Cargando…
Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger
In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and we...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836 |
_version_ | 1782453563930181632 |
---|---|
author | Stephens, Neil Ruivenkamp, Martin |
author_facet | Stephens, Neil Ruivenkamp, Martin |
author_sort | Stephens, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and were circulated across the Internet. These images—literally marks on a two-dimensional surface—do important work in establishing what IVM is and what it can do. A combination of visual semiotics and narrative analysis shows that images of IVM afford readings of their story that are co-created by the viewer. Before the cultured burger, during 2011, images of IVM fell into four distinct categories: cell images, tissue images, flowcharts, and meat in a dish images. The narrative infrastructure of each image type affords different interpretations of what IVM can accomplish and what it is. The 2013 cultured burger images both draw upon and depart from these image types in an attempt to present IVM as a normal food stuff, and as ‘matter in place’ when placed on the plate. The analysis of individual images and the collection of images about a certain object or subject—known as the imagescape—is a productive approach to understanding the ontology and promise of IVM and is applicable to other areas of social life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5022697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50226972016-09-29 Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger Stephens, Neil Ruivenkamp, Martin Sci Cult (Lond) Original Articles In vitro meat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and were circulated across the Internet. These images—literally marks on a two-dimensional surface—do important work in establishing what IVM is and what it can do. A combination of visual semiotics and narrative analysis shows that images of IVM afford readings of their story that are co-created by the viewer. Before the cultured burger, during 2011, images of IVM fell into four distinct categories: cell images, tissue images, flowcharts, and meat in a dish images. The narrative infrastructure of each image type affords different interpretations of what IVM can accomplish and what it is. The 2013 cultured burger images both draw upon and depart from these image types in an attempt to present IVM as a normal food stuff, and as ‘matter in place’ when placed on the plate. The analysis of individual images and the collection of images about a certain object or subject—known as the imagescape—is a productive approach to understanding the ontology and promise of IVM and is applicable to other areas of social life. Routledge 2016-07-02 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5022697/ /pubmed/27695202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Stephens, Neil Ruivenkamp, Martin Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title | Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title_full | Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title_fullStr | Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title_full_unstemmed | Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title_short | Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger |
title_sort | promise and ontological ambiguity in the in vitro meat imagescape: from laboratory myotubes to the cultured burger |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephensneil promiseandontologicalambiguityintheinvitromeatimagescapefromlaboratorymyotubestotheculturedburger AT ruivenkampmartin promiseandontologicalambiguityintheinvitromeatimagescapefromlaboratorymyotubestotheculturedburger |