Cargando…

Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial

PURPOSE: Volatile anesthetics possess cardioprotective properties, but it is unknown if the cardioprotective effects extend equally to all members of the class. Although sevoflurane is a relatively newer anesthetic than isoflurane, its introduction into practice was not preceded by a head-to-head co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Philip M., Bainbridge, Daniel, Chu, Michael W. A., Fernandes, Philip S., Fox, Stephanie A., Iglesias, Ivan, Kiaii, Bob, Lavi, Ronit, Murkin, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0706-y
_version_ 1782453680034807808
author Jones, Philip M.
Bainbridge, Daniel
Chu, Michael W. A.
Fernandes, Philip S.
Fox, Stephanie A.
Iglesias, Ivan
Kiaii, Bob
Lavi, Ronit
Murkin, John M.
author_facet Jones, Philip M.
Bainbridge, Daniel
Chu, Michael W. A.
Fernandes, Philip S.
Fox, Stephanie A.
Iglesias, Ivan
Kiaii, Bob
Lavi, Ronit
Murkin, John M.
author_sort Jones, Philip M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Volatile anesthetics possess cardioprotective properties, but it is unknown if the cardioprotective effects extend equally to all members of the class. Although sevoflurane is a relatively newer anesthetic than isoflurane, its introduction into practice was not preceded by a head-to-head comparison with isoflurane in a trial focusing on clinically important outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether sevoflurane was non-inferior to isoflurane on a clinically important primary outcome in a heterogeneous group of adults undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness clinical trial in 464 adults having coronary artery bypass graft and/or single valve surgery during November 2011 to March 2014. The intervention was maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane (n = 231) or isoflurane (n = 233) administered at a dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC throughout the entire operation. All caregivers were blinded except for the anesthesiologist and perfusionist. The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥ 48 hr and all-cause 30-day mortality. We hypothesized that sevoflurane would be non-inferior to isoflurane (non-inferiority margin < 10% based on an expected event rate of 25%). Secondary outcomes included prolonged ICU stay, 30- and 365-day all-cause mortality, inotrope or vasopressor usage, new-onset hemodialysis or atrial fibrillation, stroke, and readmission to the ICU. RESULTS: No losses to follow-up occurred. The primary outcome occurred in 25% of sevoflurane patients and 30% of isoflurane patients (absolute difference, −5.4%; one-sided 95% confidence interval, 1.4), thus non-inferiority was declared. Sevoflurane was not superior to isoflurane for the primary outcome (P = 0.21) or for any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane is non-inferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and all-cause 30-day mortality. Sevoflurane is not superior to isoflurane on any other of the clinically important outcomes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01477151.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5023754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50237542016-09-27 Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial Jones, Philip M. Bainbridge, Daniel Chu, Michael W. A. Fernandes, Philip S. Fox, Stephanie A. Iglesias, Ivan Kiaii, Bob Lavi, Ronit Murkin, John M. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Volatile anesthetics possess cardioprotective properties, but it is unknown if the cardioprotective effects extend equally to all members of the class. Although sevoflurane is a relatively newer anesthetic than isoflurane, its introduction into practice was not preceded by a head-to-head comparison with isoflurane in a trial focusing on clinically important outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether sevoflurane was non-inferior to isoflurane on a clinically important primary outcome in a heterogeneous group of adults undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness clinical trial in 464 adults having coronary artery bypass graft and/or single valve surgery during November 2011 to March 2014. The intervention was maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane (n = 231) or isoflurane (n = 233) administered at a dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC throughout the entire operation. All caregivers were blinded except for the anesthesiologist and perfusionist. The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥ 48 hr and all-cause 30-day mortality. We hypothesized that sevoflurane would be non-inferior to isoflurane (non-inferiority margin < 10% based on an expected event rate of 25%). Secondary outcomes included prolonged ICU stay, 30- and 365-day all-cause mortality, inotrope or vasopressor usage, new-onset hemodialysis or atrial fibrillation, stroke, and readmission to the ICU. RESULTS: No losses to follow-up occurred. The primary outcome occurred in 25% of sevoflurane patients and 30% of isoflurane patients (absolute difference, −5.4%; one-sided 95% confidence interval, 1.4), thus non-inferiority was declared. Sevoflurane was not superior to isoflurane for the primary outcome (P = 0.21) or for any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane is non-inferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and all-cause 30-day mortality. Sevoflurane is not superior to isoflurane on any other of the clinically important outcomes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01477151. Springer US 2016-07-27 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5023754/ /pubmed/27465213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0706-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Jones, Philip M.
Bainbridge, Daniel
Chu, Michael W. A.
Fernandes, Philip S.
Fox, Stephanie A.
Iglesias, Ivan
Kiaii, Bob
Lavi, Ronit
Murkin, John M.
Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title_full Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title_fullStr Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title_short Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
title_sort comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0706-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesphilipm comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT bainbridgedaniel comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT chumichaelwa comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT fernandesphilips comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT foxstephaniea comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT iglesiasivan comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT kiaiibob comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT lavironit comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial
AT murkinjohnm comparisonofisofluraneandsevofluraneincardiacsurgeryarandomizednoninferioritycomparativeeffectivenesstrial