Cargando…
Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in refractory epilepsy and depression and is being investigated in heart failure, headache, gastric motility disorders and asthma. The first VNS device required surgical implantation of electrodes and a stimulator. Adverse events (AEs) are generally associa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12629 |
_version_ | 1782453733354897408 |
---|---|
author | Ben‐Menachem, E. Revesz, D. Simon, B. J. Silberstein, S. |
author_facet | Ben‐Menachem, E. Revesz, D. Simon, B. J. Silberstein, S. |
author_sort | Ben‐Menachem, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in refractory epilepsy and depression and is being investigated in heart failure, headache, gastric motility disorders and asthma. The first VNS device required surgical implantation of electrodes and a stimulator. Adverse events (AEs) are generally associated with implantation or continuous on−off stimulation. Infection is the most serious implantation‐associated AE. Bradycardia and asystole have also been described during implantation, as has vocal cord paresis, which can last up to 6 months and depends on surgical skill and experience. The most frequent stimulation‐associated AEs include voice alteration, paresthesia, cough, headache, dyspnea, pharyngitis and pain, which may require a decrease in stimulation strength or intermittent or permanent device deactivation. Newer non‐invasive VNS delivery systems do not require surgery and permit patient‐administered stimulation on demand. These non‐invasive VNS systems improve the safety and tolerability of VNS, making it more accessible and facilitating further investigations across a wider range of uses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5024045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50240452016-09-23 Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability Ben‐Menachem, E. Revesz, D. Simon, B. J. Silberstein, S. Eur J Neurol Review Article Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in refractory epilepsy and depression and is being investigated in heart failure, headache, gastric motility disorders and asthma. The first VNS device required surgical implantation of electrodes and a stimulator. Adverse events (AEs) are generally associated with implantation or continuous on−off stimulation. Infection is the most serious implantation‐associated AE. Bradycardia and asystole have also been described during implantation, as has vocal cord paresis, which can last up to 6 months and depends on surgical skill and experience. The most frequent stimulation‐associated AEs include voice alteration, paresthesia, cough, headache, dyspnea, pharyngitis and pain, which may require a decrease in stimulation strength or intermittent or permanent device deactivation. Newer non‐invasive VNS delivery systems do not require surgery and permit patient‐administered stimulation on demand. These non‐invasive VNS systems improve the safety and tolerability of VNS, making it more accessible and facilitating further investigations across a wider range of uses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-23 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5024045/ /pubmed/25614179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12629 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ben‐Menachem, E. Revesz, D. Simon, B. J. Silberstein, S. Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title | Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title_full | Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title_fullStr | Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title_short | Surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
title_sort | surgically implanted and non‐invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benmenacheme surgicallyimplantedandnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationareviewofefficacysafetyandtolerability AT reveszd surgicallyimplantedandnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationareviewofefficacysafetyandtolerability AT simonbj surgicallyimplantedandnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationareviewofefficacysafetyandtolerability AT silbersteins surgicallyimplantedandnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationareviewofefficacysafetyandtolerability |