Cargando…

Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections

The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Prod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prost, Sandrine, Kishen, Ria E. B., Kluth, David C., Bellamy, Christopher O. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27632367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419
_version_ 1782453893361303552
author Prost, Sandrine
Kishen, Ria E. B.
Kluth, David C.
Bellamy, Christopher O. C.
author_facet Prost, Sandrine
Kishen, Ria E. B.
Kluth, David C.
Bellamy, Christopher O. C.
author_sort Prost, Sandrine
collection PubMed
description The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Product information is often limited to wavelengths used for older fluorophores (FITC, TRITC & corresponding Alexa dyes family). Consequently, novel agents such as Quantum dots are not widely appreciated or used, despite highly favourable properties including extremely bright emission, stability and potentially reduced tissue autofluorescence at the excitation wavelength. Using spectral analysis, we report here a detailed critical appraisal and comparative evaluation of different light sources and fluorophores in multiplex immunofluorescence of clinical biopsy sections. The comparison includes mercury light, metal halide and 3 different LED-based systems, using 7 Qdots (525, 565, 585, 605, 625, 705), Cy3 and Cy5. We discuss the considerations relevant to achieving the best combination of light source and fluorophore for accurate multiplex fluorescence quantitation. We highlight practical limitations and confounders to quantitation with filter-based approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50250862016-09-27 Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections Prost, Sandrine Kishen, Ria E. B. Kluth, David C. Bellamy, Christopher O. C. PLoS One Research Article The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Product information is often limited to wavelengths used for older fluorophores (FITC, TRITC & corresponding Alexa dyes family). Consequently, novel agents such as Quantum dots are not widely appreciated or used, despite highly favourable properties including extremely bright emission, stability and potentially reduced tissue autofluorescence at the excitation wavelength. Using spectral analysis, we report here a detailed critical appraisal and comparative evaluation of different light sources and fluorophores in multiplex immunofluorescence of clinical biopsy sections. The comparison includes mercury light, metal halide and 3 different LED-based systems, using 7 Qdots (525, 565, 585, 605, 625, 705), Cy3 and Cy5. We discuss the considerations relevant to achieving the best combination of light source and fluorophore for accurate multiplex fluorescence quantitation. We highlight practical limitations and confounders to quantitation with filter-based approaches. Public Library of Science 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025086/ /pubmed/27632367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419 Text en © 2016 Prost et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prost, Sandrine
Kishen, Ria E. B.
Kluth, David C.
Bellamy, Christopher O. C.
Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title_full Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title_fullStr Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title_full_unstemmed Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title_short Choice of Illumination System & Fluorophore for Multiplex Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections
title_sort choice of illumination system & fluorophore for multiplex immunofluorescence on ffpe tissue sections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27632367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419
work_keys_str_mv AT prostsandrine choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections
AT kishenriaeb choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections
AT kluthdavidc choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections
AT bellamychristopheroc choiceofilluminationsystemfluorophoreformultipleximmunofluorescenceonffpetissuesections