Cargando…

Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study

AIM: To evaluate the effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the smear layer removal from root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 mandibular premolars were decoronated to working the length of 12 mm and prepared with protaper rotary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amin, Khalid, Masoodi, Ajaz, Nabi, Shahnaz, Ahmad, Parvaiz, Farooq, Riyaz, Purra, Aamir Rashid, Ahangar, Fayaz Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656060
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190005
_version_ 1782454079955402752
author Amin, Khalid
Masoodi, Ajaz
Nabi, Shahnaz
Ahmad, Parvaiz
Farooq, Riyaz
Purra, Aamir Rashid
Ahangar, Fayaz Ahmad
author_facet Amin, Khalid
Masoodi, Ajaz
Nabi, Shahnaz
Ahmad, Parvaiz
Farooq, Riyaz
Purra, Aamir Rashid
Ahangar, Fayaz Ahmad
author_sort Amin, Khalid
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the smear layer removal from root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 mandibular premolars were decoronated to working the length of 12 mm and prepared with protaper rotary files up to size F3. Group A canals irrigated with 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group B canals irrigated with 1 ml of 17% EDTA followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group C canals lased with a diode laser. Group D canals were initially irrigated with 0.8 ml of 17% EDTA the remaining 0.2 ml was used to fill the root canals, and diode laser application was done. Group E canals were irrigated with 1 ml distilled water with passive ultrasonic activation, followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group F canals were irrigated with 1 ml EDTA with passive ultrasonic activation, followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Scanning electron microscope examination of canals was done for remaining smear layer at coronal middle and apical third levels. RESULTS: Ultrasonics with EDTA had the least smear layer scores. CONCLUSION: Diode laser alone performed significantly better than ultrasonics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5026101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50261012016-09-21 Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study Amin, Khalid Masoodi, Ajaz Nabi, Shahnaz Ahmad, Parvaiz Farooq, Riyaz Purra, Aamir Rashid Ahangar, Fayaz Ahmad J Conserv Dent Original Research Article AIM: To evaluate the effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the smear layer removal from root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 mandibular premolars were decoronated to working the length of 12 mm and prepared with protaper rotary files up to size F3. Group A canals irrigated with 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group B canals irrigated with 1 ml of 17% EDTA followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group C canals lased with a diode laser. Group D canals were initially irrigated with 0.8 ml of 17% EDTA the remaining 0.2 ml was used to fill the root canals, and diode laser application was done. Group E canals were irrigated with 1 ml distilled water with passive ultrasonic activation, followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Group F canals were irrigated with 1 ml EDTA with passive ultrasonic activation, followed by 3 ml of 3% NaOCl. Scanning electron microscope examination of canals was done for remaining smear layer at coronal middle and apical third levels. RESULTS: Ultrasonics with EDTA had the least smear layer scores. CONCLUSION: Diode laser alone performed significantly better than ultrasonics. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5026101/ /pubmed/27656060 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190005 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Amin, Khalid
Masoodi, Ajaz
Nabi, Shahnaz
Ahmad, Parvaiz
Farooq, Riyaz
Purra, Aamir Rashid
Ahangar, Fayaz Ahmad
Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title_short Effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: A scanning electron microscope study
title_sort effect of diode laser and ultrasonics with and without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal from the root canals: a scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656060
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190005
work_keys_str_mv AT aminkhalid effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT masoodiajaz effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT nabishahnaz effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT ahmadparvaiz effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT farooqriyaz effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT purraaamirrashid effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT ahangarfayazahmad effectofdiodelaserandultrasonicswithandwithoutethylenediaminetetraaceticacidonsmearlayerremovalfromtherootcanalsascanningelectronmicroscopestudy