Cargando…
Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827 |
_version_ | 1782453896970502144 |
---|---|
author | Pacella, Elena Mipatrini, Daniele Pacella, Fernanda Amorelli, Giulia Bottone, Andrea Smaldone, Gianpaolo Turchetti, Paolo La Torre, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Pacella, Elena Mipatrini, Daniele Pacella, Fernanda Amorelli, Giulia Bottone, Andrea Smaldone, Gianpaolo Turchetti, Paolo La Torre, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Pacella, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have been introduced. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore that of systematically reviewing the functional results and the rate of complications of different synthetic materials, as compared to autogenous Fascia Lata. The primary objective was to determine the rates of Successful Surgeries (SSs) of these materials. The secondary objective was to assess the onset of complications. The following materials were investigated: Fascia Lata, Mersilene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Silicon. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: Following the Prisma procedure, on January 30(th), 2016 we used the following electronic databases to select the studies: MEDLINE and Scopus. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 48 publications that met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. All studies were non-comparative. PTFE (n = 5) showed the best rate of SSs among the materials compared (statistically significant). Surgeries performed with autogenous Fascia Lata (n = 19) had a 87% rate of success those performed with Mersilene (n = 12)had 92% and those performed with Silicon (n = 17)88%. PTFE had the best outcome, with 99% success rate. As for complications, surgeries performed with PTFE had a higher rate of suture infections (1.9%) as compared to Fascia Lata, but lower incidence for all other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies were good quality cohort studies, the overall quality of this evidence should be regarded as low due to their non-comparative design. Our data suggest that PTFE seems to be the most valid alternative material for frontalis suspension surgery, with low recurrence rates and good cosmetic and functional results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5025102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50251022016-09-27 Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies Pacella, Elena Mipatrini, Daniele Pacella, Fernanda Amorelli, Giulia Bottone, Andrea Smaldone, Gianpaolo Turchetti, Paolo La Torre, Giuseppe PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Frontalis suspension surgery is considered the procedure of choice in cases of blepharoptosis. Among all the materials used in this type of surgery, ophthalmic and plastic surgeons prefer to use autologous Fascia Lata. However, during years, other autogenous and exogenous materials have been introduced. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore that of systematically reviewing the functional results and the rate of complications of different synthetic materials, as compared to autogenous Fascia Lata. The primary objective was to determine the rates of Successful Surgeries (SSs) of these materials. The secondary objective was to assess the onset of complications. The following materials were investigated: Fascia Lata, Mersilene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Silicon. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: Following the Prisma procedure, on January 30(th), 2016 we used the following electronic databases to select the studies: MEDLINE and Scopus. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 48 publications that met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. All studies were non-comparative. PTFE (n = 5) showed the best rate of SSs among the materials compared (statistically significant). Surgeries performed with autogenous Fascia Lata (n = 19) had a 87% rate of success those performed with Mersilene (n = 12)had 92% and those performed with Silicon (n = 17)88%. PTFE had the best outcome, with 99% success rate. As for complications, surgeries performed with PTFE had a higher rate of suture infections (1.9%) as compared to Fascia Lata, but lower incidence for all other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies were good quality cohort studies, the overall quality of this evidence should be regarded as low due to their non-comparative design. Our data suggest that PTFE seems to be the most valid alternative material for frontalis suspension surgery, with low recurrence rates and good cosmetic and functional results. Public Library of Science 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025102/ /pubmed/27631781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827 Text en © 2016 Pacella et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pacella, Elena Mipatrini, Daniele Pacella, Fernanda Amorelli, Giulia Bottone, Andrea Smaldone, Gianpaolo Turchetti, Paolo La Torre, Giuseppe Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title | Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title_full | Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title_fullStr | Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title_short | Suspensory Materials for Surgery of Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies |
title_sort | suspensory materials for surgery of blepharoptosis: a systematic review of observational studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pacellaelena suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT mipatrinidaniele suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT pacellafernanda suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT amorelligiulia suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT bottoneandrea suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT smaldonegianpaolo suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT turchettipaolo suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies AT latorregiuseppe suspensorymaterialsforsurgeryofblepharoptosisasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies |