Cargando…

Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size

Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Megan D., Craigie, Ian D., Harrison, Luke B., Geldmann, Jonas, Collen, Ben, Whitmee, Sarah, Balmford, Andrew, Burgess, Neil D., Brooks, Thomas, Hockings, Marc, Woodley, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747
_version_ 1782454025553182720
author Barnes, Megan D.
Craigie, Ian D.
Harrison, Luke B.
Geldmann, Jonas
Collen, Ben
Whitmee, Sarah
Balmford, Andrew
Burgess, Neil D.
Brooks, Thomas
Hockings, Marc
Woodley, Stephen
author_facet Barnes, Megan D.
Craigie, Ian D.
Harrison, Luke B.
Geldmann, Jonas
Collen, Ben
Whitmee, Sarah
Balmford, Andrew
Burgess, Neil D.
Brooks, Thomas
Hockings, Marc
Woodley, Stephen
author_sort Barnes, Megan D.
collection PubMed
description Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore correlates of population change in 1,902 populations of birds and mammals from 447 PAs globally. On an average, we find PAs are maintaining populations of monitored birds and mammals within their boundaries. Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs located in countries with higher development scores, and for larger-bodied species. These results suggest that active management can consistently overcome disadvantages of lower reproductive rates and more severe threats experienced by larger species of birds and mammals. The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the social and economic conditions supporting PAs are critical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50258152016-09-23 Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size Barnes, Megan D. Craigie, Ian D. Harrison, Luke B. Geldmann, Jonas Collen, Ben Whitmee, Sarah Balmford, Andrew Burgess, Neil D. Brooks, Thomas Hockings, Marc Woodley, Stephen Nat Commun Article Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore correlates of population change in 1,902 populations of birds and mammals from 447 PAs globally. On an average, we find PAs are maintaining populations of monitored birds and mammals within their boundaries. Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs located in countries with higher development scores, and for larger-bodied species. These results suggest that active management can consistently overcome disadvantages of lower reproductive rates and more severe threats experienced by larger species of birds and mammals. The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the social and economic conditions supporting PAs are critical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5025815/ /pubmed/27582180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Barnes, Megan D.
Craigie, Ian D.
Harrison, Luke B.
Geldmann, Jonas
Collen, Ben
Whitmee, Sarah
Balmford, Andrew
Burgess, Neil D.
Brooks, Thomas
Hockings, Marc
Woodley, Stephen
Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title_full Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title_fullStr Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title_short Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
title_sort wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12747
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesmegand wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT craigieiand wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT harrisonlukeb wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT geldmannjonas wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT collenben wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT whitmeesarah wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT balmfordandrew wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT burgessneild wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT brooksthomas wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT hockingsmarc wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize
AT woodleystephen wildlifepopulationtrendsinprotectedareaspredictedbynationalsocioeconomicmetricsandbodysize