Cargando…

Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care

The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, Alison, Tétreault, Martine, Dyment, David A., Zou, Ruobing, Kernohan, Kristin, Geraghty, Michael T., Hartley, Taila, Boycott, Kym M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223
_version_ 1782453714310660096
author Hamilton, Alison
Tétreault, Martine
Dyment, David A.
Zou, Ruobing
Kernohan, Kristin
Geraghty, Michael T.
Hartley, Taila
Boycott, Kym M.
author_facet Hamilton, Alison
Tétreault, Martine
Dyment, David A.
Zou, Ruobing
Kernohan, Kristin
Geraghty, Michael T.
Hartley, Taila
Boycott, Kym M.
author_sort Hamilton, Alison
collection PubMed
description The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted as an efficient alternative to clinical Sanger sequencing for diagnosing genetically heterogeneous disorders. Among reports of the clinical and diagnostic utility of WES, few studies to date have directly compared its concordance to Sanger sequencing, which is considered the clinical “gold standard”. We performed a direct comparison of 391 coding and noncoding polymorphisms and variants of unknown significance identified by clinical Sanger sequencing to the WES results of 26 patients. Of the 150 well‐covered coding variants identified by Sanger sequencing, 146 (97.3%) were also reported by WES. Nine genes were excluded from the comparison due to consistently low coverage in WES, which might be attributed to the use of older exome capture kits. We performed confirmatory Sanger sequencing of discordant variants; including five variants with discordant bases and four with discordant zygosity. Confirmatory Sanger sequencing supported the original Sanger report for three of the five discordant bases, one was shown to be a false positive supporting the WES data, and one result differed from both the Sanger and WES data. Two of the discordant zygosity results supported Sanger and the other two supported WES data. We report high concordance for well‐covered coding variants, supporting the use of WES as a screening tool for heterogeneous disorders, and recommend the use of supplementary Sanger sequencing for poorly‐covered genes when the clinical suspicion is high. Importantly, despite remaining difficulties with achieving complete coverage of the whole exome, 10 (38.5%) of the 26 compared patients were diagnosed through WES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5023935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50239352016-09-20 Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care Hamilton, Alison Tétreault, Martine Dyment, David A. Zou, Ruobing Kernohan, Kristin Geraghty, Michael T. Hartley, Taila Boycott, Kym M. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles The clinical translation of next‐generation sequencing has created a paradigm shift in the diagnostic assessment of individuals with suspected rare genetic diseases. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously examines the majority of the coding portion of the genome and is rapidly becoming accepted as an efficient alternative to clinical Sanger sequencing for diagnosing genetically heterogeneous disorders. Among reports of the clinical and diagnostic utility of WES, few studies to date have directly compared its concordance to Sanger sequencing, which is considered the clinical “gold standard”. We performed a direct comparison of 391 coding and noncoding polymorphisms and variants of unknown significance identified by clinical Sanger sequencing to the WES results of 26 patients. Of the 150 well‐covered coding variants identified by Sanger sequencing, 146 (97.3%) were also reported by WES. Nine genes were excluded from the comparison due to consistently low coverage in WES, which might be attributed to the use of older exome capture kits. We performed confirmatory Sanger sequencing of discordant variants; including five variants with discordant bases and four with discordant zygosity. Confirmatory Sanger sequencing supported the original Sanger report for three of the five discordant bases, one was shown to be a false positive supporting the WES data, and one result differed from both the Sanger and WES data. Two of the discordant zygosity results supported Sanger and the other two supported WES data. We report high concordance for well‐covered coding variants, supporting the use of WES as a screening tool for heterogeneous disorders, and recommend the use of supplementary Sanger sequencing for poorly‐covered genes when the clinical suspicion is high. Importantly, despite remaining difficulties with achieving complete coverage of the whole exome, 10 (38.5%) of the 26 compared patients were diagnosed through WES. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5023935/ /pubmed/27652278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hamilton, Alison
Tétreault, Martine
Dyment, David A.
Zou, Ruobing
Kernohan, Kristin
Geraghty, Michael T.
Hartley, Taila
Boycott, Kym M.
Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title_full Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title_fullStr Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title_full_unstemmed Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title_short Concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical Sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
title_sort concordance between whole‐exome sequencing and clinical sanger sequencing: implications for patient care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.223
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonalison concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT tetreaultmartine concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT dymentdavida concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT zouruobing concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT kernohankristin concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT geraghtymichaelt concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT hartleytaila concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare
AT boycottkymm concordancebetweenwholeexomesequencingandclinicalsangersequencingimplicationsforpatientcare