Cargando…

The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND: Isolation, long work days, climate change and globalization are just some of the many pressures that make farming a vulnerable occupation for incurring mental health issues. The objective of this study was to determine whether farming in Australia is associated with poorer wellbeing, phy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brew, Bronwyn, Inder, Kerry, Allen, Joanne, Thomas, Matthew, Kelly, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y
_version_ 1782453975674519552
author Brew, Bronwyn
Inder, Kerry
Allen, Joanne
Thomas, Matthew
Kelly, Brian
author_facet Brew, Bronwyn
Inder, Kerry
Allen, Joanne
Thomas, Matthew
Kelly, Brian
author_sort Brew, Bronwyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Isolation, long work days, climate change and globalization are just some of the many pressures that make farming a vulnerable occupation for incurring mental health issues. The objective of this study was to determine whether farming in Australia is associated with poorer wellbeing, physical and mental health, and less health service use. METHODS: The Australian Rural Mental Health Study, a longitudinal cohort study was analysed over four time points comparing farmers with non-farming workers (n = 1184 at baseline). Participants were recruited from rural NSW, Australia. A number of physical, mental health, wellbeing, service use outcomes were assessed using generalised estimating equations including all waves in each model. Barriers to seeking help were also assessed. RESULTS: Farmers who lived remotely reported worse mental health (β −0.33, 95 % CI −0.53, −0.13) and wellbeing (β −0.21(95 % CI −0.35, −0.06) than remote non-farm workers regardless of financial hardship, rural specific factors eg drought worry, or recent adverse events. All farmers were no different to non-farming workers on physical health aspects except for chronic illnesses, where they reported fewer illnesses (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44, 0.98). All farmers were half as likely to visit a general practitioner (GP) or a mental health professional in the last 12 months as compared to non-farm workers regardless of location (OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35, 0.97). Rural workers felt that they preferred to manage themselves rather than access help for physical health needs (50 %) or mental health needs (75 %) and there was little difference between farmers and non-farm workers in reasons for not seeking help. CONCLUSIONS: Remoteness is a significant factor in the mental health and wellbeing of farmers, more so than financial stress, rural factors and recent adverse events. Creative programs and policies that improve access for farmers to GPs and mental health professionals should be supported. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50255562016-09-20 The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study Brew, Bronwyn Inder, Kerry Allen, Joanne Thomas, Matthew Kelly, Brian BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Isolation, long work days, climate change and globalization are just some of the many pressures that make farming a vulnerable occupation for incurring mental health issues. The objective of this study was to determine whether farming in Australia is associated with poorer wellbeing, physical and mental health, and less health service use. METHODS: The Australian Rural Mental Health Study, a longitudinal cohort study was analysed over four time points comparing farmers with non-farming workers (n = 1184 at baseline). Participants were recruited from rural NSW, Australia. A number of physical, mental health, wellbeing, service use outcomes were assessed using generalised estimating equations including all waves in each model. Barriers to seeking help were also assessed. RESULTS: Farmers who lived remotely reported worse mental health (β −0.33, 95 % CI −0.53, −0.13) and wellbeing (β −0.21(95 % CI −0.35, −0.06) than remote non-farm workers regardless of financial hardship, rural specific factors eg drought worry, or recent adverse events. All farmers were no different to non-farming workers on physical health aspects except for chronic illnesses, where they reported fewer illnesses (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44, 0.98). All farmers were half as likely to visit a general practitioner (GP) or a mental health professional in the last 12 months as compared to non-farm workers regardless of location (OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35, 0.97). Rural workers felt that they preferred to manage themselves rather than access help for physical health needs (50 %) or mental health needs (75 %) and there was little difference between farmers and non-farm workers in reasons for not seeking help. CONCLUSIONS: Remoteness is a significant factor in the mental health and wellbeing of farmers, more so than financial stress, rural factors and recent adverse events. Creative programs and policies that improve access for farmers to GPs and mental health professionals should be supported. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025556/ /pubmed/27634298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brew, Bronwyn
Inder, Kerry
Allen, Joanne
Thomas, Matthew
Kelly, Brian
The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title_full The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title_short The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
title_sort health and wellbeing of australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y
work_keys_str_mv AT brewbronwyn thehealthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT inderkerry thehealthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT allenjoanne thehealthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT thomasmatthew thehealthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT kellybrian thehealthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT brewbronwyn healthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT inderkerry healthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT allenjoanne healthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT thomasmatthew healthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT kellybrian healthandwellbeingofaustralianfarmersalongitudinalcohortstudy