Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Satisfactory composite restoration depends upon its smooth finish, quality of polishing agents, type of composite material used, and its composition. The present study evaluated the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resin. MATERIALS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652251 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.189761 |
_version_ | 1782453514150084608 |
---|---|
author | Chour, Rashmi G. Moda, Aman Arora, Arpana Arafath, Muhmmed Y. Shetty, Vikram K. Rishal, Yousef |
author_facet | Chour, Rashmi G. Moda, Aman Arora, Arpana Arafath, Muhmmed Y. Shetty, Vikram K. Rishal, Yousef |
author_sort | Chour, Rashmi G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Satisfactory composite restoration depends upon its smooth finish, quality of polishing agents, type of composite material used, and its composition. The present study evaluated the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty discs of composite were prepared and equally subjected to different finishing and polishing procedures; (i) unpolished control group, (ii) sof-lex discs, (iii) diamond tips, and (iv) Astrobrush groups. Later, the surface roughness for the entire specimen was evaluated using Profilomotor. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test at significance level of 0.001. RESULTS: Composite surface roughness after polishing was statistically significant between the groups. Sof-lex group produced lesser surface roughness compared to control, Astrobrush, and diamond group. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that diamond tips can be used to remove rough surface whereas sof-lex can be used for final finish and polish of the composite restoration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5022396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50223962016-09-20 Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study Chour, Rashmi G. Moda, Aman Arora, Arpana Arafath, Muhmmed Y. Shetty, Vikram K. Rishal, Yousef J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Satisfactory composite restoration depends upon its smooth finish, quality of polishing agents, type of composite material used, and its composition. The present study evaluated the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty discs of composite were prepared and equally subjected to different finishing and polishing procedures; (i) unpolished control group, (ii) sof-lex discs, (iii) diamond tips, and (iv) Astrobrush groups. Later, the surface roughness for the entire specimen was evaluated using Profilomotor. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test at significance level of 0.001. RESULTS: Composite surface roughness after polishing was statistically significant between the groups. Sof-lex group produced lesser surface roughness compared to control, Astrobrush, and diamond group. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that diamond tips can be used to remove rough surface whereas sof-lex can be used for final finish and polish of the composite restoration. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5022396/ /pubmed/27652251 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.189761 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chour, Rashmi G. Moda, Aman Arora, Arpana Arafath, Muhmmed Y. Shetty, Vikram K. Rishal, Yousef Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652251 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.189761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chourrashmig comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT modaaman comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT aroraarpana comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT arafathmuhmmedy comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT shettyvikramk comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT rishalyousef comparativeevaluationofeffectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofcompositeresinaninvitrostudy |