Cargando…

Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Identifying the subset of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) at the highest risk of recurrence remains challenging, and better prognostic markers are needed. Gleason score is the best predictor of PCa aggressiveness and prognosis. In the present study, we generated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geybels, Milan S., Wright, Jonathan L., Bibikova, Marina, Klotzle, Brandy, Fan, Jian-Bing, Zhao, Shanshan, Feng, Ziding, Ostrander, Elaine A., Lin, Daniel W., Nelson, Peter S., Stanford, Janet L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0260-z
_version_ 1782453794265628672
author Geybels, Milan S.
Wright, Jonathan L.
Bibikova, Marina
Klotzle, Brandy
Fan, Jian-Bing
Zhao, Shanshan
Feng, Ziding
Ostrander, Elaine A.
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Stanford, Janet L.
author_facet Geybels, Milan S.
Wright, Jonathan L.
Bibikova, Marina
Klotzle, Brandy
Fan, Jian-Bing
Zhao, Shanshan
Feng, Ziding
Ostrander, Elaine A.
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Stanford, Janet L.
author_sort Geybels, Milan S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying the subset of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) at the highest risk of recurrence remains challenging, and better prognostic markers are needed. Gleason score is the best predictor of PCa aggressiveness and prognosis. In the present study, we generated an epigenetic signature based on high versus low Gleason score tumors and evaluated its ability to predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Genome-wide DNA methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; no. of patients = 333) and the elastic net method were used to generate an epigenetic signature by contrasting patients with high (8–10) versus low (≤6) Gleason score tumors. The signature was then tested in a cohort of 523 patients with clinically localized disease who had radical prostatectomy. Samples taken from the primary tumor were used for DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiling. Patients were followed for PCa recurrence on average for 8 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: The epigenetic signature includes 52 differentially methylated CpG sites. In the testing cohort, the signature was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio per 25 % increase = 1.78; 95 % confidence interval 1.48, 2.16). The signature significantly improved the area under the curve (AUC) for PCa recurrence compared to clinical-pathological parameters alone, particularly among patients diagnosed with Gleason score 7 tumors (0.64 vs. 0.76, P = 1.34E−4). Results were comparable for patients with Gleason 3 + 4 and those with 4 + 3 tumors. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that higher levels of the signature were associated with increased expression of genes related to cell cycle proliferation and decreased expression of androgen-responsive genes. CONCLUSIONS: This report shows evidence that DNA methylation patterns measured in prostate tumor cells are predictive of PCa aggressiveness. The epigenetic signature may have clinical utility to improve prognostication particularly in patients with intermediate Gleason score 7 tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0260-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5024414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50244142016-09-20 Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy Geybels, Milan S. Wright, Jonathan L. Bibikova, Marina Klotzle, Brandy Fan, Jian-Bing Zhao, Shanshan Feng, Ziding Ostrander, Elaine A. Lin, Daniel W. Nelson, Peter S. Stanford, Janet L. Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Identifying the subset of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) at the highest risk of recurrence remains challenging, and better prognostic markers are needed. Gleason score is the best predictor of PCa aggressiveness and prognosis. In the present study, we generated an epigenetic signature based on high versus low Gleason score tumors and evaluated its ability to predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Genome-wide DNA methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; no. of patients = 333) and the elastic net method were used to generate an epigenetic signature by contrasting patients with high (8–10) versus low (≤6) Gleason score tumors. The signature was then tested in a cohort of 523 patients with clinically localized disease who had radical prostatectomy. Samples taken from the primary tumor were used for DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiling. Patients were followed for PCa recurrence on average for 8 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: The epigenetic signature includes 52 differentially methylated CpG sites. In the testing cohort, the signature was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio per 25 % increase = 1.78; 95 % confidence interval 1.48, 2.16). The signature significantly improved the area under the curve (AUC) for PCa recurrence compared to clinical-pathological parameters alone, particularly among patients diagnosed with Gleason score 7 tumors (0.64 vs. 0.76, P = 1.34E−4). Results were comparable for patients with Gleason 3 + 4 and those with 4 + 3 tumors. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that higher levels of the signature were associated with increased expression of genes related to cell cycle proliferation and decreased expression of androgen-responsive genes. CONCLUSIONS: This report shows evidence that DNA methylation patterns measured in prostate tumor cells are predictive of PCa aggressiveness. The epigenetic signature may have clinical utility to improve prognostication particularly in patients with intermediate Gleason score 7 tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0260-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5024414/ /pubmed/27651837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0260-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Geybels, Milan S.
Wright, Jonathan L.
Bibikova, Marina
Klotzle, Brandy
Fan, Jian-Bing
Zhao, Shanshan
Feng, Ziding
Ostrander, Elaine A.
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Stanford, Janet L.
Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title_full Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title_short Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
title_sort epigenetic signature of gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0260-z
work_keys_str_mv AT geybelsmilans epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wrightjonathanl epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT bibikovamarina epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT klotzlebrandy epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT fanjianbing epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT zhaoshanshan epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT fengziding epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT ostranderelainea epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT lindanielw epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT nelsonpeters epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy
AT stanfordjanetl epigeneticsignatureofgleasonscoreandprostatecancerrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomy