Cargando…

A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies

Objective: To develop a classification system for congenital spine anomalies detected by prenatal ultrasound. Methods: Data were collected from fetuses with spine abnormalities diagnosed in our institution over a five‐year period between June 2005 and June 2010. The ultrasound images were analysed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paoletti, Debra, Robertson, Meiri, Sia, Sock Bee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00081.x
_version_ 1782453862458720256
author Paoletti, Debra
Robertson, Meiri
Sia, Sock Bee
author_facet Paoletti, Debra
Robertson, Meiri
Sia, Sock Bee
author_sort Paoletti, Debra
collection PubMed
description Objective: To develop a classification system for congenital spine anomalies detected by prenatal ultrasound. Methods: Data were collected from fetuses with spine abnormalities diagnosed in our institution over a five‐year period between June 2005 and June 2010. The ultrasound images were analysed to determine which features were associated with different congenital spine anomalies. Findings of the prenatal ultrasound images were correlated with other prenatal imaging, post mortem findings, post mortem imaging, neonatal imaging, karyotype, and other genetic workup. Data from published case reports of prenatal diagnosis of rare congenital spine anomalies were analysed to provide a comprehensive work. Results: During the study period, eighteen cases of spine abnormalities were diagnosed in 7819 women. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 18.8w ± 2.2 SD. While most cases represented open NTD, a spectrum of vertebral abnormalities were diagnosed prenatally. These included hemivertebrae, block vertebrae, cleft or butterfly vertebrae, sacral agenesis, and a lipomeningocele. The most sensitive features for diagnosis of a spine abnormality included flaring of the vertebral arch ossification centres, abnormal spine curvature, and short spine length. While reported findings at the time of diagnosis were often conservative, retrospective analysis revealed good correlation with radiographic imaging. 3D imaging was found to be a valuable tool in many settings. Conclusions: Analysis of the study findings showed prenatal ultrasound allowed detection of disruption to the normal appearances of the fetal spine. Using the three features of flaring of the vertebral arch ossification centres, abnormal spine curvature, and short spine length, an algorithm was devised to aid with the diagnosis of spine anomalies for those who perform and report prenatal ultrasound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5024920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50249202017-02-10 A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies Paoletti, Debra Robertson, Meiri Sia, Sock Bee Australas J Ultrasound Med Review Objective: To develop a classification system for congenital spine anomalies detected by prenatal ultrasound. Methods: Data were collected from fetuses with spine abnormalities diagnosed in our institution over a five‐year period between June 2005 and June 2010. The ultrasound images were analysed to determine which features were associated with different congenital spine anomalies. Findings of the prenatal ultrasound images were correlated with other prenatal imaging, post mortem findings, post mortem imaging, neonatal imaging, karyotype, and other genetic workup. Data from published case reports of prenatal diagnosis of rare congenital spine anomalies were analysed to provide a comprehensive work. Results: During the study period, eighteen cases of spine abnormalities were diagnosed in 7819 women. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 18.8w ± 2.2 SD. While most cases represented open NTD, a spectrum of vertebral abnormalities were diagnosed prenatally. These included hemivertebrae, block vertebrae, cleft or butterfly vertebrae, sacral agenesis, and a lipomeningocele. The most sensitive features for diagnosis of a spine abnormality included flaring of the vertebral arch ossification centres, abnormal spine curvature, and short spine length. While reported findings at the time of diagnosis were often conservative, retrospective analysis revealed good correlation with radiographic imaging. 3D imaging was found to be a valuable tool in many settings. Conclusions: Analysis of the study findings showed prenatal ultrasound allowed detection of disruption to the normal appearances of the fetal spine. Using the three features of flaring of the vertebral arch ossification centres, abnormal spine curvature, and short spine length, an algorithm was devised to aid with the diagnosis of spine anomalies for those who perform and report prenatal ultrasound. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-31 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5024920/ /pubmed/28191204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00081.x Text en © 2014 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
spellingShingle Review
Paoletti, Debra
Robertson, Meiri
Sia, Sock Bee
A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title_full A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title_fullStr A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title_full_unstemmed A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title_short A sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
title_sort sonographic approach to prenatal classification of congenital spine anomalies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00081.x
work_keys_str_mv AT paolettidebra asonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies
AT robertsonmeiri asonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies
AT siasockbee asonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies
AT paolettidebra sonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies
AT robertsonmeiri sonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies
AT siasockbee sonographicapproachtoprenatalclassificationofcongenitalspineanomalies