Cargando…

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Primary treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer consists of chemotherapy either before (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NACT) or after primary surgery (adjuvant chemotherapy). The goal of primary treatment is no residual disease after surgery (R0 resection) what is associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Škof, Erik, Merlo, Sebastjan, Pilko, Gasper, Kobal, Borut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0034
_version_ 1782453825705082880
author Škof, Erik
Merlo, Sebastjan
Pilko, Gasper
Kobal, Borut
author_facet Škof, Erik
Merlo, Sebastjan
Pilko, Gasper
Kobal, Borut
author_sort Škof, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer consists of chemotherapy either before (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NACT) or after primary surgery (adjuvant chemotherapy). The goal of primary treatment is no residual disease after surgery (R0 resection) what is associated with an improvement in survival of patients. There is, however, no evidence of survival benefits in patients with R0 resections after prior NACT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were treated with diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in the years 2005–2007. The differences in the rates of R0 resections, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and in five-year and eight-year survival rates between patients treated with NACT and patients who had primary surgery were compared. RESULTS: Overall 160 patients had stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer. Eighty patients had NACT and eighty patients had primary surgery. Patients in NACT group had higher rates of R0 resection (42% vs. 20%; p = 0.011) than patients after primary surgery. PFS was 14.1 months in NACT group and 17.7 months after primary surgery (p = 0.213). OS was 24.8 months in NACT group and 31.6 months after primary surgery (p = 0.012). In patients with R0 resections five-year and eight-year survival rates were 20.6% and 17.6% in NACT group compared to 62.5% and 62.5% after primary surgery (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher rates of R0 resections achieved by NACT, survival of patients treated with NACT was inferior to survival of patients who underwent primary surgery. NACT should only be offered to patients with advanced epithelial cancer who are not candidates for primary surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5024662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50246622016-09-27 The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer Škof, Erik Merlo, Sebastjan Pilko, Gasper Kobal, Borut Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer consists of chemotherapy either before (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NACT) or after primary surgery (adjuvant chemotherapy). The goal of primary treatment is no residual disease after surgery (R0 resection) what is associated with an improvement in survival of patients. There is, however, no evidence of survival benefits in patients with R0 resections after prior NACT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were treated with diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in the years 2005–2007. The differences in the rates of R0 resections, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and in five-year and eight-year survival rates between patients treated with NACT and patients who had primary surgery were compared. RESULTS: Overall 160 patients had stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer. Eighty patients had NACT and eighty patients had primary surgery. Patients in NACT group had higher rates of R0 resection (42% vs. 20%; p = 0.011) than patients after primary surgery. PFS was 14.1 months in NACT group and 17.7 months after primary surgery (p = 0.213). OS was 24.8 months in NACT group and 31.6 months after primary surgery (p = 0.012). In patients with R0 resections five-year and eight-year survival rates were 20.6% and 17.6% in NACT group compared to 62.5% and 62.5% after primary surgery (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher rates of R0 resections achieved by NACT, survival of patients treated with NACT was inferior to survival of patients who underwent primary surgery. NACT should only be offered to patients with advanced epithelial cancer who are not candidates for primary surgery. De Gruyter 2016-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5024662/ /pubmed/27679552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0034 Text en © 2016 Radiol Oncol This content is free.
spellingShingle Research Article
Škof, Erik
Merlo, Sebastjan
Pilko, Gasper
Kobal, Borut
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title_fullStr The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title_short The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer
title_sort role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage iiic) epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0034
work_keys_str_mv AT skoferik theroleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT merlosebastjan theroleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT pilkogasper theroleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT kobalborut theroleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT skoferik roleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT merlosebastjan roleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT pilkogasper roleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer
AT kobalborut roleofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedstageiiicepithelialovariancancer