Cargando…
Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach
Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094 |
_version_ | 1782453939089702912 |
---|---|
author | Hoshi, Koki Irisawa, Atsushi Shibukawa, Goro Yamabe, Akane Fujisawa, Mariko Igarashi, Ryo Yoshida, Yoshitsugu Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh |
author_facet | Hoshi, Koki Irisawa, Atsushi Shibukawa, Goro Yamabe, Akane Fujisawa, Mariko Igarashi, Ryo Yoshida, Yoshitsugu Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh |
author_sort | Hoshi, Koki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submucosal layer of an isolated porcine stomach. The stomach was fixed to a plate with nails, and was placed in a tub filled with water. The primary endpoint was feasibility of the newly developed model for EUS-FNA training, evaluated as follows: 1) visualization of the target lesion with blinding for lesion location; 2) penetrability of the needle; 3) sampling rate of macroscopic specimen; and 4) ROSE capability. Secondary endpoints were its durability and utility for multiple EUS-FNA procedures during EUS-FNA training, and the ease and cost of preparing the model. Results: Six endoscopists (1 expert, 5 trainees) attempted EUS-FNA procedures using this model. The target lesion could be identified clearly, and EUS-FNA could be performed with realistic resistance felt. In addition, rapid on-site evaluation could be easily achieved. Based on 10 needlings by each endoscopist, adequate specimens for histology could be macroscopically taken with an average 85 % success rate. Visibility and maneuverability were maintained throughout all needlings. Preparation time for this model was less than 30 minutes with a total cost of $ 22. Conclusions: An easy-to-use and inexpensive training model with a realistic feel of needling was created. This model can potentially enable beginners to practice safe and effective EUS-FNA procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5025348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50253482016-09-20 Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach Hoshi, Koki Irisawa, Atsushi Shibukawa, Goro Yamabe, Akane Fujisawa, Mariko Igarashi, Ryo Yoshida, Yoshitsugu Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Trainees are required to learn EUS-FNA using a model before working with a patient. The aim of the current study was to validate a new training model developed for EUS-FNA. Patients and methods: Several fresh chicken tenderloins were embedded as target lesions in the submucosal layer of an isolated porcine stomach. The stomach was fixed to a plate with nails, and was placed in a tub filled with water. The primary endpoint was feasibility of the newly developed model for EUS-FNA training, evaluated as follows: 1) visualization of the target lesion with blinding for lesion location; 2) penetrability of the needle; 3) sampling rate of macroscopic specimen; and 4) ROSE capability. Secondary endpoints were its durability and utility for multiple EUS-FNA procedures during EUS-FNA training, and the ease and cost of preparing the model. Results: Six endoscopists (1 expert, 5 trainees) attempted EUS-FNA procedures using this model. The target lesion could be identified clearly, and EUS-FNA could be performed with realistic resistance felt. In addition, rapid on-site evaluation could be easily achieved. Based on 10 needlings by each endoscopist, adequate specimens for histology could be macroscopically taken with an average 85 % success rate. Visibility and maneuverability were maintained throughout all needlings. Preparation time for this model was less than 30 minutes with a total cost of $ 22. Conclusions: An easy-to-use and inexpensive training model with a realistic feel of needling was created. This model can potentially enable beginners to practice safe and effective EUS-FNA procedures. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-09 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5025348/ /pubmed/27652292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Hoshi, Koki Irisawa, Atsushi Shibukawa, Goro Yamabe, Akane Fujisawa, Mariko Igarashi, Ryo Yoshida, Yoshitsugu Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title | Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title_full | Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title_fullStr | Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title_short | Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach |
title_sort | validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive eus-fna training model using isolated porcine stomach |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoshikoki validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT irisawaatsushi validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT shibukawagoro validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT yamabeakane validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT fujisawamariko validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT igarashiryo validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT yoshidayoshitsugu validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT abeyoko validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach AT imbekoh validationofarealisticsimpleandinexpensiveeusfnatrainingmodelusingisolatedporcinestomach |