Cargando…
Current status of mini-gastric bypass
Mini-gastric bypass (MGP) is a promising bariatric procedure. Tens of thousands of this procedure have been performed throughout the world since Rutledge performed the first procedure in the United States of America in 1997. Several thousands of these have even been documented in the published scien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181352 |
_version_ | 1782453532769648640 |
---|---|
author | Mahawar, Kamal K. Kumar, Parveen Carr, William RJ Jennings, Neil Schroeder, Norbert Balupuri, Shlok Small, Peter K. |
author_facet | Mahawar, Kamal K. Kumar, Parveen Carr, William RJ Jennings, Neil Schroeder, Norbert Balupuri, Shlok Small, Peter K. |
author_sort | Mahawar, Kamal K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mini-gastric bypass (MGP) is a promising bariatric procedure. Tens of thousands of this procedure have been performed throughout the world since Rutledge performed the first procedure in the United States of America in 1997. Several thousands of these have even been documented in the published scientific literature. Despite a proven track record over nearly two decades, this operation continues to polarise the bariatric community. A large number of surgeons across the world have strong objections to this procedure and do not perform it. The risk of symptomatic (bile) reflux, marginal ulceration, severe malnutrition, and long-term risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers are some of the commonly voiced concerns. Despite these expressed fears, several advantages such as technical simplicity, shorter learning curve, ease of revision and reversal, non-inferior weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes have prompted some surgeons to advocate a wider adoption of this procedure. This review examines the current status of these controversial aspects in the light of the published academic literature in English. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5022508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50225082016-10-01 Current status of mini-gastric bypass Mahawar, Kamal K. Kumar, Parveen Carr, William RJ Jennings, Neil Schroeder, Norbert Balupuri, Shlok Small, Peter K. J Minim Access Surg Review Article Mini-gastric bypass (MGP) is a promising bariatric procedure. Tens of thousands of this procedure have been performed throughout the world since Rutledge performed the first procedure in the United States of America in 1997. Several thousands of these have even been documented in the published scientific literature. Despite a proven track record over nearly two decades, this operation continues to polarise the bariatric community. A large number of surgeons across the world have strong objections to this procedure and do not perform it. The risk of symptomatic (bile) reflux, marginal ulceration, severe malnutrition, and long-term risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers are some of the commonly voiced concerns. Despite these expressed fears, several advantages such as technical simplicity, shorter learning curve, ease of revision and reversal, non-inferior weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes have prompted some surgeons to advocate a wider adoption of this procedure. This review examines the current status of these controversial aspects in the light of the published academic literature in English. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5022508/ /pubmed/27251826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181352 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mahawar, Kamal K. Kumar, Parveen Carr, William RJ Jennings, Neil Schroeder, Norbert Balupuri, Shlok Small, Peter K. Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title | Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title_full | Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title_fullStr | Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title_short | Current status of mini-gastric bypass |
title_sort | current status of mini-gastric bypass |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahawarkamalk currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT kumarparveen currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT carrwilliamrj currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT jenningsneil currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT schroedernorbert currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT balupurishlok currentstatusofminigastricbypass AT smallpeterk currentstatusofminigastricbypass |