Cargando…
Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755 |
_version_ | 1782453726958583808 |
---|---|
author | Gillespie, Iain A. Macdougall, Iain C. Richards, Sharon Jones, Vincent Marcelli, Daniele Froissart, Marc Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe |
author_facet | Gillespie, Iain A. Macdougall, Iain C. Richards, Sharon Jones, Vincent Marcelli, Daniele Froissart, Marc Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe |
author_sort | Gillespie, Iain A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the transition to this state. Reversibility of ESA hyporesponsiveness has also not been studied previously. METHODS: Case‐crossover methodology was applied to a cohort of 6645 European CKD patients undergoing haemodialysis and prescribed ESAs. Ninety‐day ESA exposure periods were defined, haemoglobin (Hb) response was calculated using the last 30 days of one period and the first 30 days of the next, and periods were classified based on a median ESA dose (80.8 IU/kg/week) and a 10 g/dL Hb threshold. Clinical, dialysis and laboratory data from patients' first hyporesponsive ‘case’ period was compared with the preceding responsive ‘control’ period using conditional logistic regression. A similar approach was applied to hyporesponsiveness reversal. RESULTS: Of the patients, 672 experienced hyporesponsiveness periods with preceding responsive periods; 711 reversed to normality from hyporesponsiveness periods. Transition to hyporesponsiveness was associated with hospitalization, vascular access changes or worsening inflammation, with these factors accounting for over two‐thirds of transitions. Findings were largely insensitive to alternative ESA doses and Hb thresholds. Continued hospitalization, catheter insertion and uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism were associated with a lack of regain of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Transition to hyporesponsiveness is linked to the development of conditions such as hospitalization events, vascular access issues or episodes of systemic inflammation. However, a third of hyporesponsive episodes remain unexplained. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5024014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50240142016-09-23 Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study Gillespie, Iain A. Macdougall, Iain C. Richards, Sharon Jones, Vincent Marcelli, Daniele Froissart, Marc Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Reports PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the transition to this state. Reversibility of ESA hyporesponsiveness has also not been studied previously. METHODS: Case‐crossover methodology was applied to a cohort of 6645 European CKD patients undergoing haemodialysis and prescribed ESAs. Ninety‐day ESA exposure periods were defined, haemoglobin (Hb) response was calculated using the last 30 days of one period and the first 30 days of the next, and periods were classified based on a median ESA dose (80.8 IU/kg/week) and a 10 g/dL Hb threshold. Clinical, dialysis and laboratory data from patients' first hyporesponsive ‘case’ period was compared with the preceding responsive ‘control’ period using conditional logistic regression. A similar approach was applied to hyporesponsiveness reversal. RESULTS: Of the patients, 672 experienced hyporesponsiveness periods with preceding responsive periods; 711 reversed to normality from hyporesponsiveness periods. Transition to hyporesponsiveness was associated with hospitalization, vascular access changes or worsening inflammation, with these factors accounting for over two‐thirds of transitions. Findings were largely insensitive to alternative ESA doses and Hb thresholds. Continued hospitalization, catheter insertion and uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism were associated with a lack of regain of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Transition to hyporesponsiveness is linked to the development of conditions such as hospitalization events, vascular access issues or episodes of systemic inflammation. However, a third of hyporesponsive episodes remain unexplained. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-17 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5024014/ /pubmed/25690434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Gillespie, Iain A. Macdougall, Iain C. Richards, Sharon Jones, Vincent Marcelli, Daniele Froissart, Marc Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study |
title | Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
|
title_full | Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
|
title_fullStr | Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
|
title_full_unstemmed | Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
|
title_short | Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
|
title_sort | factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a european haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillespieiaina factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT macdougalliainc factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT richardssharon factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT jonesvincent factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT marcellidaniele factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT froissartmarc factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT eckardtkaiuwe factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy AT factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy |