Cargando…
Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430 |
_version_ | 1782453688777834496 |
---|---|
author | Beal, Eliza W. Tumin, Dmitry Conteh, Lanla F. Hanje, A. James Michaels, Anthony J. Hayes, Don Black, Sylvester M. Mumtaz, Khalid |
author_facet | Beal, Eliza W. Tumin, Dmitry Conteh, Lanla F. Hanje, A. James Michaels, Anthony J. Hayes, Don Black, Sylvester M. Mumtaz, Khalid |
author_sort | Beal, Eliza W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient and graft survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years and overall, liver retransplantation, and length of stay were compared between nonobese recipients receiving a graft from nonobese donors and obese recipient-obese donor, obese recipient-nonobese donor, and nonobese recipient-obese donor pairs. 51,556 LT recipients were identified, including 34,217 (66%) nonobese and 17,339 (34%) obese recipients. The proportions of patients receiving an allograft from an obese donor were 24% and 29%, respectively, among nonobese and obese recipients. Graft loss (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09–1.46; p = 0.002) and mortality (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.16–1.65; p < 0.001) at 30 days were increased in the obese recipient-obese donor pair. However, 1-year graft (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93; p = 0.002) and patient (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95; p = 0.007) survival and overall patient (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1.00; p = 0.042) survival were favorable. There is evidence of recipient and donor obesity disadvantage early, but survival curves demonstrate improved long-term outcomes. It is important to consider obesity in the donor-recipient match. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5023820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50238202016-09-29 Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect Beal, Eliza W. Tumin, Dmitry Conteh, Lanla F. Hanje, A. James Michaels, Anthony J. Hayes, Don Black, Sylvester M. Mumtaz, Khalid J Transplant Research Article There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient and graft survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years and overall, liver retransplantation, and length of stay were compared between nonobese recipients receiving a graft from nonobese donors and obese recipient-obese donor, obese recipient-nonobese donor, and nonobese recipient-obese donor pairs. 51,556 LT recipients were identified, including 34,217 (66%) nonobese and 17,339 (34%) obese recipients. The proportions of patients receiving an allograft from an obese donor were 24% and 29%, respectively, among nonobese and obese recipients. Graft loss (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09–1.46; p = 0.002) and mortality (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.16–1.65; p < 0.001) at 30 days were increased in the obese recipient-obese donor pair. However, 1-year graft (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93; p = 0.002) and patient (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95; p = 0.007) survival and overall patient (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1.00; p = 0.042) survival were favorable. There is evidence of recipient and donor obesity disadvantage early, but survival curves demonstrate improved long-term outcomes. It is important to consider obesity in the donor-recipient match. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5023820/ /pubmed/27688905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430 Text en Copyright © 2016 Eliza W. Beal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beal, Eliza W. Tumin, Dmitry Conteh, Lanla F. Hanje, A. James Michaels, Anthony J. Hayes, Don Black, Sylvester M. Mumtaz, Khalid Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title | Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title_full | Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title_fullStr | Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title_short | Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect |
title_sort | impact of recipient and donor obesity match on the outcomes of liver transplantation: all matches are not perfect |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bealelizaw impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT tumindmitry impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT contehlanlaf impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT hanjeajames impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT michaelsanthonyj impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT hayesdon impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT blacksylvesterm impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect AT mumtazkhalid impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect |