Cargando…

Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study

PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Iain A., Macdougall, Iain C., Richards, Sharon, Jones, Vincent, Marcelli, Daniele, Froissart, Marc, Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755
_version_ 1782453726958583808
author Gillespie, Iain A.
Macdougall, Iain C.
Richards, Sharon
Jones, Vincent
Marcelli, Daniele
Froissart, Marc
Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe
author_facet Gillespie, Iain A.
Macdougall, Iain C.
Richards, Sharon
Jones, Vincent
Marcelli, Daniele
Froissart, Marc
Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe
author_sort Gillespie, Iain A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the transition to this state. Reversibility of ESA hyporesponsiveness has also not been studied previously. METHODS: Case‐crossover methodology was applied to a cohort of 6645 European CKD patients undergoing haemodialysis and prescribed ESAs. Ninety‐day ESA exposure periods were defined, haemoglobin (Hb) response was calculated using the last 30 days of one period and the first 30 days of the next, and periods were classified based on a median ESA dose (80.8 IU/kg/week) and a 10 g/dL Hb threshold. Clinical, dialysis and laboratory data from patients' first hyporesponsive ‘case’ period was compared with the preceding responsive ‘control’ period using conditional logistic regression. A similar approach was applied to hyporesponsiveness reversal. RESULTS: Of the patients, 672 experienced hyporesponsiveness periods with preceding responsive periods; 711 reversed to normality from hyporesponsiveness periods. Transition to hyporesponsiveness was associated with hospitalization, vascular access changes or worsening inflammation, with these factors accounting for over two‐thirds of transitions. Findings were largely insensitive to alternative ESA doses and Hb thresholds. Continued hospitalization, catheter insertion and uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism were associated with a lack of regain of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Transition to hyporesponsiveness is linked to the development of conditions such as hospitalization events, vascular access issues or episodes of systemic inflammation. However, a third of hyporesponsive episodes remain unexplained. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5024014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50240142016-09-23 Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study Gillespie, Iain A. Macdougall, Iain C. Richards, Sharon Jones, Vincent Marcelli, Daniele Froissart, Marc Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Reports PURPOSE: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) is clinically and economically important in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Previous studies focused on baseline predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness, rather than factors associated with the transition to this state. Reversibility of ESA hyporesponsiveness has also not been studied previously. METHODS: Case‐crossover methodology was applied to a cohort of 6645 European CKD patients undergoing haemodialysis and prescribed ESAs. Ninety‐day ESA exposure periods were defined, haemoglobin (Hb) response was calculated using the last 30 days of one period and the first 30 days of the next, and periods were classified based on a median ESA dose (80.8 IU/kg/week) and a 10 g/dL Hb threshold. Clinical, dialysis and laboratory data from patients' first hyporesponsive ‘case’ period was compared with the preceding responsive ‘control’ period using conditional logistic regression. A similar approach was applied to hyporesponsiveness reversal. RESULTS: Of the patients, 672 experienced hyporesponsiveness periods with preceding responsive periods; 711 reversed to normality from hyporesponsiveness periods. Transition to hyporesponsiveness was associated with hospitalization, vascular access changes or worsening inflammation, with these factors accounting for over two‐thirds of transitions. Findings were largely insensitive to alternative ESA doses and Hb thresholds. Continued hospitalization, catheter insertion and uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism were associated with a lack of regain of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Transition to hyporesponsiveness is linked to the development of conditions such as hospitalization events, vascular access issues or episodes of systemic inflammation. However, a third of hyporesponsive episodes remain unexplained. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-17 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5024014/ /pubmed/25690434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Reports
Gillespie, Iain A.
Macdougall, Iain C.
Richards, Sharon
Jones, Vincent
Marcelli, Daniele
Froissart, Marc
Eckardt, Kai‐Uwe
Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title_full Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title_fullStr Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title_short Factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a European haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
title_sort factors precipitating erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent responsiveness in a european haemodialysis cohort: case‐crossover study
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3755
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespieiaina factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT macdougalliainc factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT richardssharon factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT jonesvincent factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT marcellidaniele factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT froissartmarc factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT eckardtkaiuwe factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy
AT factorsprecipitatingerythropoiesisstimulatingagentresponsivenessinaeuropeanhaemodialysiscohortcasecrossoverstudy