Cargando…

DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro and in vivo study in rats. OBJECTIVES: To design a novel rat spinal fixation device and investigate its biomechanical effectiveness in stabilizing the spine up to eight weeks post injury. METHODS: A fixation device made of polyetheretherketone was designed to stabilize the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahrokni, Maryam, Zhu, Qingan, Liu, Jie, Tetzlaff, Wolfram, Oxland, Thomas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22289899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.185
_version_ 1782453932754206720
author Shahrokni, Maryam
Zhu, Qingan
Liu, Jie
Tetzlaff, Wolfram
Oxland, Thomas R.
author_facet Shahrokni, Maryam
Zhu, Qingan
Liu, Jie
Tetzlaff, Wolfram
Oxland, Thomas R.
author_sort Shahrokni, Maryam
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro and in vivo study in rats. OBJECTIVES: To design a novel rat spinal fixation device and investigate its biomechanical effectiveness in stabilizing the spine up to eight weeks post injury. METHODS: A fixation device made of polyetheretherketone was designed to stabilize the spine via bilateral clamping pieces. The device effectiveness was assessed in a Sprague-Dawley rat model after it was applied to a spine with a fracture-dislocation injury produced at C5–C6. Animals were euthanized either immediately (n=6) or eight weeks (n=9) post-injury and the C3-T1 segment of the cervical spine was removed for biomechanical evaluation. Segments of intact spinal columns (C3-T1) (n=6) served as uninjured controls. In these tests, anterior-posterior shear forces were applied to the C3 vertebra to produce flexion and extension bending moments at the injury site (peak 12.8Nmm). The resultant two-dimensional motions at the injury site (i.e. C5–C6) were measured using digital imaging and reported as ranges of motion (ROM) or neutral zones (NZ). RESULTS: Flexion/extension ROMs (average ± S.D.) were 18.1 ± 3.3°, 19.9 ± 7.5°, and 1.5 ± 0.7°, respectively for the intact, injured/fixed, and injured/8-week groups, with the differences being highly significant for the injured/8-week group (p=0.0002). Flexion/extension NZs were 3.4 ± 2.8°, 5.0 ± 2.4°, and 0.7 ± 0.5°, respectively for the intact, injured/fixed, and injured/8-week groups, with the differences being significant for the injured/8-week group (p =0.04). CONCLUSION: The device acutely stabilizes the spine and promotes fusion at the site of injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50252822016-09-15 DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE Shahrokni, Maryam Zhu, Qingan Liu, Jie Tetzlaff, Wolfram Oxland, Thomas R. Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro and in vivo study in rats. OBJECTIVES: To design a novel rat spinal fixation device and investigate its biomechanical effectiveness in stabilizing the spine up to eight weeks post injury. METHODS: A fixation device made of polyetheretherketone was designed to stabilize the spine via bilateral clamping pieces. The device effectiveness was assessed in a Sprague-Dawley rat model after it was applied to a spine with a fracture-dislocation injury produced at C5–C6. Animals were euthanized either immediately (n=6) or eight weeks (n=9) post-injury and the C3-T1 segment of the cervical spine was removed for biomechanical evaluation. Segments of intact spinal columns (C3-T1) (n=6) served as uninjured controls. In these tests, anterior-posterior shear forces were applied to the C3 vertebra to produce flexion and extension bending moments at the injury site (peak 12.8Nmm). The resultant two-dimensional motions at the injury site (i.e. C5–C6) were measured using digital imaging and reported as ranges of motion (ROM) or neutral zones (NZ). RESULTS: Flexion/extension ROMs (average ± S.D.) were 18.1 ± 3.3°, 19.9 ± 7.5°, and 1.5 ± 0.7°, respectively for the intact, injured/fixed, and injured/8-week groups, with the differences being highly significant for the injured/8-week group (p=0.0002). Flexion/extension NZs were 3.4 ± 2.8°, 5.0 ± 2.4°, and 0.7 ± 0.5°, respectively for the intact, injured/fixed, and injured/8-week groups, with the differences being significant for the injured/8-week group (p =0.04). CONCLUSION: The device acutely stabilizes the spine and promotes fusion at the site of injury. 2012-01-31 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5025282/ /pubmed/22289899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.185 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Shahrokni, Maryam
Zhu, Qingan
Liu, Jie
Tetzlaff, Wolfram
Oxland, Thomas R.
DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title_full DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title_fullStr DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title_full_unstemmed DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title_short DESIGN AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF A RODENT SPINAL FIXATION DEVICE
title_sort design and biomechanical evaluation of a rodent spinal fixation device
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22289899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.185
work_keys_str_mv AT shahroknimaryam designandbiomechanicalevaluationofarodentspinalfixationdevice
AT zhuqingan designandbiomechanicalevaluationofarodentspinalfixationdevice
AT liujie designandbiomechanicalevaluationofarodentspinalfixationdevice
AT tetzlaffwolfram designandbiomechanicalevaluationofarodentspinalfixationdevice
AT oxlandthomasr designandbiomechanicalevaluationofarodentspinalfixationdevice