472 sedations) followed by ketamine (7/8,238), nitrous oxide (5/8,220), and midazolam (4/4,978). Inconsistent conclusions for propofol were reported across six reviews. Half concluded that propofol was sufficiently safe; three reviews noted a higher occurrence of adverse events, particularly respiratory depression (upper estimate 1.1%; 5.4% for hypotension requiring intervention). Efficacy of propofol was considered in four reviews and found adequate in three. Five reviews found ketamine to be efficacious and seven reviews showed it to be safe. All five reviews of nitrous oxide concluded it is safe (0.1% incidence of respiratory events); most found it effective in cooperative children. Four reviews of midazolam made varying recommendations. To be effective, midazolam should be combined with another agent that increases the risk of adverse events (upper estimate 9.1% for desaturation, 0.1% for hypotension requiring intervention). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive examination of an extensive body of literature shows consistent safety and efficacy for nitrous oxide and ketamine, with very rare significant adverse events for propofol. There was considerable heterogeneity in outcomes and reporting across studies and previous reviews. Standardized outcome sets and reporting should be encouraged to facilitate evidence‐based recommendations for care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5021163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50211632016-09-23 What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews Hartling, Lisa Milne, Andrea Foisy, Michelle Lang, Eddy S. Sinclair, Douglas Klassen, Terry P. Evered, Lisa Acad Emerg Med Progressive Clinical Practices BACKGROUND: Sedation is increasingly used to facilitate procedures on children in emergency departments (EDs). This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) examines the safety and efficacy of sedative agents commonly used for procedural sedation in children in the ED or similar settings. METHODS: We followed standard SR methods: comprehensive search; dual study selection, quality assessment, data extraction. We included SRs of children (1 month to 18 years) where the indication for sedation was procedure‐related and performed in the ED. RESULTS: Fourteen SRs were included (210 primary studies). The most data were available for propofol (six reviews/50,472 sedations) followed by ketamine (7/8,238), nitrous oxide (5/8,220), and midazolam (4/4,978). Inconsistent conclusions for propofol were reported across six reviews. Half concluded that propofol was sufficiently safe; three reviews noted a higher occurrence of adverse events, particularly respiratory depression (upper estimate 1.1%; 5.4% for hypotension requiring intervention). Efficacy of propofol was considered in four reviews and found adequate in three. Five reviews found ketamine to be efficacious and seven reviews showed it to be safe. All five reviews of nitrous oxide concluded it is safe (0.1% incidence of respiratory events); most found it effective in cooperative children. Four reviews of midazolam made varying recommendations. To be effective, midazolam should be combined with another agent that increases the risk of adverse events (upper estimate 9.1% for desaturation, 0.1% for hypotension requiring intervention). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive examination of an extensive body of literature shows consistent safety and efficacy for nitrous oxide and ketamine, with very rare significant adverse events for propofol. There was considerable heterogeneity in outcomes and reporting across studies and previous reviews. Standardized outcome sets and reporting should be encouraged to facilitate evidence‐based recommendations for care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-24 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5021163/ /pubmed/26858095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12938 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Progressive Clinical Practices
Hartling, Lisa
Milne, Andrea
Foisy, Michelle
Lang, Eddy S.
Sinclair, Douglas
Klassen, Terry P.
Evered, Lisa
What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title_full What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title_fullStr What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title_full_unstemmed What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title_short What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews
title_sort what works and what's safe in pediatric emergency procedural sedation: an overview of reviews
topic Progressive Clinical Practices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12938
work_keys_str_mv AT hartlinglisa whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT milneandrea whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT foisymichelle whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT langeddys whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT sinclairdouglas whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT klassenterryp whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews
AT everedlisa whatworksandwhatssafeinpediatricemergencyproceduralsedationanoverviewofreviews