Cargando…

The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Thymosin α1 (Tα1) as immunomodulatory treatment is supposed to be beneficial for the sepsis patients by regulating T cell subsets and inflammatory mediators. However, limited by the small sample size and the poor study design, the persuasive power of the single clinical studies is weak....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fang, Wang, Hong-Mei, Wang, Tiansheng, Zhang, Ya-Mei, Zhu, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1823-5
_version_ 1782453977365872640
author Liu, Fang
Wang, Hong-Mei
Wang, Tiansheng
Zhang, Ya-Mei
Zhu, Xi
author_facet Liu, Fang
Wang, Hong-Mei
Wang, Tiansheng
Zhang, Ya-Mei
Zhu, Xi
author_sort Liu, Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thymosin α1 (Tα1) as immunomodulatory treatment is supposed to be beneficial for the sepsis patients by regulating T cell subsets and inflammatory mediators. However, limited by the small sample size and the poor study design, the persuasive power of the single clinical studies is weak. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of Tα1 on the sepsis patients. METHODS: We searched for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG, Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI) and Korean literature databases reporting the effects of Tα1 on outcomes in sepsis patients. RESULTS: Among 444 related articles, 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. Mortality events were reported in 10 RCTs included 530 patients, and the meta-analysis showed significant decrease in Tα1 group compared with control group (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.45 to 0.77, p = 0.0001). The subgroup analysis showed no difference between the two dosages (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.43 to 0.81; RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35 to 0.98, respectively). In 9 RCTs, with a total of 489 patients, Tα1 administered once per day decrease APACHE II score significantly (SMD −0.80, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.47, p < 0.0001) while Tα1 twice per day showed no effect (SMD 0.30, 95 % CI-0.10 to 0.70, p = 0.14). However, the length of ICU stay, the incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) and duration of mechanical ventilation were not significantly affected by Tα1 treatment (SMD −0.52, 95 % CI −1.06 to 0.11, p = 0.06; SMD −0.49, 95 % CI −1.09 to 0.11, p = 0.11; SMD −0.37, 95 % CI −0.90 to 0.17, p = 0.17, respectively). As to the immunological indicators, the level of HLA-DR were increased by Tα1 (SMD 1.23, 95 % CI 0.28 to 2.18, p = 0.01) according to the pooled analysis of 8 studies involving 721 patients. Lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4 and cytokines IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were also beneficially affected by Tα1 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tα1 may be beneficial to sepsis patients in reducing mortality and modulating inflammation reactions. However, the quality of evidence supporting the effectiveness is low considering the small sample sizes and inadequate adherence to standardized reporting guidelines for RCTs among the included studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50255652016-09-20 The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Liu, Fang Wang, Hong-Mei Wang, Tiansheng Zhang, Ya-Mei Zhu, Xi BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Thymosin α1 (Tα1) as immunomodulatory treatment is supposed to be beneficial for the sepsis patients by regulating T cell subsets and inflammatory mediators. However, limited by the small sample size and the poor study design, the persuasive power of the single clinical studies is weak. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of Tα1 on the sepsis patients. METHODS: We searched for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG, Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI) and Korean literature databases reporting the effects of Tα1 on outcomes in sepsis patients. RESULTS: Among 444 related articles, 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. Mortality events were reported in 10 RCTs included 530 patients, and the meta-analysis showed significant decrease in Tα1 group compared with control group (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.45 to 0.77, p = 0.0001). The subgroup analysis showed no difference between the two dosages (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.43 to 0.81; RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35 to 0.98, respectively). In 9 RCTs, with a total of 489 patients, Tα1 administered once per day decrease APACHE II score significantly (SMD −0.80, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.47, p < 0.0001) while Tα1 twice per day showed no effect (SMD 0.30, 95 % CI-0.10 to 0.70, p = 0.14). However, the length of ICU stay, the incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) and duration of mechanical ventilation were not significantly affected by Tα1 treatment (SMD −0.52, 95 % CI −1.06 to 0.11, p = 0.06; SMD −0.49, 95 % CI −1.09 to 0.11, p = 0.11; SMD −0.37, 95 % CI −0.90 to 0.17, p = 0.17, respectively). As to the immunological indicators, the level of HLA-DR were increased by Tα1 (SMD 1.23, 95 % CI 0.28 to 2.18, p = 0.01) according to the pooled analysis of 8 studies involving 721 patients. Lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4 and cytokines IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were also beneficially affected by Tα1 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tα1 may be beneficial to sepsis patients in reducing mortality and modulating inflammation reactions. However, the quality of evidence supporting the effectiveness is low considering the small sample sizes and inadequate adherence to standardized reporting guidelines for RCTs among the included studies. BioMed Central 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5025565/ /pubmed/27633969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1823-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Fang
Wang, Hong-Mei
Wang, Tiansheng
Zhang, Ya-Mei
Zhu, Xi
The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1823-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liufang theefficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wanghongmei theefficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangtiansheng theefficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangyamei theefficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhuxi theefficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liufang efficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wanghongmei efficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangtiansheng efficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangyamei efficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhuxi efficacyofthymosina1asimmunomodulatorytreatmentforsepsisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials