Cargando…

Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect

There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beal, Eliza W., Tumin, Dmitry, Conteh, Lanla F., Hanje, A. James, Michaels, Anthony J., Hayes, Don, Black, Sylvester M., Mumtaz, Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430
_version_ 1782453688777834496
author Beal, Eliza W.
Tumin, Dmitry
Conteh, Lanla F.
Hanje, A. James
Michaels, Anthony J.
Hayes, Don
Black, Sylvester M.
Mumtaz, Khalid
author_facet Beal, Eliza W.
Tumin, Dmitry
Conteh, Lanla F.
Hanje, A. James
Michaels, Anthony J.
Hayes, Don
Black, Sylvester M.
Mumtaz, Khalid
author_sort Beal, Eliza W.
collection PubMed
description There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient and graft survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years and overall, liver retransplantation, and length of stay were compared between nonobese recipients receiving a graft from nonobese donors and obese recipient-obese donor, obese recipient-nonobese donor, and nonobese recipient-obese donor pairs. 51,556 LT recipients were identified, including 34,217 (66%) nonobese and 17,339 (34%) obese recipients. The proportions of patients receiving an allograft from an obese donor were 24% and 29%, respectively, among nonobese and obese recipients. Graft loss (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09–1.46; p = 0.002) and mortality (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.16–1.65; p < 0.001) at 30 days were increased in the obese recipient-obese donor pair. However, 1-year graft (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93; p = 0.002) and patient (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95; p = 0.007) survival and overall patient (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1.00; p = 0.042) survival were favorable. There is evidence of recipient and donor obesity disadvantage early, but survival curves demonstrate improved long-term outcomes. It is important to consider obesity in the donor-recipient match.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5023820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50238202016-09-29 Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect Beal, Eliza W. Tumin, Dmitry Conteh, Lanla F. Hanje, A. James Michaels, Anthony J. Hayes, Don Black, Sylvester M. Mumtaz, Khalid J Transplant Research Article There is a paucity of literature examining recipient-donor obesity matching on liver transplantation outcomes. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for first-time recipients of liver transplant whose age was ≥18 between January 2003 and September 2013. Outcomes including patient and graft survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years and overall, liver retransplantation, and length of stay were compared between nonobese recipients receiving a graft from nonobese donors and obese recipient-obese donor, obese recipient-nonobese donor, and nonobese recipient-obese donor pairs. 51,556 LT recipients were identified, including 34,217 (66%) nonobese and 17,339 (34%) obese recipients. The proportions of patients receiving an allograft from an obese donor were 24% and 29%, respectively, among nonobese and obese recipients. Graft loss (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09–1.46; p = 0.002) and mortality (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.16–1.65; p < 0.001) at 30 days were increased in the obese recipient-obese donor pair. However, 1-year graft (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93; p = 0.002) and patient (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.95; p = 0.007) survival and overall patient (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1.00; p = 0.042) survival were favorable. There is evidence of recipient and donor obesity disadvantage early, but survival curves demonstrate improved long-term outcomes. It is important to consider obesity in the donor-recipient match. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5023820/ /pubmed/27688905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430 Text en Copyright © 2016 Eliza W. Beal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beal, Eliza W.
Tumin, Dmitry
Conteh, Lanla F.
Hanje, A. James
Michaels, Anthony J.
Hayes, Don
Black, Sylvester M.
Mumtaz, Khalid
Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title_full Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title_fullStr Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title_short Impact of Recipient and Donor Obesity Match on the Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: All Matches Are Not Perfect
title_sort impact of recipient and donor obesity match on the outcomes of liver transplantation: all matches are not perfect
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27688905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9709430
work_keys_str_mv AT bealelizaw impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT tumindmitry impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT contehlanlaf impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT hanjeajames impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT michaelsanthonyj impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT hayesdon impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT blacksylvesterm impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect
AT mumtazkhalid impactofrecipientanddonorobesitymatchontheoutcomesoflivertransplantationallmatchesarenotperfect