Cargando…

Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods

BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data allows absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow and can potentially improve the diagnosis and prognostication of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), against the current clinical standard of vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papanastasiou, Giorgos, Williams, Michelle C., Dweck, Marc R., Alam, Shirjel, Cooper, Annette, Mirsadraee, Saeed, Newby, David E., Semple, Scott I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0270-1
_version_ 1782453478327582720
author Papanastasiou, Giorgos
Williams, Michelle C.
Dweck, Marc R.
Alam, Shirjel
Cooper, Annette
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Newby, David E.
Semple, Scott I.
author_facet Papanastasiou, Giorgos
Williams, Michelle C.
Dweck, Marc R.
Alam, Shirjel
Cooper, Annette
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Newby, David E.
Semple, Scott I.
author_sort Papanastasiou, Giorgos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data allows absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow and can potentially improve the diagnosis and prognostication of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), against the current clinical standard of visual assessments. This study compares the diagnostic performance of distributed parameter modeling (DP) against the standard Fermi model, for the detection of obstructive CAD, in per vessel against per patient analysis. METHODS: A pilot cohort of 28 subjects (24 included in the final analysis) with known or suspected CAD underwent adenosine stress-rest perfusion CMR at 3T. Data were analysed using Fermi and DP modeling against invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve, acquired in all subjects. Obstructive CAD was defined as luminal stenosis of ≥70 % alone, or luminal stenosis ≥50 % and fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. RESULTS: On ROC analysis, DP modeling outperformed the standard Fermi model, in per vessel and per patient analysis. In per patient analysis, DP modeling-derived myocardial blood flow at stress demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity (0.96, 0.92) in detecting obstructive CAD, against Fermi modeling (0.78, 0.88) and visual assessments (0.79, 0.88), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DP modeling demonstrated consistently increased diagnostic performance against Fermi modeling and showed that it may have merit for stratifying patients with at least one vessel with obstructive CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01368237 Registered 6 of June 2011. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01368237 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0270-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5022209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50222092016-09-20 Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods Papanastasiou, Giorgos Williams, Michelle C. Dweck, Marc R. Alam, Shirjel Cooper, Annette Mirsadraee, Saeed Newby, David E. Semple, Scott I. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data allows absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow and can potentially improve the diagnosis and prognostication of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), against the current clinical standard of visual assessments. This study compares the diagnostic performance of distributed parameter modeling (DP) against the standard Fermi model, for the detection of obstructive CAD, in per vessel against per patient analysis. METHODS: A pilot cohort of 28 subjects (24 included in the final analysis) with known or suspected CAD underwent adenosine stress-rest perfusion CMR at 3T. Data were analysed using Fermi and DP modeling against invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve, acquired in all subjects. Obstructive CAD was defined as luminal stenosis of ≥70 % alone, or luminal stenosis ≥50 % and fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. RESULTS: On ROC analysis, DP modeling outperformed the standard Fermi model, in per vessel and per patient analysis. In per patient analysis, DP modeling-derived myocardial blood flow at stress demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity (0.96, 0.92) in detecting obstructive CAD, against Fermi modeling (0.78, 0.88) and visual assessments (0.79, 0.88), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DP modeling demonstrated consistently increased diagnostic performance against Fermi modeling and showed that it may have merit for stratifying patients with at least one vessel with obstructive CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01368237 Registered 6 of June 2011. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01368237 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0270-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5022209/ /pubmed/27624746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0270-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Papanastasiou, Giorgos
Williams, Michelle C.
Dweck, Marc R.
Alam, Shirjel
Cooper, Annette
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Newby, David E.
Semple, Scott I.
Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title_full Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title_short Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
title_sort quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0270-1
work_keys_str_mv AT papanastasiougiorgos quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT williamsmichellec quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT dweckmarcr quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT alamshirjel quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT cooperannette quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT mirsadraeesaeed quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT newbydavide quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods
AT semplescotti quantitativeassessmentofmyocardialbloodflowincoronaryarterydiseasebycardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparisonoffermianddistributedparametermodelingagainstinvasivemethods