Cargando…
The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity
BACKGROUND: Although the majority of small in-frame insertions/deletions (indels) has no/little affect on protein function, a small subset of these changes has been causally associated with genetic disorders. Notably, the molecular mechanisms and frequency by which they give rise to disease phenotyp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0 |
_version_ | 1782453805089030144 |
---|---|
author | Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I. Barton, Stephanie J. Waller, Sarah Perveen, Rahat Ellingford, Jamie M. Campbell, Christopher Hall, Georgina Gillespie, Rachel L. Bhaskar, Sanjeev S. Ramsden, Simon C. Black, Graeme C. Lovell, Simon C. |
author_facet | Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I. Barton, Stephanie J. Waller, Sarah Perveen, Rahat Ellingford, Jamie M. Campbell, Christopher Hall, Georgina Gillespie, Rachel L. Bhaskar, Sanjeev S. Ramsden, Simon C. Black, Graeme C. Lovell, Simon C. |
author_sort | Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the majority of small in-frame insertions/deletions (indels) has no/little affect on protein function, a small subset of these changes has been causally associated with genetic disorders. Notably, the molecular mechanisms and frequency by which they give rise to disease phenotypes remain largely unknown. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the role of in-frame indels (≤21 nucleotides) in two genetically heterogeneous eye disorders. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one probands with childhood cataracts and 486 probands with retinal dystrophy underwent multigene panel testing in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. In-frame indels were collected and evaluated both clinically and in silico. Variants that could be modeled in the context of protein structure were identified and analysed using integrative structural modeling. Overall, 55 small in-frame indels were detected in 112 of 667 probands (16.8 %); 17 of these changes were novel to this study and 18 variants were reported clinically. A reliable model of the corresponding protein sequence could be generated for 8 variants. Structural modeling indicated a diverse range of molecular mechanisms of disease including disruption of secondary and tertiary protein structure and alteration of protein-DNA binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: In childhood cataract and retinal dystrophy subjects, one small in-frame indel is clinically reported in every ~37 individuals tested. The clinical utility of computational tools evaluating these changes increases when the full complexity of the involved molecular mechanisms is embraced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5024463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50244632016-09-20 The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I. Barton, Stephanie J. Waller, Sarah Perveen, Rahat Ellingford, Jamie M. Campbell, Christopher Hall, Georgina Gillespie, Rachel L. Bhaskar, Sanjeev S. Ramsden, Simon C. Black, Graeme C. Lovell, Simon C. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Although the majority of small in-frame insertions/deletions (indels) has no/little affect on protein function, a small subset of these changes has been causally associated with genetic disorders. Notably, the molecular mechanisms and frequency by which they give rise to disease phenotypes remain largely unknown. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the role of in-frame indels (≤21 nucleotides) in two genetically heterogeneous eye disorders. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one probands with childhood cataracts and 486 probands with retinal dystrophy underwent multigene panel testing in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. In-frame indels were collected and evaluated both clinically and in silico. Variants that could be modeled in the context of protein structure were identified and analysed using integrative structural modeling. Overall, 55 small in-frame indels were detected in 112 of 667 probands (16.8 %); 17 of these changes were novel to this study and 18 variants were reported clinically. A reliable model of the corresponding protein sequence could be generated for 8 variants. Structural modeling indicated a diverse range of molecular mechanisms of disease including disruption of secondary and tertiary protein structure and alteration of protein-DNA binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: In childhood cataract and retinal dystrophy subjects, one small in-frame indel is clinically reported in every ~37 individuals tested. The clinical utility of computational tools evaluating these changes increases when the full complexity of the involved molecular mechanisms is embraced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5024463/ /pubmed/27628848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I. Barton, Stephanie J. Waller, Sarah Perveen, Rahat Ellingford, Jamie M. Campbell, Christopher Hall, Georgina Gillespie, Rachel L. Bhaskar, Sanjeev S. Ramsden, Simon C. Black, Graeme C. Lovell, Simon C. The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title | The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title_full | The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title_fullStr | The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title_short | The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
title_sort | role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sergouniotispanagiotisi theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT bartonstephaniej theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT wallersarah theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT perveenrahat theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT ellingfordjamiem theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT campbellchristopher theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT hallgeorgina theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT gillespierachell theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT bhaskarsanjeevs theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT ramsdensimonc theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT blackgraemec theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT lovellsimonc theroleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT sergouniotispanagiotisi roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT bartonstephaniej roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT wallersarah roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT perveenrahat roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT ellingfordjamiem roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT campbellchristopher roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT hallgeorgina roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT gillespierachell roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT bhaskarsanjeevs roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT ramsdensimonc roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT blackgraemec roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity AT lovellsimonc roleofsmallinframeinsertionsdeletionsininheritedeyedisordersandhowstructuralmodellingcanhelpestimatetheirpathogenicity |