Cargando…
Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Prod...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27632367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419 |
_version_ | 1782453893361303552 |
---|---|
author | Prost, Sandrine Kishen, Ria E. B. Kluth, David C. Bellamy, Christopher O. C. |
author_facet | Prost, Sandrine Kishen, Ria E. B. Kluth, David C. Bellamy, Christopher O. C. |
author_sort | Prost, Sandrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Product information is often limited to wavelengths used for older fluorophores (FITC, TRITC & corresponding Alexa dyes family). Consequently, novel agents such as Quantum dots are not widely appreciated or used, despite highly favourable properties including extremely bright emission, stability and potentially reduced tissue autofluorescence at the excitation wavelength. Using spectral analysis, we report here a detailed critical appraisal and comparative evaluation of different light sources and fluorophores in multiplex immunofluorescence of clinical biopsy sections. The comparison includes mercury light, metal halide and 3 different LED-based systems, using 7 Qdots (525, 565, 585, 605, 625, 705), Cy3 and Cy5. We discuss the considerations relevant to achieving the best combination of light source and fluorophore for accurate multiplex fluorescence quantitation. We highlight practical limitations and confounders to quantitation with filter-based approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5025086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50250862016-09-27 Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections Prost, Sandrine Kishen, Ria E. B. Kluth, David C. Bellamy, Christopher O. C. PLoS One Research Article The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Product information is often limited to wavelengths used for older fluorophores (FITC, TRITC & corresponding Alexa dyes family). Consequently, novel agents such as Quantum dots are not widely appreciated or used, despite highly favourable properties including extremely bright emission, stability and potentially reduced tissue autofluorescence at the excitation wavelength. Using spectral analysis, we report here a detailed critical appraisal and comparative evaluation of different light sources and fluorophores in multiplex immunofluorescence of clinical biopsy sections. The comparison includes mercury light, metal halide and 3 different LED-based systems, using 7 Qdots (525, 565, 585, 605, 625, 705), Cy3 and Cy5. We discuss the considerations relevant to achieving the best combination of light source and fluorophore for accurate multiplex fluorescence quantitation. We highlight practical limitations and confounders to quantitation with filter-based approaches. Public Library of Science 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025086/ /pubmed/27632367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419 Text en © 2016 Prost et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Prost, Sandrine Kishen, Ria E. B. Kluth, David C. Bellamy, Christopher O. C. Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title | Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title_full | Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title_fullStr | Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title_short | Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections |
title_sort | choice of illumination system & fluorophore for multiplex immunofluorescence on ffpe tissue sections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27632367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prostsandrine choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections AT kishenriaeb choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections AT kluthdavidc choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections AT bellamychristopheroc choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections |