Cargando…
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Financial incentives and audit plus feedback on performance are two strategies commonly used by governments to motivate general practitioners (GP) to undertake specific healthcare activities. However, in recent years, governments have reduced or removed incentive payments without evidenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0 |
_version_ | 1782453476498866176 |
---|---|
author | Hocking, Jane S. Temple-Smith, Meredith van Driel, Mieke Law, Matthew Guy, Rebecca Bulfone, Liliana Wood, Anna Low, Nicola Donovan, Basil Fairley, Christopher K. Kaldor, John Gunn, Jane |
author_facet | Hocking, Jane S. Temple-Smith, Meredith van Driel, Mieke Law, Matthew Guy, Rebecca Bulfone, Liliana Wood, Anna Low, Nicola Donovan, Basil Fairley, Christopher K. Kaldor, John Gunn, Jane |
author_sort | Hocking, Jane S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Financial incentives and audit plus feedback on performance are two strategies commonly used by governments to motivate general practitioners (GP) to undertake specific healthcare activities. However, in recent years, governments have reduced or removed incentive payments without evidence of the potential impact on GP behaviour and patient outcomes. This trial (known as ACCEPt-able) aims to determine whether preventive care activities in general practice are sustained when financial incentives and/or external audit plus feedback on preventive care activities are removed. The activity investigated is annual chlamydia testing for 16- to 29-year-old adults, a key preventive health strategy within this age group. METHODS/DESIGN: ACCEPt-able builds on a large cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a 3-year chlamydia testing intervention in general practice. GPs were provided with a support package to facilitate annual chlamydia testing of all sexually active 16- to 29-year-old patients. This package included financial incentive payments to the GP for each chlamydia test conducted and external audit plus feedback on each GP’s chlamydia testing rates. ACCEPt-able is a factorial cluster RCT in which general practices are randomised to one of four groups: (i) removal of audit plus feedback—continue to receive financial incentive payments for each chlamydia test; (ii) removal of financial incentive payments—continue to receive audit plus feedback; (iii) removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback; and (iv) continue financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback. The primary outcome is chlamydia testing rate measured as the proportion of sexually active 16- to 29-year-olds who have a GP consultation within a 12-month period and at least one chlamydia test. DISCUSSION: This will be the first RCT to examine the impact of removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback on the chlamydia testing behaviour of GPs. This trial is particularly timely and will increase our understanding about the impact of financial incentives and audit plus feedback on GP behaviour when governments are looking for opportunities to control healthcare budgets and maximise clinical outcomes for money spent. The results of this trial will have implications for supporting preventive health measures beyond the content area of chlamydia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000595617). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5022200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50222002016-09-20 Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol Hocking, Jane S. Temple-Smith, Meredith van Driel, Mieke Law, Matthew Guy, Rebecca Bulfone, Liliana Wood, Anna Low, Nicola Donovan, Basil Fairley, Christopher K. Kaldor, John Gunn, Jane Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Financial incentives and audit plus feedback on performance are two strategies commonly used by governments to motivate general practitioners (GP) to undertake specific healthcare activities. However, in recent years, governments have reduced or removed incentive payments without evidence of the potential impact on GP behaviour and patient outcomes. This trial (known as ACCEPt-able) aims to determine whether preventive care activities in general practice are sustained when financial incentives and/or external audit plus feedback on preventive care activities are removed. The activity investigated is annual chlamydia testing for 16- to 29-year-old adults, a key preventive health strategy within this age group. METHODS/DESIGN: ACCEPt-able builds on a large cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a 3-year chlamydia testing intervention in general practice. GPs were provided with a support package to facilitate annual chlamydia testing of all sexually active 16- to 29-year-old patients. This package included financial incentive payments to the GP for each chlamydia test conducted and external audit plus feedback on each GP’s chlamydia testing rates. ACCEPt-able is a factorial cluster RCT in which general practices are randomised to one of four groups: (i) removal of audit plus feedback—continue to receive financial incentive payments for each chlamydia test; (ii) removal of financial incentive payments—continue to receive audit plus feedback; (iii) removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback; and (iv) continue financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback. The primary outcome is chlamydia testing rate measured as the proportion of sexually active 16- to 29-year-olds who have a GP consultation within a 12-month period and at least one chlamydia test. DISCUSSION: This will be the first RCT to examine the impact of removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback on the chlamydia testing behaviour of GPs. This trial is particularly timely and will increase our understanding about the impact of financial incentives and audit plus feedback on GP behaviour when governments are looking for opportunities to control healthcare budgets and maximise clinical outcomes for money spent. The results of this trial will have implications for supporting preventive health measures beyond the content area of chlamydia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000595617). BioMed Central 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5022200/ /pubmed/27624835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hocking, Jane S. Temple-Smith, Meredith van Driel, Mieke Law, Matthew Guy, Rebecca Bulfone, Liliana Wood, Anna Low, Nicola Donovan, Basil Fairley, Christopher K. Kaldor, John Gunn, Jane Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title | Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full | Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_short | Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_sort | can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? accept-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hockingjanes canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT templesmithmeredith canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT vandrielmieke canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT lawmatthew canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT guyrebecca canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT bulfoneliliana canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT woodanna canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT lownicola canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT donovanbasil canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT fairleychristopherk canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT kaldorjohn canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT gunnjane canpreventivecareactivitiesingeneralpracticebesustainedwhenfinancialincentivesandexternalauditplusfeedbackareremovedacceptableaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol |