Cargando…
Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223 |
_version_ | 1782453714310660096 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton, Alison Tétreault, Martine Dyment, David A. Zou, Ruobing Kernohan, Kristin Geraghty, Michael T. Hartley, Taila Boycott, Kym M. |
author_facet | Hamilton, Alison Tétreault, Martine Dyment, David A. Zou, Ruobing Kernohan, Kristin Geraghty, Michael T. Hartley, Taila Boycott, Kym M. |
author_sort | Hamilton, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted as an efficient alternative to clinical Sanger sequencing for diagnosing genetically heterogeneous disorders. Among reports of the clinical and diagnostic utility of WES, few studies to date have directly compared its concordance to Sanger sequencing, which is considered the clinical “gold standard”. We performed a direct comparison of 391 coding and noncoding polymorphisms and variants of unknown significance identified by clinical Sanger sequencing to the WES results of 26 patients. Of the 150 well‐covered coding variants identified by Sanger sequencing, 146 (97.3%) were also reported by WES. Nine genes were excluded from the comparison due to consistently low coverage in WES, which might be attributed to the use of older exome capture kits. We performed confirmatory Sanger sequencing of discordant variants; including five variants with discordant bases and four with discordant zygosity. Confirmatory Sanger sequencing supported the original Sanger report for three of the five discordant bases, one was shown to be a false positive supporting the WES data, and one result differed from both the Sanger and WES data. Two of the discordant zygosity results supported Sanger and the other two supported WES data. We report high concordance for well‐covered coding variants, supporting the use of WES as a screening tool for heterogeneous disorders, and recommend the use of supplementary Sanger sequencing for poorly‐covered genes when the clinical suspicion is high. Importantly, despite remaining difficulties with achieving complete coverage of the whole exome, 10 (38.5%) of the 26 compared patients were diagnosed through WES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5023935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50239352016-09-20 Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care Hamilton, Alison Tétreault, Martine Dyment, David A. Zou, Ruobing Kernohan, Kristin Geraghty, Michael T. Hartley, Taila Boycott, Kym M. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted as an efficient alternative to clinical Sanger sequencing for diagnosing genetically heterogeneous disorders. Among reports of the clinical and diagnostic utility of WES, few studies to date have directly compared its concordance to Sanger sequencing, which is considered the clinical “gold standard”. We performed a direct comparison of 391 coding and noncoding polymorphisms and variants of unknown significance identified by clinical Sanger sequencing to the WES results of 26 patients. Of the 150 well‐covered coding variants identified by Sanger sequencing, 146 (97.3%) were also reported by WES. Nine genes were excluded from the comparison due to consistently low coverage in WES, which might be attributed to the use of older exome capture kits. We performed confirmatory Sanger sequencing of discordant variants; including five variants with discordant bases and four with discordant zygosity. Confirmatory Sanger sequencing supported the original Sanger report for three of the five discordant bases, one was shown to be a false positive supporting the WES data, and one result differed from both the Sanger and WES data. Two of the discordant zygosity results supported Sanger and the other two supported WES data. We report high concordance for well‐covered coding variants, supporting the use of WES as a screening tool for heterogeneous disorders, and recommend the use of supplementary Sanger sequencing for poorly‐covered genes when the clinical suspicion is high. Importantly, despite remaining difficulties with achieving complete coverage of the whole exome, 10 (38.5%) of the 26 compared patients were diagnosed through WES. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5023935/ /pubmed/27652278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hamilton, Alison Tétreault, Martine Dyment, David A. Zou, Ruobing Kernohan, Kristin Geraghty, Michael T. Hartley, Taila Boycott, Kym M. Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title | Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title_full | Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title_fullStr | Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title_full_unstemmed | Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title_short | Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
title_sort | concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical sanger sequencing: implications for patient care |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltonalison concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT tetreaultmartine concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT dymentdavida concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT zouruobing concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT kernohankristin concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT geraghtymichaelt concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT hartleytaila concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare AT boycottkymm concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare |