Cargando…

Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach

Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoshi, Koki, Irisawa, Atsushi, Shibukawa, Goro, Yamabe, Akane, Fujisawa, Mariko, Igarashi, Ryo, Yoshida, Yoshitsugu, Abe, Yoko, Imbe, Koh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094
_version_ 1782453939089702912
author Hoshi, Koki
Irisawa, Atsushi
Shibukawa, Goro
Yamabe, Akane
Fujisawa, Mariko
Igarashi, Ryo
Yoshida, Yoshitsugu
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
author_facet Hoshi, Koki
Irisawa, Atsushi
Shibukawa, Goro
Yamabe, Akane
Fujisawa, Mariko
Igarashi, Ryo
Yoshida, Yoshitsugu
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
author_sort Hoshi, Koki
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submucosal layer of an isolated porcine stomach. The stomach was fixed to a plate with nails, and was placed in a tub filled with water. The primary endpoint was feasibility of the newly developed model for EUS-FNA training, evaluated as follows: 1) visualization of the target lesion with blinding for lesion location; 2) penetrability of the needle; 3) sampling rate of macroscopic specimen; and 4) ROSE capability. Secondary endpoints were its durability and utility for multiple EUS-FNA procedures during EUS-FNA training, and the ease and cost of preparing the model. Results: Six endoscopists (1 expert, 5 trainees) attempted EUS-FNA procedures using this model. The target lesion could be identified clearly, and EUS-FNA could be performed with realistic resistance felt. In addition, rapid on-site evaluation could be easily achieved. Based on 10 needlings by each endoscopist, adequate specimens for histology could be macroscopically taken with an average 85 % success rate. Visibility and maneuverability were maintained throughout all needlings. Preparation time for this model was less than 30 minutes with a total cost of $ 22. Conclusions: An easy-to-use and inexpensive training model with a realistic feel of needling was created. This model can potentially enable beginners to practice safe and effective EUS-FNA procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50253482016-09-20 Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach Hoshi, Koki Irisawa, Atsushi Shibukawa, Goro Yamabe, Akane Fujisawa, Mariko Igarashi, Ryo Yoshida, Yoshitsugu Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submucosal layer of an isolated porcine stomach. The stomach was fixed to a plate with nails, and was placed in a tub filled with water. The primary endpoint was feasibility of the newly developed model for EUS-FNA training, evaluated as follows: 1) visualization of the target lesion with blinding for lesion location; 2) penetrability of the needle; 3) sampling rate of macroscopic specimen; and 4) ROSE capability. Secondary endpoints were its durability and utility for multiple EUS-FNA procedures during EUS-FNA training, and the ease and cost of preparing the model. Results: Six endoscopists (1 expert, 5 trainees) attempted EUS-FNA procedures using this model. The target lesion could be identified clearly, and EUS-FNA could be performed with realistic resistance felt. In addition, rapid on-site evaluation could be easily achieved. Based on 10 needlings by each endoscopist, adequate specimens for histology could be macroscopically taken with an average 85 % success rate. Visibility and maneuverability were maintained throughout all needlings. Preparation time for this model was less than 30 minutes with a total cost of $ 22. Conclusions: An easy-to-use and inexpensive training model with a realistic feel of needling was created. This model can potentially enable beginners to practice safe and effective EUS-FNA procedures. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-09 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5025348/ /pubmed/27652292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Hoshi, Koki
Irisawa, Atsushi
Shibukawa, Goro
Yamabe, Akane
Fujisawa, Mariko
Igarashi, Ryo
Yoshida, Yoshitsugu
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title_full Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title_fullStr Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title_short Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
title_sort validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive eus-fna training model using isolated porcine stomach
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094
work_keys_str_mv AT hoshikoki validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT irisawaatsushi validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT shibukawagoro validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT yamabeakane validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT fujisawamariko validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT igarashiryo validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT yoshidayoshitsugu validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT abeyoko validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach
AT imbekoh validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach