Cargando…
Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore cor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747 |
_version_ | 1782454025553182720 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Megan D. Craigie, Ian D. Harrison, Luke B. Geldmann, Jonas Collen, Ben Whitmee, Sarah Balmford, Andrew Burgess, Neil D. Brooks, Thomas Hockings, Marc Woodley, Stephen |
author_facet | Barnes, Megan D. Craigie, Ian D. Harrison, Luke B. Geldmann, Jonas Collen, Ben Whitmee, Sarah Balmford, Andrew Burgess, Neil D. Brooks, Thomas Hockings, Marc Woodley, Stephen |
author_sort | Barnes, Megan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore correlates of population change in 1,902 populations of birds and mammals from 447 PAs globally. On an average, we find PAs are maintaining populations of monitored birds and mammals within their boundaries. Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs located in countries with higher development scores, and for larger-bodied species. These results suggest that active management can consistently overcome disadvantages of lower reproductive rates and more severe threats experienced by larger species of birds and mammals. The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the social and economic conditions supporting PAs are critical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5025815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50258152016-09-23 Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size Barnes, Megan D. Craigie, Ian D. Harrison, Luke B. Geldmann, Jonas Collen, Ben Whitmee, Sarah Balmford, Andrew Burgess, Neil D. Brooks, Thomas Hockings, Marc Woodley, Stephen Nat Commun Article Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore correlates of population change in 1,902 populations of birds and mammals from 447 PAs globally. On an average, we find PAs are maintaining populations of monitored birds and mammals within their boundaries. Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs located in countries with higher development scores, and for larger-bodied species. These results suggest that active management can consistently overcome disadvantages of lower reproductive rates and more severe threats experienced by larger species of birds and mammals. The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the social and economic conditions supporting PAs are critical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5025815/ /pubmed/27582180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Barnes, Megan D. Craigie, Ian D. Harrison, Luke B. Geldmann, Jonas Collen, Ben Whitmee, Sarah Balmford, Andrew Burgess, Neil D. Brooks, Thomas Hockings, Marc Woodley, Stephen Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title | Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title_full | Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title_fullStr | Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title_full_unstemmed | Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title_short | Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
title_sort | wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesmegand wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT craigieiand wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT harrisonlukeb wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT geldmannjonas wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT collenben wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT whitmeesarah wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT balmfordandrew wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT burgessneild wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT brooksthomas wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT hockingsmarc wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize AT woodleystephen wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize |