Cargando…

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study

Electroporation is a phenomenon occurring due to exposure of cells to Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) which leads to increase of membrane permeability. Electroporation is used in medicine, biotechnology, and food processing. Recently, as an alternative to electroporation by PEF, Pulsed ElectroMagnetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novickij, Vitalij, Grainys, Audrius, Lastauskienė, Eglė, Kananavičiūtė, Rūta, Pamedytytė, Dovilė, Kalėdienė, Lilija, Novickij, Jurij, Miklavčič, Damijan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33537
_version_ 1782454035784138752
author Novickij, Vitalij
Grainys, Audrius
Lastauskienė, Eglė
Kananavičiūtė, Rūta
Pamedytytė, Dovilė
Kalėdienė, Lilija
Novickij, Jurij
Miklavčič, Damijan
author_facet Novickij, Vitalij
Grainys, Audrius
Lastauskienė, Eglė
Kananavičiūtė, Rūta
Pamedytytė, Dovilė
Kalėdienė, Lilija
Novickij, Jurij
Miklavčič, Damijan
author_sort Novickij, Vitalij
collection PubMed
description Electroporation is a phenomenon occurring due to exposure of cells to Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) which leads to increase of membrane permeability. Electroporation is used in medicine, biotechnology, and food processing. Recently, as an alternative to electroporation by PEF, Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Fields (PEMF) application causing similar biological effects was suggested. Since induced electric field in PEMF however is 2–3 magnitudes lower than in PEF electroporation, the membrane permeabilization mechanism remains hypothetical. We have designed pilot experiments where Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida lusitaniae cells were subjected to single 100–250 μs electrical pulse of 800 V with and without concomitant delivery of magnetic pulse (3, 6 and 9 T). As expected, after the PEF pulses only the number of Propidium Iodide (PI) fluorescent cells has increased, indicative of membrane permeabilization. We further show that single sub-millisecond magnetic field pulse did not cause detectable poration of yeast. Concomitant exposure of cells to pulsed electric (PEF) and magnetic field (PMF) however resulted in the increased number PI fluorescent cells and reduced viability. Our results show increased membrane permeability by PEF when combined with magnetic field pulse, which can explain electroporation at considerably lower electric field strengths induced by PEMF compared to classical electroporation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5025861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50258612016-09-22 Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study Novickij, Vitalij Grainys, Audrius Lastauskienė, Eglė Kananavičiūtė, Rūta Pamedytytė, Dovilė Kalėdienė, Lilija Novickij, Jurij Miklavčič, Damijan Sci Rep Article Electroporation is a phenomenon occurring due to exposure of cells to Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) which leads to increase of membrane permeability. Electroporation is used in medicine, biotechnology, and food processing. Recently, as an alternative to electroporation by PEF, Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Fields (PEMF) application causing similar biological effects was suggested. Since induced electric field in PEMF however is 2–3 magnitudes lower than in PEF electroporation, the membrane permeabilization mechanism remains hypothetical. We have designed pilot experiments where Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida lusitaniae cells were subjected to single 100–250 μs electrical pulse of 800 V with and without concomitant delivery of magnetic pulse (3, 6 and 9 T). As expected, after the PEF pulses only the number of Propidium Iodide (PI) fluorescent cells has increased, indicative of membrane permeabilization. We further show that single sub-millisecond magnetic field pulse did not cause detectable poration of yeast. Concomitant exposure of cells to pulsed electric (PEF) and magnetic field (PMF) however resulted in the increased number PI fluorescent cells and reduced viability. Our results show increased membrane permeability by PEF when combined with magnetic field pulse, which can explain electroporation at considerably lower electric field strengths induced by PEMF compared to classical electroporation. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5025861/ /pubmed/27634482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33537 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Novickij, Vitalij
Grainys, Audrius
Lastauskienė, Eglė
Kananavičiūtė, Rūta
Pamedytytė, Dovilė
Kalėdienė, Lilija
Novickij, Jurij
Miklavčič, Damijan
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title_full Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title_short Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study
title_sort pulsed electromagnetic field assisted in vitro electroporation: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33537
work_keys_str_mv AT novickijvitalij pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT grainysaudrius pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT lastauskieneegle pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT kananaviciuteruta pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT pamedytytedovile pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT kaledienelilija pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT novickijjurij pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy
AT miklavcicdamijan pulsedelectromagneticfieldassistedinvitroelectroporationapilotstudy