Cargando…

Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacella, Elena, Mipatrini, Daniele, Pacella, Fernanda, Amorelli, Giulia, Bottone, Andrea, Smaldone, Gianpaolo, Turchetti, Paolo, La Torre, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827
_version_ 1782453896970502144
author Pacella, Elena
Mipatrini, Daniele
Pacella, Fernanda
Amorelli, Giulia
Bottone, Andrea
Smaldone, Gianpaolo
Turchetti, Paolo
La Torre, Giuseppe
author_facet Pacella, Elena
Mipatrini, Daniele
Pacella, Fernanda
Amorelli, Giulia
Bottone, Andrea
Smaldone, Gianpaolo
Turchetti, Paolo
La Torre, Giuseppe
author_sort Pacella, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have been introduced. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore that of systematically reviewing the functional results and the rate of complications of different synthetic materials, as compared to autogenous Fascia Lata. The primary objective was to determine the rates of Successful Surgeries (SSs) of these materials. The secondary objective was to assess the onset of complications. The following materials were investigated: Fascia Lata, Mersilene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Silicon. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: Following the Prisma procedure, on January 30(th), 2016 we used the following electronic databases to select the studies: MEDLINE and Scopus. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 48 publications that met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. All studies were non-comparative. PTFE (n = 5) showed the best rate of SSs among the materials compared (statistically significant). Surgeries performed with autogenous Fascia Lata (n = 19) had a 87% rate of success those performed with Mersilene (n = 12)had 92% and those performed with Silicon (n = 17)88%. PTFE had the best outcome, with 99% success rate. As for complications, surgeries performed with PTFE had a higher rate of suture infections (1.9%) as compared to Fascia Lata, but lower incidence for all other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies were good quality cohort studies, the overall quality of this evidence should be regarded as low due to their non-comparative design. Our data suggest that PTFE seems to be the most valid alternative material for frontalis suspension surgery, with low recurrence rates and good cosmetic and functional results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50251022016-09-27 Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies Pacella, Elena Mipatrini, Daniele Pacella, Fernanda Amorelli, Giulia Bottone, Andrea Smaldone, Gianpaolo Turchetti, Paolo La Torre, Giuseppe PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have been introduced. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore that of systematically reviewing the functional results and the rate of complications of different synthetic materials, as compared to autogenous Fascia Lata. The primary objective was to determine the rates of Successful Surgeries (SSs) of these materials. The secondary objective was to assess the onset of complications. The following materials were investigated: Fascia Lata, Mersilene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Silicon. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: Following the Prisma procedure, on January 30(th), 2016 we used the following electronic databases to select the studies: MEDLINE and Scopus. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 48 publications that met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. All studies were non-comparative. PTFE (n = 5) showed the best rate of SSs among the materials compared (statistically significant). Surgeries performed with autogenous Fascia Lata (n = 19) had a 87% rate of success those performed with Mersilene (n = 12)had 92% and those performed with Silicon (n = 17)88%. PTFE had the best outcome, with 99% success rate. As for complications, surgeries performed with PTFE had a higher rate of suture infections (1.9%) as compared to Fascia Lata, but lower incidence for all other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies were good quality cohort studies, the overall quality of this evidence should be regarded as low due to their non-comparative design. Our data suggest that PTFE seems to be the most valid alternative material for frontalis suspension surgery, with low recurrence rates and good cosmetic and functional results. Public Library of Science 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025102/ /pubmed/27631781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827 Text en © 2016 Pacella et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pacella, Elena
Mipatrini, Daniele
Pacella, Fernanda
Amorelli, Giulia
Bottone, Andrea
Smaldone, Gianpaolo
Turchetti, Paolo
La Torre, Giuseppe
Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title_full Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title_fullStr Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title_short Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
title_sort suspensory materials for surgery of blepharoptosis: a systematic review of observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827
work_keys_str_mv AT pacellaelena suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT mipatrinidaniele suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT pacellafernanda suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT amorelligiulia suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT bottoneandrea suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT smaldonegianpaolo suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT turchettipaolo suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT latorregiuseppe suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies