Cargando…

Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger

In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephens, Neil, Ruivenkamp, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836
_version_ 1782453563930181632
author Stephens, Neil
Ruivenkamp, Martin
author_facet Stephens, Neil
Ruivenkamp, Martin
author_sort Stephens, Neil
collection PubMed
description In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and were circulated across the Internet. These images—literally marks on a two-dimensional surface—do important work in establishing what IVM is and what it can do. A combination of visual semiotics and narrative analysis shows that images of IVM afford readings of their story that are co-created by the viewer. Before the cultured burger, during 2011, images of IVM fell into four distinct categories: cell images, tissue images, flowcharts, and meat in a dish images. The narrative infrastructure of each image type affords different interpretations of what IVM can accomplish and what it is. The 2013 cultured burger images both draw upon and depart from these image types in an attempt to present IVM as a normal food stuff, and as ‘matter in place’ when placed on the plate. The analysis of individual images and the collection of images about a certain object or subject—known as the imagescape—is a productive approach to understanding the ontology and promise of IVM and is applicable to other areas of social life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5022697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50226972016-09-29 Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger Stephens, Neil Ruivenkamp, Martin Sci Cult (Lond) Original Articles In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and were circulated across the Internet. These images—literally marks on a two-dimensional surface—do important work in establishing what IVM is and what it can do. A combination of visual semiotics and narrative analysis shows that images of IVM afford readings of their story that are co-created by the viewer. Before the cultured burger, during 2011, images of IVM fell into four distinct categories: cell images, tissue images, flowcharts, and meat in a dish images. The narrative infrastructure of each image type affords different interpretations of what IVM can accomplish and what it is. The 2013 cultured burger images both draw upon and depart from these image types in an attempt to present IVM as a normal food stuff, and as ‘matter in place’ when placed on the plate. The analysis of individual images and the collection of images about a certain object or subject—known as the imagescape—is a productive approach to understanding the ontology and promise of IVM and is applicable to other areas of social life. Routledge 2016-07-02 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5022697/ /pubmed/27695202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stephens, Neil
Ruivenkamp, Martin
Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title_full Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title_fullStr Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title_full_unstemmed Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title_short Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
title_sort promise and ontological ambiguity in the in vitro meat imagescape: from laboratory myotubes to the cultured burger
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836
work_keys_str_mv AT stephensneil promiseandontologicalambiguityintheinvitromeatimagescapefromlaboratorymyotubestotheculturedburger
AT ruivenkampmartin promiseandontologicalambiguityintheinvitromeatimagescapefromlaboratorymyotubestotheculturedburger