Cargando…

Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar

AIM: To explore the prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, in patients in Clinical hospital Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina, region of Herzegovina). METHODS: In this study, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar prevalence was investigated in fresh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babić, Emil, Bevanda, Milenko, Mimica, Mladen, Karin, Maja, Volarić, Mile, Bogut, Ante, Barišić, Tatjana, Pravdić, Danijel, Šutalo, Nikica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3261-7
_version_ 1782453940933099520
author Babić, Emil
Bevanda, Milenko
Mimica, Mladen
Karin, Maja
Volarić, Mile
Bogut, Ante
Barišić, Tatjana
Pravdić, Danijel
Šutalo, Nikica
author_facet Babić, Emil
Bevanda, Milenko
Mimica, Mladen
Karin, Maja
Volarić, Mile
Bogut, Ante
Barišić, Tatjana
Pravdić, Danijel
Šutalo, Nikica
author_sort Babić, Emil
collection PubMed
description AIM: To explore the prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, in patients in Clinical hospital Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina, region of Herzegovina). METHODS: In this study, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar prevalence was investigated in fresh faeces by native microscopy and immunochromatographic rapid assay “RIDA(®)QUICK Entamoeba test”, in 119 cases of new found IBD patients, 84 of ulcerative colitis and 35 of Crohn’s disease and in control group who had also 119 patients who didn’t have any gastrointestinal complaints. IBD diagnosis was established by standard diagnostic procedures (anamnesis, clinical manifestations, laboratory, endoscopy and biopsy). RESULTS: Entamoeba histolytica/dispar were found in 19 (16.0 %) of a total of 119 cases, 12 (14.3 %) of the 84 patients with ulcerative colitis and 7 (20.0 %) of the 35 patients with Crohn’s disease. As for the 119 patients in the control group who had not any gastrointestinal complaints, 2 (1.7 %) patients were found to have E. histolytica/dispar in their faeces. Amoeba prevalence in the patient group was determined to be significantly higher in group with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBD total than in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ameba infections in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, have a greater prevalence compared to the normal population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50254032016-09-20 Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar Babić, Emil Bevanda, Milenko Mimica, Mladen Karin, Maja Volarić, Mile Bogut, Ante Barišić, Tatjana Pravdić, Danijel Šutalo, Nikica Springerplus Research AIM: To explore the prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, in patients in Clinical hospital Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina, region of Herzegovina). METHODS: In this study, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar prevalence was investigated in fresh faeces by native microscopy and immunochromatographic rapid assay “RIDA(®)QUICK Entamoeba test”, in 119 cases of new found IBD patients, 84 of ulcerative colitis and 35 of Crohn’s disease and in control group who had also 119 patients who didn’t have any gastrointestinal complaints. IBD diagnosis was established by standard diagnostic procedures (anamnesis, clinical manifestations, laboratory, endoscopy and biopsy). RESULTS: Entamoeba histolytica/dispar were found in 19 (16.0 %) of a total of 119 cases, 12 (14.3 %) of the 84 patients with ulcerative colitis and 7 (20.0 %) of the 35 patients with Crohn’s disease. As for the 119 patients in the control group who had not any gastrointestinal complaints, 2 (1.7 %) patients were found to have E. histolytica/dispar in their faeces. Amoeba prevalence in the patient group was determined to be significantly higher in group with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBD total than in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ameba infections in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, have a greater prevalence compared to the normal population. Springer International Publishing 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025403/ /pubmed/27652159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3261-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Babić, Emil
Bevanda, Milenko
Mimica, Mladen
Karin, Maja
Volarić, Mile
Bogut, Ante
Barišić, Tatjana
Pravdić, Danijel
Šutalo, Nikica
Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title_full Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title_fullStr Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title_short Prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in University Clinical Hospital Mostar
title_sort prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory bowel disease in university clinical hospital mostar
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3261-7
work_keys_str_mv AT babicemil prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT bevandamilenko prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT mimicamladen prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT karinmaja prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT volaricmile prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT bogutante prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT barisictatjana prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT pravdicdanijel prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar
AT sutalonikica prevalenceofamebiasisininflammatoryboweldiseaseinuniversityclinicalhospitalmostar