Cargando…
What are we to think when results from mouse research contradict those from human experiments and clinical practice?
Autores principales: | Schofield, G, Henderson, G, Crofts, C, Thornley, S |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2016.31 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mechanochemical Organocatalysis: Do High Enantioselectivities Contradict What We Might Expect?
por: Williams, Matthew T. J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Urinary Gluten Peptide Determination: Results Are Results, Even When They Contradict Aprioristic Expectations
por: Monachesi, Chiara, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics
por: Byers, William
Publicado: (2007) -
What We Think About When We Think About Triffids: The Monstrous Vegetal in Post-war British Science Fiction
por: Matthews, Graham J.
Publicado: (2016) -
When suffering contradicts belief: measuring theodical struggling
por: Park, Crystal L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)