Cargando…
A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies
Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and streptococcal protein G (SpG) affinity chromatography are the gold standards for purifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in therapeutic applications. However, camelid V(H)H single-domain Abs (sdAbs or V(H)Hs) are not bound by SpG and only sporadically bound by SpA....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163113 |
_version_ | 1782453913482428416 |
---|---|
author | Henry, Kevin A. Sulea, Traian van Faassen, Henk Hussack, Greg Purisima, Enrico O. MacKenzie, C. Roger Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Mehdi |
author_facet | Henry, Kevin A. Sulea, Traian van Faassen, Henk Hussack, Greg Purisima, Enrico O. MacKenzie, C. Roger Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Mehdi |
author_sort | Henry, Kevin A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and streptococcal protein G (SpG) affinity chromatography are the gold standards for purifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in therapeutic applications. However, camelid V(H)H single-domain Abs (sdAbs or V(H)Hs) are not bound by SpG and only sporadically bound by SpA. Currently, V(H)Hs require affinity tag-based purification, which limits their therapeutic potential and adds considerable complexity and cost to their production. Here we describe a simple and rapid mutagenesis-based approach designed to confer SpA binding upon a priori non-SpA-binding V(H)Hs. We show that SpA binding of V(H)Hs is determined primarily by the same set of residues as in human mAbs, albeit with an unexpected degree of tolerance to substitutions at certain core and non-core positions and some limited dependence on at least one residue outside the SpA interface, and that SpA binding could be successfully introduced into five V(H)Hs against three different targets with no adverse effects on expression yield or antigen binding. Next-generation sequencing of llama, alpaca and dromedary V(H)H repertoires suggested that species differences in SpA binding may result from frequency variation in specific deleterious polymorphisms, especially Ile57. Thus, the SpA binding phenotype of camelid V(H)Hs can be easily modulated to take advantage of tag-less purification techniques, although the frequency with which this is required may depend on the source species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5025174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50251742016-09-27 A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies Henry, Kevin A. Sulea, Traian van Faassen, Henk Hussack, Greg Purisima, Enrico O. MacKenzie, C. Roger Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Mehdi PLoS One Research Article Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and streptococcal protein G (SpG) affinity chromatography are the gold standards for purifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in therapeutic applications. However, camelid V(H)H single-domain Abs (sdAbs or V(H)Hs) are not bound by SpG and only sporadically bound by SpA. Currently, V(H)Hs require affinity tag-based purification, which limits their therapeutic potential and adds considerable complexity and cost to their production. Here we describe a simple and rapid mutagenesis-based approach designed to confer SpA binding upon a priori non-SpA-binding V(H)Hs. We show that SpA binding of V(H)Hs is determined primarily by the same set of residues as in human mAbs, albeit with an unexpected degree of tolerance to substitutions at certain core and non-core positions and some limited dependence on at least one residue outside the SpA interface, and that SpA binding could be successfully introduced into five V(H)Hs against three different targets with no adverse effects on expression yield or antigen binding. Next-generation sequencing of llama, alpaca and dromedary V(H)H repertoires suggested that species differences in SpA binding may result from frequency variation in specific deleterious polymorphisms, especially Ile57. Thus, the SpA binding phenotype of camelid V(H)Hs can be easily modulated to take advantage of tag-less purification techniques, although the frequency with which this is required may depend on the source species. Public Library of Science 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025174/ /pubmed/27631624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163113 Text en © 2016 Henry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Henry, Kevin A. Sulea, Traian van Faassen, Henk Hussack, Greg Purisima, Enrico O. MacKenzie, C. Roger Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Mehdi A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title | A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title_full | A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title_fullStr | A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title_short | A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies |
title_sort | rational engineering strategy for designing protein a-binding camelid single-domain antibodies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henrykevina arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT suleatraian arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT vanfaassenhenk arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT hussackgreg arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT purisimaenricoo arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT mackenziecroger arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT arbabighahroudimehdi arationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT henrykevina rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT suleatraian rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT vanfaassenhenk rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT hussackgreg rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT purisimaenricoo rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT mackenziecroger rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies AT arbabighahroudimehdi rationalengineeringstrategyfordesigningproteinabindingcamelidsingledomainantibodies |